Public recordCritical
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-14 06:41 UTC
postfinance / discovery
Service discovery for prometheus.
postfinance/discovery holds a health index of 16 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (66/100) and lowest on Vitality (19/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.
16
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
16
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
PostFinance AGOrganization · verified domain
53 followers44 public repossince Dec 2017
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/postfinance/discovery | v0.9.0 | - | 28 | 1330 days ago |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
19
Development activity
1Critical
Abandonment alert
Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it
archived on GitHub by its maintainersOverall rating: Critical ceiling
Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.
How abandonment is assessedHow it's scored
| 0/36 | Push recency — last push 848 days ago |
| 0/36 | Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits, discounted for automation: 23 of the last 100 commits human-authored, spanning 440 days |
| 0/18 | Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year, discounted for automation: 23 of the last 100 commits human-authored, spanning 440 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 0 |
| human_commit_share | 0.23 |
| days_since_last_push | 848 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 0 |
Release discipline
47Weak
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 26 releases published |
| 0/36 | Release recency — latest release 1,330 days ago |
| 19.8/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~71.5 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 26 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.9.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 1,330 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 71.5 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
33
Popularity & adoption
18Critical
How it's scored
| 18.1/60 | Stars — 14 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 1 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 2 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 1 |
| stars | 14 |
| watchers | 2 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
62
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
15Critical
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 0.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits |
| 2.7/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 2 contributors |
| 3/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 2 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.995 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
89Excellent
How it's scored
| 42/42 | Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed |
| 22.3/30 | PR acceptance — 145/195 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 145 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 23 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 1 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 50 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
86Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 20/20 | Verified domain |
| 12.5/25 | Owner reach — 53 followers of postfinance |
| 24/25 | Track record — 44 public repos, account ~8 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 53 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | yes |
| owner_login | postfinance |
| public_repos | 44 |
| account_age_days | 3,231 |
Package maintenance
69Good
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go |
| 4/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 1,330 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 28 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | github.com/postfinance/discovery |
| ecosystems | go |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 1,330 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
58
Engineering practices
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 1 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — .golangci.yaml |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
33
Security posture
33At Risk
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — no data |
| 0.8/2.5 | Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — project is archived |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 64 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 15 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 3 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 3.3 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Code-Review, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
66
Agent context & guidance
40Weak
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 23 of 23 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 1 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — Go (statically typed) |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 8/8 | Automated maintenance — 77 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | go.sum |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | go.mod |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0.77 |
Code legibility for models
99Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed) |
| 53.6/55 | Manageable file sizes — 2/79 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Go |
| largest_source_bytes | 1,061,588 |
| source_files_sampled | 79 |
| oversized_source_files | 2 |
Machine-readable interfaces
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 40/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — proto/google/api/annotations.proto, proto/google/api/http.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/namespace.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/namespace_api.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/server.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/server_api.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/service.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/service_api.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/targetgroup.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/token_api.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/tokeninfo.proto |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/40 | Runnable examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | — |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | proto/google/api/annotations.proto, proto/google/api/http.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/namespace.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/namespace_api.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/server.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/server_api.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/service.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/service_api.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/targetgroup.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/token_api.proto, proto/postfinance/discovery/v1/tokeninfo.proto |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
14GitHub stars
2contributors
0commits, last 12 months
848days since last push
26releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| 0 | CI-Tests | 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| n/a | Code-Review | Found no human activity in the last 30 changesets |
| 3 | Contributors | project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 0 | Maintained | project is archived |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 64 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 27
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/alecthomas/kong | v0.8.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3 | v3.9.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4 | v4.5.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/golang/protobuf | v1.5.4 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/google/renameio | v1.0.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware | v1.4.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-prometheus | v1.2.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2 | v2.19.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/pkg/errors | v0.9.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/postfinance/flash | v0.5.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/postfinance/profiler | v0.1.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/postfinance/single | v0.0.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/postfinance/store | v0.3.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/prometheus/client_golang | v1.18.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/satori/go.uuid | v1.2.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/sethvargo/go-retry | v0.2.4 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/stretchr/testify | v1.8.4 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/zbindenren/king | v0.3.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/zbindenren/sfmt | v0.1.0 | go.mod |
| Go | go.uber.org/zap | v1.26.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/oauth2 | v0.17.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/term | v0.20.0 | go.mod |
| Go | google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api | v0.0.0-20240227224415-6ceb2ff114de | go.mod |
| Go | google.golang.org/grpc | v1.63.2 | go.mod |
| Go | google.golang.org/protobuf | v1.33.0 | go.mod |
| Go | gopkg.in/yaml.v3 | v3.0.1 | go.mod |
| Go | k8s.io/apimachinery | v0.29.1 | go.mod |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.