Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-09 07:38 UTC

pytorch / ignite

High-level library to help with training and evaluating neural networks in PyTorch flexibly and transparently.

PythonBSD-3-Clause★ 4,772 stars⑂ 713 forkssince Nov 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

pytorch/ignite holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (95/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

pytorchOrganization
13,479 followers70 public repossince Aug 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIpytorch-ignite0.5.5323,3602,40717 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 7 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume198 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year198
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases27 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 17 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~157.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count27
latest_release_tagv0.5.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release17
mean_days_between_releases157.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

92Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
59.7/60Stars4,772 stars
23.8/25Forks713 forks
9.7/15Watchers56 watchers
Inputs used
forks713
stars4,772
watchers56
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges17
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io, travis-ci.com
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
73.5/80Monthly downloads323,360 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespytorch-ignite
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads323,360
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

88Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 42% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth97 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.418
How it's scored
38.7/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
25.3/30PR acceptance1,895/2,246 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs1,895
open_issues115
closed_issues1,346
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.921
closed_unmerged_prs351
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach13,479 followers of pytorch
25/25Track record70 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers13,479
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginpytorch
public_repos70
account_age_days3,648
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 17 days ago
20/20Version history2,407 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespytorch-ignite
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows17 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://pytorch-ignite.ai
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspytorch, neural-network, python, machine-learning, deep-learning, metrics, hacktoberfest, closember
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://pytorch-ignite.ai
docs_sitehttps://pytorch-ignite.ai
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfilespublished library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles
manifestsdocs/requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, requirements-dev.txt
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:pytorch-ignite@0.5.5 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history97 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapdocs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingignite/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, Dockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsignite/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.11
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (ignite/py.typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes4/361 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes74,091
source_files_sampled361
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

4,772GitHub stars
97contributors
198commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
27releases
3bus factor
115open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (2026/08/09 07:36:59 Warning: PATs stored in env variables GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN and GITHUB_TOKEN differ. Scorecard will use the former.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 713 ⇿
0Stars
713Forks
27Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375500625750706142017-112022-032026-08
Major 0Minor 3Patch 20

Each point covers 8 days.

Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPItorch>=2.2,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIpackagingpyproject.toml
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 78 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIpackagingdirect
PyPIpackaging26.2direct
PyPItorchdirect
PyPItorch2.12.1direct
PyPIalbumentationsindirect
PyPIclearmlindirect
PyPIcuda-bindings13.3.1indirect
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.5.6indirect
PyPIcuda-toolkit13.0.2indirect
PyPIdatasetsindirect
PyPIdillindirect
PyPIdocutils0.19indirect
PyPIfairlearnindirect
PyPIfilelockindirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.4indirect
PyPIfireindirect
PyPIfsspec2026.6.0indirect
PyPIgymnasiumindirect
PyPIhatchlingindirect
PyPIimage-dataset-vizindirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlibindirect
PyPImlflow3.12.0indirect
PyPImpmathindirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPIneptune-clientindirect
PyPInetworkx3.4.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInltkindirect
PyPInumpyindirect
PyPInvidia-cublas13.1.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti13.0.85indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc13.0.88indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime13.0.96indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu139.20.0.48indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft12.0.0.61indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile1.15.1.6indirect
PyPInvidia-curand10.4.0.35indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver12.0.4.66indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse12.6.3.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu130.8.1indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu132.29.7indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink13.0.88indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu133.4.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx13.0.85indirect
PyPIopencv-python-headlessindirect
PyPIpandasindirect
PyPIpolyaxonindirect
PyPIpre-commitindirect
PyPIpy-config-runnerindirect
PyPIpycocotoolsindirect
PyPIpynvmlindirect
PyPIpyreflyindirect
PyPIpytestindirect
PyPIpytest-covindirect
PyPIpytest-orderindirect
PyPIpytest-timeoutindirect
PyPIpytest-xdistindirect
PyPIpytorch-igniteindirect
PyPIpytorch-sphinx-themeindirect
PyPIranxindirect
PyPIrayindirect
PyPIscikit-imageindirect
PyPIscikit-learnindirect
PyPIscipyindirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
PyPIsetuptools81.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinx7indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.4.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-designindirect
PyPIsphinx-togglebuttonindirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-katexindirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItensorboardindirect
PyPItensorboardxindirect
PyPItorchvisionindirect
PyPItqdmindirect
PyPItransformersindirect
PyPItriton3.7.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIwandbindirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:pytorch-ignite@0.5.5 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.