Public record
Software health reportschema 0.17.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 07:46 UTC

qase-tms / qase-phpunit

Qase TMS PHPUnit reporter.

PHPApache-2.0★ 7 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Dec 2021View on GitHub ↗

qase-tms/qase-phpunit holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (83/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Qase TMSOrganization
85 followers92 public repossince Jun 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistqase/phpunit-reporter2.1.114,4342695 days agophpphpunitunitcommonreportertmsqase

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence11/52 weeks with commits
11.1/18Commit volume16 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year16
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases26 version tags (no GitHub releases)
27/36Release recencylatest release 95 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~33.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count26
latest_release_tagv2.1.11
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release95
mean_days_between_releases33.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars7 stars
6.5/25Forks7 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars7
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.6/80Monthly downloads4,434 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesqase/phpunit-reporter
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads74,693
monthly_downloads4,434
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 31% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth10 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.307
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
26.1/30PR acceptance54/62 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 15/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs54
open_issues0
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
13.9/25Owner reach85 followers of qase-tms
25/25Track record92 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers85
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginqase-tms
public_repos92
account_age_days2,589
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 95 days ago
20/20Version history26 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesqase/phpunit-reporter
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish95

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests18 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://developers.qase.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsqase, tms, reporter, php, phpunit
has_wikino
homepagehttps://developers.qase.io
docs_sitehttps://developers.qase.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests18 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 15/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories12
affected_packages3
assessed_packages77
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 77 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/49 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes18,294
source_files_sampled49
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

7GitHub stars
10contributors
16commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
26releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 7 ★ / 0 ⇿
7Stars

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

234567722021-122023-022024-04

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 07:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
6CI-Tests18 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 15/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistqase/php-commons^2.1.18composer.json
All dependencies 78

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 77 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistqase/php-commons2.1.20direct
Packagistbrick/math0.13.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.4.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.15.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.5.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises1.5.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.5.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.13.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.4.3indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.11.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.15.1indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.3indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage10.1.16indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.18indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator4.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker4.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template3.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit10.5.63indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.5.26indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistqase/api1.2.0indirect
Packagistqase/php-client-utils2.0.0indirect
Packagistqase/phpunit-reporterindirect
Packagistqase/qase-api-client1.1.10indirect
Packagistqase/qase-api-v2-client1.1.5indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.1.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.9.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff5.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/type4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/version4.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.0.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.1indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 77 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
phpunit/phpunit9.5.26indirecthigh112.5.8
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.5.0indirectmoderate77.15.1
guzzlehttp/psr72.4.3indirectmoderate42.12.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.17.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.