Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 03:02 UTC

pulumi / pulumi-policy

Pulumi's Policy as Code SDK, CrossGuard. Define infrastructure checks in code to enforce security, compliance, cost, and other practices, enforced at deployment time.

TypeScript · PythonApache-2.0★ 44 stars⑂ 10 forkssince May 2019View on GitHub ↗

pulumi/pulumi-policy holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (80/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (59/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PulumiOrganization
1,310 followers428 public repossince Sep 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 7 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence14/52 weeks with commits
15.8/18Commit volume56 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained15 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year56
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases29 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 61 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~65.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count29
latest_release_tagv1.21.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release61
mean_days_between_releases65.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.5/60Stars44 stars
8/25Forks10 forks
7.2/15Watchers21 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars44
watchers21
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth23 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled23
top_contributor_share0.401
How it's scored
31.8/42Issue resolution76% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance179/205 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs179
open_issues57
closed_issues177
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.756
closed_unmerged_prs26
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
22.4/25Owner reach1,310 followers of pulumi
25/25Track record428 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,310
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginpulumi
public_repos428
account_age_days3,606
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.js, .pylintrc
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.pulumi.com/docs/guides/crossguard/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspulumi, policy, typescript, python, policy-as-code, javascript
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.pulumi.com/docs/guides/crossguard/
docs_sitehttps://www.pulumi.com/docs/guides/crossguard/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained15 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories8
affected_packages2
assessed_packages93
unassessed_packages27
affected_by_severitymoderate 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 93 resolved dependencies against OSV. 27 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap.mise.toml, Makefile, sdk/nodejs/policy/Makefile, sdk/python/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.js, .pylintrc
11/11Static type checkingsdk/nodejs/policy/tsconfig.json, sdk/python/lib/pulumi_policy/py.typed, sdk/python/mypy.ini, tests/integration/config/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/config/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/deserialize/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/deserialize/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/enforcementlevel/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/enforcementlevel/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/invalid_policy/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/invalid_policy/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/parent_dependencies/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/parent_dependencies/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/provider/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/provider/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/remote_component/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/resource_options/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/resource_options/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/runtime_data/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/runtime_data/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/stack_tags/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/stack_tags/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/unknown_values/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/unknown_values/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_python_resource/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_resource/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_resource/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_stack/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_stack/program/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files.mise.toml, Makefile, sdk/nodejs/policy/Makefile, sdk/python/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssdk/nodejs/policy/tsconfig.json, sdk/python/lib/pulumi_policy/py.typed, sdk/python/mypy.ini, tests/integration/config/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/config/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/deserialize/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/deserialize/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/enforcementlevel/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/enforcementlevel/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/invalid_policy/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/invalid_policy/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/parent_dependencies/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/parent_dependencies/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/provider/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/provider/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/remote_component/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/resource_options/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/resource_options/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/runtime_data/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/runtime_data/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/stack_tags/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/stack_tags/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/unknown_values/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/unknown_values/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_python_resource/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_resource/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_resource/program/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_stack/policy-pack/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/validate_stack/program/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes1/83 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes61,170
source_files_sampled83
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

44GitHub stars
23contributors
56commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
29releases
2bus factor
57open issues
package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 03:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 120

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 120 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aead/chacha20v0.0.0-20180709150244-8b13a72661daindirect
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v13v13.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/atotto/clipboardv0.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/blang/semverv3.5.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv0.16.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav0.24.2indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv0.7.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cheggaaa/pbv1.0.29indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/consolev1.0.4-0.20230313162750-1ae8d489ac81indirect
Gogithub.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoinv0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/djherbis/timesv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/emirpasic/godsv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/gcfgv1.5.1-0.20230307220236-3a3c6141e376indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/glog1.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/glogv1.2.5indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-opentracingv0.0.0-20180507213350-8e809c8a8645indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.17.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jbenet/go-contextv0.0.0-20150711004518-d14ea06fba99indirect
Gogithub.com/kevinburke/ssh_configv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.19indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-localereaderv0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.15indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-psv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/ansiv0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/reflowv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.15.2indirect
Gogithub.com/opentracing/basictracer-gov1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opentracing/opentracing-gov1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pgavlin/fxv0.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/pjbgf/sha1cdv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/termv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/pulumi/appdashv0.0.0-20231130102222-75f619a67231indirect
Gogithub.com/pulumi/escv0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pulumi/pulumi-random/sdk/v4v4.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/v3v3.100.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pulumi/pulumi/sdk/v33.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pulumi/pulumi/sdk/v33.157.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pulumi/pulumi/sdk/v3v3.100.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.4indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internal1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sabhiram/go-gitignorev0.0.0-20210923224102-525f6e181f06indirect
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v5v5.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.3.2-0.20230802210424-5b0b94c5c0d3indirect
Gogithub.com/skeema/knownhostsv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/texttheater/golang-levenshteinv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tweekmonster/luserv0.0.0-20161003172636-3fa38070dbd7indirect
Gogithub.com/uber/jaeger-client-gov2.30.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/uber/jaeger-libv2.4.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/xanzy/ssh-agentv0.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.13.2indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.10.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260410095643-746e56fc9e2findirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20251202230838-ff82c1b0f217indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.79.3indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.10indirect
Gogopkg.in/warnings.v0v0.1.2indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Golukechampine.com/frandv1.4.2indirect
npm@grpc/grpc-js^1.10.1indirect
npm@pulumi/aws^4.0.0indirect
npm@pulumi/policylatestindirect
npm@pulumi/pulumi^3.0.0indirect
npm@pulumi/pulumi^3.204.0indirect
npm@pulumi/random4.0.0indirect
npm@pulumi/random^4.0.0indirect
npm@pulumi/random^4.3.1indirect
npm@types/mocha^2.2.42indirect
npm@types/node^10.0.0indirect
npm@types/node^10.12.7indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^2.31.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^2.31.0indirect
npmeslint^6.8.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-header^3.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import^2.20.2indirect
npmgoogle-protobuf^3.21.4indirect
npmistanbul^0.4.5indirect
npmmocha^3.5.0indirect
npmtypescript^3.7.5indirect
PyPIgrpcioindirect
PyPImypyindirect
PyPIprotobufindirect
PyPIpulumiindirect
PyPIpulumi-awsindirect
PyPIpulumi-randomindirect
PyPIpylintindirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
PyPItypes-protobufindirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 93 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 27 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/netv0.54.0indirectmoderate70.55.0
golang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirectunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.