Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 20:42 UTC

prisma / mongo-rust-driver

MongoDB Rust Driver with some additional fixes

RustApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2024archivedforkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

prisma/mongo-rust-driver holds a health index of 14 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (66/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

14
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

14
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 39 is calibrated to 34 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PrismaOrganization · verified domain
4,940 followers201 public repossince Feb 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iomongodbpoints to another repo — not scored3.9.11,379,4661038 days agobsondatabasemongomongodbnosqlasynchronousweb-programming
crates.iomongodb-internal-macrospoints to another repo — not scored3.9.11,269,094258 days ago—
crates.ioupdate_versionpoints to another repo — not scored1.1.020471 days agocargoclisemvertauriversiondevelopment-toolscommand-line-utilities

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

17Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 759 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push759
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

40Weak
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 19 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,446 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~68 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count19
latest_release_tagv2.3.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release1,446
mean_days_between_releases68
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

75Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 54 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled54
top_contributor_share0.295

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 4,940 followers of prisma
25/25Track record — 201 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,940
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginprisma
public_repos201
account_age_days3,870

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([lints]), clippy.toml, rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://www.mongodb.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 87 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://www.mongodb.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.87
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

62Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — src/test/spec/json/unified-test-format/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([lints]), clippy.toml, rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filessrc/test/spec/json/unified-test-format/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests.evergreen/aws-ecs-test/Cargo.toml, .evergreen/aws-lambda-test/mongodb/Cargo.toml, .evergreen/azure-kms-test/Cargo.toml, .evergreen/generate-tasks/Cargo.toml, Cargo.toml, benchmarks/Cargo.toml, etc/change_stream_legacy/Cargo.toml, etc/update_version/Cargo.toml, etc/wasmedge/Cargo.toml, macros/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 3/310 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes112,142
source_files_sampled310
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

1GitHub stars
54contributors
0commits, last 12 months
759days since last push
19releases
3bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • crates package 'mongodb' points at a different repository (https://github.com/mongodb/mongo-rust-driver); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'mongodb-internal-macros' points at a different repository (https://github.com/mongodb/mongo-rust-driver); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'wasmedge_mongodb' from its registry
  • crates package 'update_version' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Drew-Chase/update-version); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'aws-ecs-test' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'change_stream_legacy' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'azure-kms-test' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'generate-tasks' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 20:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 67
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioasync-trait0.1.42Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.13.0Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags1.1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iobson2.11.0Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.7Cargo.toml
crates.ioderivative2.1.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_more0.99.17Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21.0Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-io0.3.21Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-core0.3.14Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3.14Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.14Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4.0Cargo.toml
crates.iohickory-proto0.24.1Cargo.toml
crates.iohickory-resolver0.24.1Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac0.12.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.19.0Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4.17Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-50.10.1Cargo.toml
crates.iomongocrypt0.2.0Cargo.toml
crates.iomongodb-internal-macros3.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.ionum_cpus1.13.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioopenssl0.10.38Cargo.toml
crates.ioopenssl-probe0.1.5Cargo.toml
crates.iopercent-encoding2.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8.3Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.5.3Cargo.toml
crates.iorustc_version_runtime0.3.0Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-pemfile1.0.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_with3.8.1Cargo.toml
crates.iosha-10.10.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10.2Cargo.toml
crates.iosnap1.0.5Cargo.toml
crates.iosocket20.5.5Cargo.toml
crates.iostringprep0.1.2Cargo.toml
crates.iostrsim0.11.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotake_mut0.2.2Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1.0.24Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-openssl0.6.3Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.36Cargo.toml
crates.iotyped-builder0.10.0Cargo.toml
crates.iowebpki-roots0.25.2Cargo.toml
crates.iozstd0.11.2Cargo.toml
crates.iopbkdf20.11.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.11.2Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls0.21.6Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.125Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_bytes0.11.5Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.17.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-rustls0.24.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util0.7.0Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.1.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.78macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0.35macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0.52macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.0.2.evergreen/aws-ecs-test/Cargo.toml
crates.iomongodb—.evergreen/aws-ecs-test/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.28.1.evergreen/azure-kms-test/Cargo.toml
crates.iomongodb—.evergreen/azure-kms-test/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0etc/change_stream_legacy/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_with1.11etc/change_stream_legacy/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yaml0.8etc/change_stream_legacy/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap3.0.13etc/change_stream_legacy/Cargo.toml
crates.ioargh0.1.12etc/update_version/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.10.2etc/update_version/Cargo.toml
crates.iomongodb—etc/wasmedge/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1etc/wasmedge/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 0

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies to assess

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with prisma/mongo-rust-driver. Read them side by side →

100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100risingwavelabs/risingwaveEvent streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.Exceptional100wandb/wandbThe AI developer platform. Use Weights & Biases to train and fine-tune models, and manage models from experimentation to production.Exceptional100scalar/scalarScalar is an open-source API platform:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　🌐 Modern REST API Client　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　📖 Beautiful API References　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　✨ 1st-Class OpenAPI/Swagger SupportExceptional100envoyproxy/envoyCloud-native high-performance edge/middle/service proxyExceptional99open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rustThe Rust OpenTelemetry implementationExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.