Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 07:48 UTC

provide-io / provide-testkit

PythonApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryPluginhow this is determined

provide-io/provide-testkit holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

provide.ioOrganization · verified domain

2 followers24 public repossince Mar 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	provide-testkit	0.5.3	4,278	17	8 days ago	testing fixtures mocking pytest provide

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 8 days ago
15.2/36	Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 361 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	361
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	8
active_weeks_last_year	22

Release discipline

98Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~1.9 days
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	14
latest_release_tag	v0.5.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	8
mean_days_between_releases	1.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 0 stars
0/25	Forks — 0 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	0
stars	0
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate

How it's scored

48.4/80	Monthly downloads — 4,278 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	provide-testkit
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	4,278
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	1
top_contributor_share	1

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30	PR acceptance — 15/15 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	15
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	14
prs_decided_30d	14
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	0
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
3.4/25	Owner reach — 2 followers of provide-io
15.2/25	Track record — 24 public repos, account ~2 yr old

Inputs used

followers	2
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	provide-io
public_repos	24
account_age_days	922

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20	Version history — 17 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	provide-testkit
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

70Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://foundry.provide.io/testkit/
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	https://foundry.provide.io/testkit/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5	Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	42
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:provide-testkit@0.5.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 42 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

79Good

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.6/40	Legible commit history — 63 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.63
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	8,606

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

62Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — src/provide/testkit/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	src/provide/testkit/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/provide/testkit/py.typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/160 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	29,031
source_files_sampled	160
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars

1contributors

361commits, last 12 months

8days since last push

14releases

1bus factor

0open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10

5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 07:48 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
8	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
8	Signed-Releases	5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 9

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	provide-foundation	`>=0.4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	attrs	`>=25.4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	click	`>=8.3.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pytest	`>=9.0.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`>=1.3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pytest-cov	`>=6.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pytest-mock	`>=3.15.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`>=3.8.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	mkdocs-material	`>=9.7.1`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 211

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 202 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	direct
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	direct
PyPI	mkdocs-material	`9.7.7`	direct
PyPI	provide-foundation	`0.4.3`	direct
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	direct
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.4.0`	direct
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	direct
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	direct
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	direct
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-tarfile	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-zstd	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	backrefs	`8.0`	indirect
PyPI	bandit	`1.9.4`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	behave	`1.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	boolean-py	`5.0`	indirect
PyPI	bracex	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	csscompressor	`0.9.5`	indirect
PyPI	cucumber-expressions	`20.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	cucumber-tag-expressions	`11.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	dataclasses-json	`0.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	dnspython	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.23`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.32.4`	indirect
PyPI	freezegun	`1.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	ghp-import	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	indirect
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.61`	indirect
PyPI	griffe	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	griffecli	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	griffelib	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	grpc-stubs	`1.53.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio	`1.83.1`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio-health-checking	`1.83.1`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio-tools	`1.83.1`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	h2	`4.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	hatch	`1.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	hatchling	`1.32.0`	indirect
PyPI	hjson	`3.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	hpack	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	htmlmin2	`0.1.13`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore2	`2.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2	`2.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2-jsfetch	`1.0`	indirect
PyPI	hyperframe	`6.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	hyperlink	`21.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	hypothesis	`6.167.1`	indirect
PyPI	id	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.19`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.19`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`9.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	interrogate	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-classes	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-context	`6.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	jeepney	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	jsmin	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	keyring	`25.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	libcst	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	license-expression	`30.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	linkchecker	`10.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	linkify-it-py	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	mando	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-callouts	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-exec	`1.12.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-include	`0.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdownify	`1.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	marshmallow	`3.26.2`	indirect
PyPI	marshmallow-enum	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	mdformat	`0.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	mdformat-tables	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdit-py-plugins	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	memray	`1.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	mergedeep	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	mike	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-autorefs	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-coverage	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-gen-files	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-get-deps	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin	`1.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-htmlproofer-plugin	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin	`7.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-literate-nav	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-llmstxt	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-macros-plugin	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material-extensions	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-minify-plugin	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-redirects	`1.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-section-index	`0.3.12`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings	`1.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings-python	`2.0.7`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`11.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	mutmut	`3.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nh3	`0.3.7`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	objprint	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	paginate	`0.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	parse	`1.22.1`	indirect
PyPI	parse-type	`0.6.6`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.11.5`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	properdocs	`1.6.7`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`7.36.0`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	py	`1.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	py-cpuinfo2	`10.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`11.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyre-check	`0.9.23`	indirect
PyPI	pyre-extensions	`0.0.32`	indirect
PyPI	pyrefly	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyright	`1.1.411`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-benchmark	`5.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-httpx	`0.36.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-json-report	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-metadata	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-testmon	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-debian	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-magic	`0.4.27`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml-env-tag	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml-ft	`8.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	radon	`6.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	readme-renderer	`46.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	reuse	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3986	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.16.5`	indirect
PyPI	sapp	`0.4`	indirect
PyPI	secretstorage	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	setproctitle	`1.3.7`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`84.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	shellingham	`1.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	sortedcontainers	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	stevedore	`5.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	structlog	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	super-collections	`0.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	tabulate	`0.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	termcolor	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	testslide	`2.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	textual	`8.2.8`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomli-w	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	trove-classifiers	`2026.6.1.19`	indirect
PyPI	truststore	`0.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	twine	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	ty	`0.0.75`	indirect
PyPI	typeguard	`2.13.3`	indirect
PyPI	types-click	`7.1.8`	indirect
PyPI	types-cryptography	`3.3.23.2`	indirect
PyPI	types-grpcio	`1.83.0.20260730`	indirect
PyPI	types-protobuf	`7.35.1.20260827`	indirect
PyPI	types-psutil	`7.2.2.20260827`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20260815`	indirect
PyPI	types-toml	`0.10.8.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspect	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.3`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	userpath	`1.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	uv	`0.12.7`	indirect
PyPI	verspec	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.7.7`	indirect
PyPI	viztracer	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcmatch	`11.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:provide-testkit@0.5.3 pulls in 42 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records