Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 03:40 UTC

ppy / SDL3-CS

C# bindings for SDL3 (https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL)

C#MIT★ 179 stars⑂ 30 forkssince Apr 2024View on GitHub ↗

ppy/SDL3-CS holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (41/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ppyOrganization
2,207 followers53 public repossince Aug 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetppy.SDL3-CS2026.722.0-440 days agosdlsdl3sdl3-cs
NuGetppy.SDL3_ttf-CS2026.629.0-2022 days ago
NuGetppy.SDL3_image-CS2026.722.0-200 days ago
NuGetppy.SDL3_mixer-CS2026.722.0-180 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume116 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year116
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases45 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~27.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tag2026.722.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases27.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.5/60Stars179 stars
12.2/25Forks30 forks
5.6/15Watchers11 watchers
Inputs used
forks30
stars179
watchers11
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
59.7/80Total downloads559,431 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesppy.SDL3-CS, ppy.SDL3_ttf-CS, ppy.SDL3_image-CS, ppy.SDL3_mixer-CS
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads559,431
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.573
How it's scored
35/42Issue resolution83% of issues closed
26.1/30PR acceptance225/259 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs225
open_issues5
closed_issues25
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.833
closed_unmerged_prs34
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
24/25Owner reach2,207 followers of ppy
24.6/25Track record53 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,207
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginppy
public_repos53
account_age_days5,447
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history44 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesppy.SDL3-CS, ppy.SDL3_ttf-CS, ppy.SDL3_image-CS, ppy.SDL3_mixer-CS
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages8
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 8 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
22.1/40Legible commit history41 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.414
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapSDL3-CS.SourceGeneration/SDL3-CS.SourceGeneration.csproj, SDL3-CS.Tests.Android/SDL3-CS.Tests.Android.csproj, SDL3-CS.Tests.Desktop/SDL3-CS.Tests.Desktop.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsSDL3-CS.SourceGeneration/SDL3-CS.SourceGeneration.csproj, SDL3-CS.Tests.Android/SDL3-CS.Tests.Android.csproj, SDL3-CS.Tests.Desktop/SDL3-CS.Tests.Desktop.csproj, SDL3-CS.Tests.iOS/SDL3-CS.Tests.iOS.csproj, SDL3-CS.Tests/SDL3-CS.Tests.csproj, SDL3-CS/SDL3-CS.csproj, SDL3_image-CS/SDL3_image-CS.csproj, SDL3_mixer-CS/SDL3_mixer-CS.csproj, SDL3_ttf-CS/SDL3_ttf-CS.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes2/141 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes73,695
source_files_sampled141
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

179GitHub stars
13contributors
116commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
45releases
1bus factor
5open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 179 ★ / 30 ⇿
179Stars
30Forks
44Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

040801201602001792742024-042025-052026-07
Major 0Minor 40Patch 4

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 03:40 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
5CI-Tests6 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.3.4SDL3-CS.SourceGeneration/SDL3-CS.SourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.3.0SDL3-CS.SourceGeneration/SDL3-CS.SourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces4.3.0SDL3-CS.SourceGeneration/SDL3-CS.SourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.0.0SDL3-CS.Tests/SDL3-CS.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.13.3SDL3-CS.Tests/SDL3-CS.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.4.2SDL3-CS.Tests/SDL3-CS.Tests.csproj
NuGetlibclang17.0.4SDL3-CS/SDL3-CS.csproj
NuGetlibClangSharp17.0.4SDL3-CS/SDL3-CS.csproj
All dependencies 8

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetlibclang17.0.4direct
NuGetlibClangSharp17.0.4direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.3.4direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.3.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces4.3.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.0.0direct
NuGetNUnit3.13.3direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.4.2direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 8 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.