Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-13 20:04 UTC

puddly / serialx

Serial library with native async support for Linux, macOS, Windows, and WebSerial

PythonApache-2.0★ 34 stars⑂ 11 forkssince Aug 2022View on GitHub ↗

puddly/serialx holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (53/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

puddlyPersonal account

87 followers113 public repossince Oct 2017@OpenHomeFoundation / @home-assistant

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
PyPI	serialx	1.13.0	101,035	37	0 days ago
PyPI	serialx-compat	1.13.0	164	22	0 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

86Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
21.5/36	Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 126 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	126
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	31

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 37 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~17.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	37
latest_release_tag	v1.13.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	17.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

36Weak

How it's scored

24.6/60	Stars — 34 stars
8.3/25	Forks — 11 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	11
stars	34
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

83Excellent

How it's scored

66.7/80	Monthly downloads — 101,199 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	serialx, serialx-compat
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	101,199
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	11
top_contributor_share	0.894

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.3/30	PR acceptance — 123/126 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

merged_prs	123
open_issues	0
closed_issues	12
prs_merged_7d	13
prs_decided_7d	14
prs_merged_30d	20
prs_decided_30d	21
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	3
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14/25	Owner reach — 87 followers of puddly
25/25	Track record — 113 public repos, account ~9 yr old

Inputs used

followers	87
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	puddly
public_repos	113
account_age_days	3,295

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 37 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	serialx, serialx-compat
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://puddly.github.io/serialx/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	pyodide, python, serial, webserial
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://puddly.github.io/serialx/
docs_site	https://puddly.github.io/serialx/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

58Moderate

How it's scored

6.8/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5	Code-Review — Found 12/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

64Moderate

How it's scored

14/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: pyo3 0.23.5 (high 7.5)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 560 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	11
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	201
unassessed_packages	4
affected_by_severity	high 2
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 201 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 91 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.91
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

75Good

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, tests/data/usbip-cp2102/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
11/11	Static type checking — serialx/py.typed, serialx_compat/serial/py.typed, tests/data/pyodide/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	serialx/py.typed, serialx_compat/serial/py.typed, tests/data/pyodide/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, tests/data/usbip-cp2102/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (serialx/py.typed, serialx_compat/serial/py.typed, tests/data/pyodide/tsconfig.json)
54.2/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/73 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	62,106
source_files_sampled	73
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

34GitHub stars

11contributors

126commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

37releases

1bus factor

0open issues

crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch crates package 'serialx' from its registry
deps.dev does not index pypi:serialx@1.13.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 11 ⇿

0Stars

11Forks

23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 12Patch 10

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10

5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-13 20:04 UTC

9	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4	Code-Review	Found 12/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
8	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
4	Vulnerabilities	6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 5

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	pyo3	`>=0.23,<0.30`	Cargo.toml
PyPI	typing-extensions	`>=4.13.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	async-timeout	`>=3.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pywin32	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	serialx	`—`	serialx_compat/pyproject.toml

All dependencies 205

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 201 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	pyo3	`0.23.5`	direct
PyPI	async-timeout	`5.0.1`	direct
PyPI	pywin32	`312`	direct
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	direct
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`1.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	bytes	`1.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.6.7`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.7`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.6.7`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation	`0.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	defmt	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	defmt-macros	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	defmt-parser	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	env_filter	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	env_logger	`0.11.11`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	indoc	`2.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	io-kit-sys	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	jiff	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	jiff-core	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	jiff-static	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.178`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.189`	indirect
crates.io	libudev	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	libudev-sys	`0.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.34`	indirect
crates.io	mach2	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	memoffset	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	mio	`1.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	nix	`0.26.4`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.3`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	pkg-config	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic-util	`0.2.8`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.103`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.107`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-build-config	`0.23.5`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-ffi	`0.23.5`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros	`0.23.5`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros-backend	`0.23.5`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.40`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.47`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.18`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.11`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serialport	`4.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	signal-hook-registry	`1.4.8`	indirect
crates.io	socket2	`0.6.5`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.111`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.119`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`3.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	target-lexicon	`0.12.16`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.17`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.21`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.17`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.21`	indirect
crates.io	tokio	`1.53.1`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-macros	`2.7.2`	indirect
crates.io	unescaper	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.26`	indirect
crates.io	unindent	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.52.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
npm	@types/bun	`^1.3.13`	indirect
npm	@types/w3c-web-serial	`^1.0.8`	indirect
npm	pyodide	`^0.29.3`	indirect
PyPI	accessible-pygments	`0.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	aioesphomeapi	`46.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	alabaster	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`4.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	async-interrupt	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-asyncio-runner	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-zstd	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	chacha20poly1305-reuseable	`0.13.2`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	codespell	`2.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.16.2`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`48.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.22.4`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	furo	`2025.12.19`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.20`	indirect
PyPI	ifaddr	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	imagesize	`2.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`9.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	mccabe	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdit-py-plugins	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	myst-parser	`4.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	myst-parser	`5.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	noiseprotocol	`0.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.12.4`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	prek	`0.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`7.36.2`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pylint	`4.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-github-actions-annotate-failures	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-timeout	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	roman-numerals	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	semantic-version	`2.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`—`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`84.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools-rust	`1.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	snowballstemmer	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.10`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`8.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`9.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`9.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autobuild	`2024.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autobuild	`2025.8.25`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-basic-ng	`1.0.0b2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-applehelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-devhelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jsmath	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-qthelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	types-psutil	`7.2.2.20260906`	indirect
PyPI	types-pywin32	`312.0.0.20261006`	indirect
PyPI	types-setuptools	`84.0.0.20261006`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.5`	indirect
PyPI	tzlocal	`5.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	uv	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.54.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`17.2`	indirect
PyPI	zeroconf	`0.151.5`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 201 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
pyo3	`0.23.5`	direct	high	5	`0.29.0`
cryptography	`48.0.1`	indirect	high	6	`50.0.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records