Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 02:47 UTC

pyth-network / pyth-lazer-public

Pyth Pro SDKs and apps

Rust · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 4 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

pyth-network/pyth-lazer-public holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Security (19/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 5 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Pyth NetworkOrganization · verified domain
834 followers45 public repossince Dec 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.iopyth-lazer-agent0.16.0562344 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
27.7/36Commit cadence — 40/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 440 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year440
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year40
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 46 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagpyth-js-v155
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release46
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

26At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars1
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
23.4/80Monthly downloads — 56 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespyth-lazer-agent
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads3,701
monthly_downloads56
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
45.9/54Bus factor — 5 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 18% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor5
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.176
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
20/30PR acceptance — 4/6 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs4
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
21/25Owner reach — 834 followers of pyth-network
23.6/25Track record — 45 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers834
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginpyth-network
public_repos45
account_age_days2,105

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 44 days ago
20/20Version history — 23 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespyth-lazer-agent
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish44

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), agent/Cargo.toml ([lints]), biome.json, clippy.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/pyth-lazer-agent
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/pyth-lazer-agent
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

19Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 98 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.8
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier19
security_posture_before_jurisdiction38
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

71Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — contracts/stellar/Makefile, mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), agent/Cargo.toml ([lints]), biome.json, clippy.toml
11/11Static type checking — contracts/solana/tsconfig.json, contracts/stellar/scripts/e2e/tsconfig.json, sdk/js-solana/tsconfig.json, sdk/js/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filescontracts/stellar/Makefile, mise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configscontracts/solana/tsconfig.json, contracts/stellar/scripts/e2e/tsconfig.json, sdk/js-solana/tsconfig.json, sdk/js/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, agent/Cargo.toml, contracts/solana/Cargo.toml, contracts/solana/programs/pyth-lazer-solana-contract/Cargo.toml, contracts/solana_anchor_0_29_support_test/Cargo.toml, contracts/solana_anchor_0_29_support_test/programs/anchor_0_29_support_test/Cargo.toml, contracts/stellar/Cargo.toml, contracts/stellar/contracts/integration-tests/Cargo.toml, contracts/stellar/contracts/pyth-lazer-stellar/Cargo.toml, contracts/stellar/contracts/wormhole-executor-stellar/Cargo.toml, contracts/stellar/sdk/rust/Cargo.toml, publisher_sdk/rust/Cargo.toml, publishers/example-jrpc/Cargo.toml, publishers/example/Cargo.toml, sdk/rust/client/Cargo.toml, sdk/rust/protocol/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/112 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes58,547
source_files_sampled112
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — publisher_sdk/proto/dynamic_value.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/governance_instruction.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/publisher_update.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/pyth_lazer_transaction.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/state.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/transaction_envelope.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/types.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespublisher_sdk/proto/dynamic_value.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/governance_instruction.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/publisher_update.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/pyth_lazer_transaction.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/state.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/transaction_envelope.proto, publisher_sdk/proto/types.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
22contributors
440commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
1releases
5bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412026-032026-052026-07
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 02:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities98 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 33
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iopyth-lazer-protocol—agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyth-lazer-publisher-sdk—agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.98agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iobackoff0.4.0agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22.1agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iobincode2.0.1agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iocached—agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.5.32agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconfig0.15.11agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderivative2.2.0agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioed25519-dalek2.1.1agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3.31agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3.31agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp1.3.1agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp-body-util0.1.3agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iohumantime-serde1.1.1agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper1.6.0agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper-util0.1.10agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprotobuf3.7.2agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12.22agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.219agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-this-or-that0.5.0agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.140agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iosoketto0.8.1agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-keypair~3.0.0agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.44.1agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-native-tls0.3.1agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-tungstenite0.26.2agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util0.7.14agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.41agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.23agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iottl_cache0.5.1agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.5.4agent/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.