Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 00:23 UTC

poteto0 / takibi

hono inspired Type-Safe-Context WebFramework for golang

GoMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗

poteto0/takibi holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

potetoPersonal account
11 followers39 public repossince Jun 2020FUJIFILM Inc.

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/poteto0/takibiv0.7.0-750 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence16/52 weeks with commits
17.6/18Commit volume90 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained13 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year90
human_commit_share0.856
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases7 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 50 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~6.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv0.7.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release50
mean_days_between_releases6.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
30.5/42Issue resolution73% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance75/86 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs75
open_issues17
closed_issues45
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.726
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
7.8/25Owner reach11 followers of poteto0
23.7/25Track record39 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginpoteto0
public_repos39
account_age_days2,275
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 50 days ago
20/20Version history7 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/poteto0/takibi
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish50

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yaml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgolang, honojs, type-safe, webframework
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained13 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities28 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories35
affected_packages9
assessed_packages169
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 5, moderate 1, low 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 169 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

92Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history69 of 77 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.896
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,559
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapjustfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yaml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice38 of the last 90 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance13 of the last 90 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.422
toolchain_manifests_templates/cloudflare-worker/go.mod, docs-tool/go.mod, docs/go.mod, examples/hello-world/go.mod, examples/syumai-worker/go.mod, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.144
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/67 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes23,238
source_files_sampled67
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
90commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
17open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/poteto0/takibi-docs-tool' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 00:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities28 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2v2.26.1docs-tool/go.mod
Gogithub.com/a-h/templv0.3.1020go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/securecookiev1.1.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/syumai/go-jsutilv0.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/syumai/workersv0.33.0go.mod
All dependencies 169

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 162 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/a-h/templv0.3.1020direct
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2v2.26.1direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/securecookiev1.1.2direct
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/syumai/go-jsutilv0.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/syumai/workersv0.33.0direct
Gogithub.com/a-h/parsev0.0.0-20250122154542-74294addb73eindirect
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4v4.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cli/browserv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2v2.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/natefinch/atomicv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/poteto0/takibiv0.7.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.26.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.51.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.16.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.41.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.35.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler0.5.0indirect
npm@cloudflare/unenv-preset2.16.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-641.20260518.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-641.20260526.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-641.20260714.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-arm641.20260518.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-arm641.20260526.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-arm641.20260714.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-641.20260518.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-641.20260526.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-641.20260714.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-arm641.20260518.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-arm641.20260526.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-arm641.20260714.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-windows-641.20260518.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-windows-641.20260526.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-windows-641.20260714.1indirect
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.27.3indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@img/colour1.1.0indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-ppc641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-riscv641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-ppc640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-riscv640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-s390x0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-wasm320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-ia320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-x640.34.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@poppinss/colors4.1.6indirect
npm@poppinss/dumper0.6.5indirect
npm@poppinss/exception1.2.3indirect
npm@sindresorhus/is7.2.0indirect
npm@speed-highlight/core1.2.15indirect
npm@speed-highlight/core1.2.17indirect
npmblake3-wasm2.1.5indirect
npmcookie1.1.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmerror-stack-parser-es1.0.5indirect
npmesbuild0.27.3indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmminiflare4.20260518.0indirect
npmminiflare4.20260526.0indirect
npmminiflare4.20260714.0indirect
npmpath-to-regexp6.3.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmrosie-skills0.6.4indirect
npmrosie-skills-darwin-arm640.6.4indirect
npmrosie-skills-freebsd-x640.6.4indirect
npmrosie-skills-linux-x640.6.4indirect
npmsemver7.8.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsharp0.34.5indirect
npmsupports-color10.2.2indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmundici7.24.8indirect
npmundici7.28.0indirect
npmunenv2.0.0-rc.24indirect
npmworkerd1.20260518.1indirect
npmworkerd1.20260526.1indirect
npmworkerd1.20260714.1indirect
npmwrangler4.112.0indirect
npmwrangler4.93.0indirect
npmwrangler4.95.0indirect
npmws8.18.0indirect
npmws8.20.1indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmyouch4.1.0-beta.10indirect
npmyouch-core0.3.3indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 169 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
sharp0.34.5indirecthigh20.35.4
undici7.24.8indirecthigh128.9.0
undici7.28.0indirecthigh58.9.0
ws8.18.0indirecthigh28.21.0
ws8.20.1indirecthigh18.21.0
golang.org/x/netv0.51.0indirectmoderate91.27.0-rc.3
esbuild0.27.3indirectlow10.28.1
golang.org/x/modv0.26.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.41.0indirectunknown10.44.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.