Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-29 14:50 UTC

pydantic / jiter

Fast iterable JSON parser.

RustMIT★ 545 stars⑂ 66 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

pydantic/jiter holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (68/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PydanticOrganization · verified domain

2,990 followers83 public repossince Aug 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	jiter	0.16.0	1,771,384	33	61 days ago	deserialization iter json parsing parser-implementations
PyPI	jiter	0.16.0	424,718,655	21	61 days ago	—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.1/36	Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
15/18	Commit volume — 46 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	46
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	16

Release discipline

83Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 33 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 61 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~52.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	33
latest_release_tag	v0.16.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	61
mean_days_between_releases	52.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

63Moderate

How it's scored

44.4/60	Stars — 545 stars
15.1/25	Forks — 66 forks
3.9/15	Watchers — 6 watchers

Inputs used

forks	66
stars	545
watchers	6
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 426,490,039 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	jiter, jiter
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates, pypi
total_downloads	21,524,877
monthly_downloads	426,490,039
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	27
top_contributor_share	0.543

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

30.2/42	Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
26.7/30	PR acceptance — 193/217 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	193
open_issues	14
closed_issues	36
prs_merged_7d	4
prs_decided_7d	4
prs_merged_30d	10
prs_decided_30d	11
issue_closed_ratio	0.72
closed_unmerged_prs	24
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

96Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 2,990 followers of pydantic
21.1/25	Track record — 83 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	2,990
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	pydantic
public_repos	83
account_age_days	1,482

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 61 days ago
20/20	Version history — 33 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	jiter, jiter
ecosystems	crates, pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	61

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .rustfmt.toml, crates/jiter-python/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/jiter/Cargo.toml ([lints]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://crates.io/crates/jiter
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	json, json-parser, pydantic, rust
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://crates.io/crates/jiter
docs_site	https://crates.io/crates/jiter
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

64Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5	Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
2.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	18
affected_packages	6
assessed_packages	200
unassessed_packages	14
affected_by_severity	high 3, moderate 2, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 200 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 93 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.93
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .rustfmt.toml, crates/jiter-python/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/jiter/Cargo.toml ([lints]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
8/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.04
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, crates/fuzz/Cargo.toml, crates/jiter-python/Cargo.toml, crates/jiter/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.2/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/31 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	66,852
source_files_sampled	31
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

545GitHub stars

27contributors

46commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

33releases

1bus factor

14open issues

crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch pypi package 'jiter-workspace' from its registry
Could not fetch crates package 'jiter-python' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 66 ⇿

0Stars

66Forks

28Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 16Patch 11

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10

6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-29 14:49 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
10	Fuzzing	project is fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	20 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
8	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3	Vulnerabilities	7 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	pyo3	`—`	crates/jiter-python/Cargo.toml
crates.io	jiter	`—`	crates/jiter-python/Cargo.toml
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.4.4`	crates/jiter/Cargo.toml
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.16`	crates/jiter/Cargo.toml
crates.io	ahash	`0.8.0`	crates/jiter/Cargo.toml
crates.io	smallvec	`1.11.0`	crates/jiter/Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3	`—`	crates/jiter/Cargo.toml
crates.io	lexical-parse-float	`1.0.5`	crates/jiter/Cargo.toml
crates.io	bitvec	`1.0.1`	crates/jiter/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0.147`	crates/jiter/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 214

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 199 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	ahash	`—`	direct
crates.io	ahash	`0.8.12`	direct
crates.io	bitvec	`—`	direct
crates.io	bitvec	`1.1.1`	direct
crates.io	lexical-parse-float	`—`	direct
crates.io	lexical-parse-float	`1.0.6`	direct
crates.io	num-bigint	`—`	direct
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.4.8`	direct
crates.io	num-traits	`—`	direct
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	direct
crates.io	pyo3	`0.29.2`	direct
crates.io	serde	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.229`	direct
crates.io	smallvec	`—`	direct
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.2`	direct
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anes	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.104`	indirect
crates.io	approx	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	bit-set	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	bit-vec	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.20.3`	indirect
crates.io	cast	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.4.4`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	cfg_aliases	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-io	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	ciborium-ll	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.6.6`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.6`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	codspeed	`5.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	codspeed-criterion-compat	`—`	indirect
crates.io	codspeed-criterion-compat	`5.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	codspeed-criterion-compat-walltime	`5.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	colored	`3.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	criterion-plot	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.20`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.22`	indirect
crates.io	crunchy	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	funty	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	glob	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	half	`2.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	hermit-abi	`0.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`—`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	is-terminal	`0.4.17`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.10.5`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.104`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-parse-integer	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-util	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.189`	indirect
crates.io	libfuzzer-sys	`—`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	nix	`0.31.3`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.47`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	oorandom	`11.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	paste	`—`	indirect
crates.io	paste	`1.0.15`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	plotters	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-backend	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	plotters-svg	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.107`	indirect
crates.io	proptest	`—`	indirect
crates.io	proptest	`1.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-build-config	`0.29.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-ffi	`0.29.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros	`0.29.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros-backend	`0.29.2`	indirect
crates.io	quick-error	`1.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.47`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	radium	`0.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	rand_xorshift	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon	`1.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon-core	`1.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.18`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.11`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.23`	indirect
crates.io	rusty-fork	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.151`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	statrs	`0.18.0`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.119`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`3.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	tap	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	target-lexicon	`0.13.5`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`3.27.0`	indirect
crates.io	tinytemplate	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	unarray	`0.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	wait-timeout	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.4+wasi-0.2.12`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.127`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.127`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.127`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.127`	indirect
crates.io	web-sys	`0.3.104`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.57.1`	indirect
crates.io	wyz	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.56`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.56`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.23`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	auditwheel-emscripten	`0.0.16`	indirect
PyPI	auditwheel-emscripten	`0.2.5`	indirect
PyPI	build	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.6.17`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	cloudpickle	`3.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	cmake	`4.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	cython	`0.29.37`	indirect
PyPI	dirty-equals	`0.11`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.29.4`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jiter-workspace	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	leb128	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	loky	`3.5.6`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	maturin	`—`	indirect
PyPI	maturin	`1.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.11.5`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.11.8`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.0`	indirect
PyPI	pep517	`0.13.1`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`1.10.26`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyodide-build	`0.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyodide-build	`0.23.4`	indirect
PyPI	pyodide-build	`0.35.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyodide-cli	`0.2.4`	indirect
PyPI	pyodide-cli	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyodide-lock	`0.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`8.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-pretty	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	resolvelib	`1.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`14.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`0.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.9`	indirect
PyPI	shellingham	`1.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	typer	`0.26.7`	indirect
PyPI	types-requests	`2.33.0.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	ujson	`5.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	ujson	`5.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	unearth	`0.18.2`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	wheel	`0.47.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 200 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
orjson	`3.11.5`	indirect	high	1	`3.11.6`
ujson	`5.11.0`	indirect	high	8	`5.13.0`
ujson	`5.12.0`	indirect	high	4	`5.13.0`
pytest	`8.4.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`9.0.3`
pytest	`9.0.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`9.0.3`
paste	`1.0.15`	indirect	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records