Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-26 12:28 UTC

pyx-industries / julee

Auditable. Maintainable. Enjoyable. Do The Thing!

PythonGPL-3.0★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Feb 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolPluginhow this is determined

pyx-industries/julee holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Pyx IndustriesOrganization
2 followers12 public repossince Mar 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIjulee0.11.02,677430 days agoclean-architecturedomain-driven-designbounded-contextframework

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 191 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year191
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 42 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count42
latest_release_tagv0.11.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate
How it's scored
45.7/80Monthly downloads — 2,677 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesjulee
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,677
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

21At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 63% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.634

Issue & PR responsiveness

63Moderate
How it's scored
26/42Issue resolution — 62% of issues closed
28.9/30PR acceptance — 183/190 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs183
open_issues38
closed_issues62
prs_merged_7d58
prs_decided_7d60
prs_merged_30d58
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.62
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of pyx-industries
15.3/25Track record — 12 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpyx-industries
public_repos12
account_age_days1,304

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 43 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjulee
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://julee.readthedocs.io
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://julee.readthedocs.io
docs_sitehttps://julee.readthedocs.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

53Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages120
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 120 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 91 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.91
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/julee/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/julee/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/julee/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/156 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes27,770
source_files_sampled156
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
3contributors
191commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
42releases
1bus factor
38open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index pypi:julee@0.11.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-26 12:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpydantic>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 120

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 119 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIpydantic2.13.5direct
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.15.1indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi25.1.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi-bindings26.1.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.11.2indirect
PyPIastroid4.3.2indirect
PyPIasyncpg0.31.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfactory-boy3.3.3indirect
PyPIfaker40.39.0indirect
PyPIfastapi0.141.1indirect
PyPIfastapi-pagination0.16.0indirect
PyPIfilelock4.0.3indirect
PyPIfuro2025.12.19indirect
PyPIgriffe1.15.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.168.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.20indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.1indirect
PyPIinflect7.5.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjulee0.11.0indirect
PyPIlibcst1.9.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPIlinkify-it-py2.2.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPIminio7.2.20indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImutmut3.8.0indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPInexus-rpc1.4.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.15indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.36.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.1indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-ft8.0.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.16.9indirect
PyPIsetproctitle1.3.7indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.10indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autoapi3.8.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2025.8.25indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.13.7indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.6.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-basic-ng1.0.0b2indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-mermaid2.1.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-plantuml0.31indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIstarlette1.7.0indirect
PyPIstevedore5.9.1indirect
PyPItemporalio1.33.0indirect
PyPItextual8.2.8indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItypeguard4.6.0indirect
PyPItypes-jsonschema4.26.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-protobuf7.35.1.20260906indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260807indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260906indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.4indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.54.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.12.1indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.3.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets17.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 120 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with pyx-industries/julee. Read them side by side →

97abpframework/abpOpen-source web application framework for ASP.NET Core! Offers an opinionated architecture to build enterprise software solutions with best practices on top of the .NET. Provides the fundamental infrastructure, cross-cutting-concern implementations, startup templates, application modules, UI themes, tooling and documentation.Exceptional93Rotorsoft/act-rootEvent-sourcing framework for TypeScript. Three primitives (actions, state, reactions), Zod end to end, no broker required. Postgres, SQLite, or in-memory.Exceptional91aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplateASP.NET Boilerplate - Web Application FrameworkExcellent90expressots/expressotsA Typescript + Node.js lightweight framework for quick building scalable, easy to read and maintain, server-side applications 🐎Excellent100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional100run-llama/llama_indexLlamaIndex is the document processing platform for AIExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.