Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 01:32 UTC

quantakrypto / pqc-tools

Open-source post-quantum readiness tooling by quantakrypto

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 11 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

quantakrypto/pqc-tools holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (46/100). It was last updated 19 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

@QuantaKryptoOrganization
3 followers8 public repossince Jun 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@quantakrypto/mcp0.12.03522030 days ago
npm@quantakrypto/core0.12.03641830 days ago
npm@quantakrypto/agent0.12.03121330 days ago
npm@quantakrypto/qscan0.12.02681830 days ago
npm@quantakrypto/sieve0.12.01721830 days ago
npm@quantakrypto/qprobe0.12.0209930 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 19 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 298 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year298
human_commit_share0.87
days_since_last_push19
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 30 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv0.12.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release30
mean_days_between_releases2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars — 11 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars11
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges13
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io, www.bestpractices.dev
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
43/80Monthly downloads — 1,677 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@quantakrypto/mcp, @quantakrypto/core, @quantakrypto/agent, @quantakrypto/qscan, @quantakrypto/sieve, @quantakrypto/qprobe
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,677
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
20.9/30PR acceptance — 53/76 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs53
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs23
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of quantakrypto
7.4/25Track record — 8 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginquantakrypto
public_repos8
account_age_days83

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 6 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history — 20 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@quantakrypto/mcp, @quantakrypto/core, @quantakrypto/agent, @quantakrypto/qscan, @quantakrypto/sieve, @quantakrypto/qprobe
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://quantakrypto.com/tools
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscrypto-agility, cryptography, harvest-now-decrypt-later, infosec, post-quantum, pqc, pqc-migration, pqc-readiness, pqcrypto, q-day, quantum, quantum-readiness, security-training, encryption-strategy, pqc-certification, cbom, mcp, post-quantum-cryptography, sbom, nist
has_wikino
homepagehttps://quantakrypto.com/tools
docs_sitehttps://quantakrypto.com/tools
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

83Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.2/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Passing
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 54 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@quantakrypto/mcp@0.12.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://quantakrypto.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 79 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://quantakrypto.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.908
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — packages/core/test/benchmark/recall/csharp/Acme.Signing.csproj, packages/core/test/benchmark/recall/go/go.mod, packages/core/test/benchmark/recall/java/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — packages/action/tsconfig.json, packages/agent/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/qprobe/tsconfig.json, packages/qscan/tsconfig.json, packages/sieve/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/action/tsconfig.json, packages/agent/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/qprobe/tsconfig.json, packages/qscan/tsconfig.json, packages/sieve/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspackages/core/test/benchmark/recall/csharp/Acme.Signing.csproj, packages/core/test/benchmark/recall/go/go.mod, packages/core/test/benchmark/recall/java/pom.xml, packages/core/test/benchmark/recall/rust/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.13
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/479 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes59,062
source_files_sampled479
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

11GitHub stars
1contributors
298commits, last 12 months
19days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.9 / 10
7.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 01:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Passing
0Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities54 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@quantakrypto/core0.12.0packages/action/package.json
npm@quantakrypto/qprobe0.12.0packages/action/package.json
npm@quantakrypto/qscan0.12.0packages/action/package.json
npm@quantakrypto/sieve0.12.0packages/action/package.json
npm@quantakrypto/core0.12.0packages/agent/package.json
npm@quantakrypto/core0.12.0packages/mcp/package.json
npm@quantakrypto/qprobe0.12.0packages/mcp/package.json
npm@quantakrypto/core0.12.0packages/qprobe/package.json
npm@quantakrypto/agent0.12.0packages/qscan/package.json
npm@quantakrypto/core0.12.0packages/qscan/package.json
npm@noble/post-quantum^0.4.0validation/sieve-real-sut/package.json
All dependencies 193

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 186 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@noble/post-quantum0.4.1direct
npm@noble/post-quantum0.6.1direct
npm@quantakrypto/agent0.12.0direct
npm@quantakrypto/core0.12.0direct
npm@quantakrypto/qprobe0.12.0direct
npm@quantakrypto/qscan0.12.0direct
npm@quantakrypto/sieve0.12.0direct
crates.ioanyhow—indirect
crates.ioed25519-dalek—indirect
crates.iohex—indirect
crates.ioopenssl—indirect
crates.iorsa—indirect
crates.ioserde—indirect
crates.ioserde_json—indirect
crates.iotokio—indirect
crates.iotracing—indirect
crates.iox25519-dalek—indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.3.9indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4v4.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.2.1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.24.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.21.0indirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.17.1indirect
Mavenio.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api0.11.5indirect
Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk18on1.78.1indirect
Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on1.78.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.7.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/js9.39.4indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@noble/ciphers2.2.0indirect
npm@noble/curves2.2.0indirect
npm@noble/hashes1.8.0indirect
npm@noble/hashes2.2.0indirect
npm@quantakrypto/action0.12.0indirect
npm@quantakrypto/mcp0.12.0indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node26.2.0indirect
npm@types/node^20.12.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.67.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.67.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.67.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.67.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.67.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.67.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.67.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.67.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.67.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.67.0indirect
npmacorn8.18.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmelliptic^6.5.4indirect
npmelliptic^6.5.5indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.8.1indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmexpress^4.18.0indirect
npmexpress^4.19.2indirect
npmfast-check4.9.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.6indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmjsonwebtoken^9.0.0indirect
npmjsonwebtoken^9.0.2indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash^4.17.21indirect
npmminimatch10.2.6indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnode-forge^1.3.1indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpino^9.2.0indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmprettier3.9.6indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmpure-rand8.4.2indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmtsx4.23.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript^5.4.5indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.67.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
NuGetBouncyCastle.Cryptography2.4.0indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3indirect
NuGetSystem.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt7.5.1indirect
PyPIcryptography—indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIfastapi0.110.1indirect
PyPIparamiko—indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.20.0indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.20.0indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.2.1indirect
PyPIpyjwt—indirect
PyPIpyopenssl—indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.0.1indirect
PyPIrequests—indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIstructlog24.1.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.29.0indirect
RubyGemsed25519—indirect
RubyGemsjwt—indirect
RubyGemsnet-ssh—indirect
RubyGemspg—indirect
RubyGemspuma—indirect
RubyGemsrails—indirect
RubyGemsrbnacl—indirect
RubyGemsrspec-rails—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@quantakrypto/mcp@0.12.0 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.