Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-02 03:36 UTC

quangdang46 / openproxy

Smart AI proxy router that connects Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot, and 50+ coding tools to 40+ AI providers with 100+ models. Saves 20-40% tokens via RTK compression, auto-fallback from subscription to cheap to free providers, multi-account round-robin, and a local dashboard.

Rust · TypeScriptNo license detected★ 9 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#ai-agents#ai-providers#ai-router#api-gateway#claude-code#cli-tools#codex#copilot#cursor#developer-tools#free-ai#multi-model#nextjs#npm-package#openai-api#proxy#quota-management#rate-limiting#rust#token-saver

quangdang46/openproxy holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (20/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Trần Quang ĐãngPersonal account
20 followers55 public repossince Sep 2021

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

73Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,030 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,030
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year28

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 3 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 20 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagv0.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release20
mean_days_between_releases3.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

20At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

15Critical
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars — 9 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars9
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

40Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 68% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 63 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled63
top_contributor_share0.675

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
20.6/30PR acceptance — 66/96 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs66
open_issues0
closed_issues208
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs30
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of quangdang46
22.4/25Track record — 55 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginquangdang46
public_repos55
account_age_days1,767
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, ai-providers, ai-router, api-gateway, claude-code, cli-tools, codex, copilot, cursor, developer-tools, free-ai, multi-model, nextjs, npm-package, openai-api, proxy, quota-management, rate-limiting, rust, token-saver
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

32At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

32At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 54 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,710

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

71Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 15 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsweb/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.15
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 12/588 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes177,921
source_files_sampled588
oversized_source_files12

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

9GitHub stars
63contributors
1,030commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'openproxy' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-02 03:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities54 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 99
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioaxum0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1Cargo.toml
crates.iotower0.5Cargo.toml
crates.iotower-http0.6Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper1.5Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper-util0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper-rustls0.27Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-rustls0.26Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls0.23Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap_complete4Cargo.toml
crates.iosimd-json0.14Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yml0.0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iojsonwebtoken9Cargo.toml
crates.iobcrypt0.15Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp-body-util0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util0.7Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap6Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioarc-swap1Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22Cargo.toml
crates.iosha10.10Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2561.6Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2Cargo.toml
crates.iourlencoding2Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_urlencoded0.7Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1Cargo.toml
crates.iodotenvy0.15Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-credential-types1Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-sigv41.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc32fast1.4Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iofnv1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iorusqlite0.32Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-stream0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iorsa0.9Cargo.toml
crates.iorcgen0.13Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-pemfile2Cargo.toml
crates.ioaes0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iocbc0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-50.10Cargo.toml
crates.iopkcs80.10Cargo.toml
crates.iotime0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iowhoami1Cargo.toml
crates.ionotify8Cargo.toml
crates.iodirectories5Cargo.toml
crates.iorust-embed8Cargo.toml
crates.iomime_guess2Cargo.toml
crates.ioopen5Cargo.toml
npm@astrojs/react^4.2.1web/package.json
npm@astrojs/tailwind^5.1.4web/package.json
npm@monaco-editor/react^4.7.0web/package.json
npm@xyflow/react^12.10.1web/package.json
npmastro^5.18.1web/package.json
npmbcryptjs^3.0.3web/package.json
npmconfbox^0.2.4web/package.json
npmexpress^5.2.1web/package.json
npmfs^0.0.1-securityweb/package.json
npmhttp-proxy-middleware^4.0.0web/package.json
npmjose^6.1.3web/package.json
npmlowdb^7.0.1web/package.json
npmmarked^18.0.1web/package.json
npmmaterial-symbols^0.44.8web/package.json
npmmonaco-editor^0.55.1web/package.json
npmnode-forge^1.3.3web/package.json
npmnode-machine-id^1.1.12web/package.json
npmopen^11.0.0web/package.json
npmora^9.1.0web/package.json
npmprop-types^15.8.1web/package.json
npmproper-lockfile^4.1.2web/package.json
npmreact19.2.4web/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.4web/package.json
npmreact-is^16.13.1web/package.json
npmrecharts^3.7.0web/package.json
npmselfsigned^5.5.0web/package.json
npmsocks-proxy-agent^10.0.0web/package.json
npmsql.js^1.14.1web/package.json
npmundici^7.19.2web/package.json
npmuuid^13.0.0web/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.10web/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with quangdang46/openproxy. Read them side by side →

98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional95sickn33/agentic-awesome-skillsAAS Core is the local, agent-first control plane for complete catalog discovery, agent-owned selection, stack validation, and planning, backed by 2,000+ agentic skills. Includes CLI, local MCP, catalog, plugins, and Workbench.Exceptional96microsoft/agent-governance-toolkitAI Agent Governance Toolkit — Policy enforcement, zero-trust identity, execution sandboxing, and reliability engineering for autonomous AI agents. Covers 10/10 OWASP Agentic Top 10.Exceptional97github/gh-awGitHub Agentic WorkflowsExceptional96e2b-dev/E2BOpen-source, secure environment with real-world tools for enterprise-grade agents.Exceptional95NousResearch/hermes-agentThe agent that grows with youExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.