Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 17:19 UTC

quantfive / freecut

FreeCut is a professional-grade video editor that runs entirely in your browser. Professional video editing, zero installation. Create stunning videos with multi-track editing, keyframe animations, real-time preview, and high-quality exports.

TypeScriptMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

quantfive/freecut holds a health index of 45 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (69/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (25/100). It was last updated 30 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

45
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

45
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Q5Organization
3 followers70 public repossince Sep 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@quantfive/freecut-editor-surface0.3.175,4921740 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 30 days ago
28.4/36Commit cadence — 41/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,730 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,730
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push30
active_weeks_last_year41
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

25At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.9/80Monthly downloads — 5,492 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@quantfive/freecut-editor-surface
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads5,492
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.914
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
29.2/30PR acceptance — 38/39 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs38
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of quantfive
25/25Track record — 70 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginquantfive
public_repos70
account_age_days3,321

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 40 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@quantfive/freecut-editor-surface
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://freecut.net
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttp://freecut.net
docs_sitehttp://freecut.net
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,175
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — packages/freecut-editor/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configspackages/freecut-editor/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 27/2,577 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes866,642
source_files_sampled2,577
oversized_source_files27

Key facts

0GitHub stars
4contributors
2,730commits, last 12 months
30days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 17:19 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 4/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 51
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@hookform/resolvers5.2.2package.json
npm@huggingface/transformers4.1.0package.json
npm@lottiefiles/dotlottie-web0.76.0package.json
npm@mediabunny/aac-encoder1.50.8package.json
npm@mediabunny/ac31.50.8package.json
npm@mediabunny/mp3-encoder1.50.8package.json
npm@mediabunny/prores1.50.8package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-accordion1.2.12package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-alert-dialog1.1.15package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-collapsible1.1.12package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-context-menu2.2.16package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog1.1.15package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu2.1.16package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-label2.1.8package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-popover1.1.15package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-progress1.1.8package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-scroll-area1.2.10package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select2.2.6package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-separator1.1.8package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slider1.3.6package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot1.2.4package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-switch1.2.6package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tabs1.1.13package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip1.2.8package.json
npm@tanstack/react-router1.168.22package.json
npm@tanstack/react-virtual3.13.24package.json
npmclass-variance-authority0.7.1package.json
npmclsx2.1.1package.json
npmfflate0.8.2package.json
npmgifuct-js2.1.2package.json
npmi18next25.6.0package.json
npmi18next-browser-languagedetector8.2.0package.json
npmidb8.0.3package.json
npmkokoro-js1.2.1package.json
npmlucide-react0.468.0package.json
npmmediabunny1.50.8package.json
npmmotion12.40.0package.json
npmonnxruntime-web1.26.0-dev.20260410-5e55544225package.json
npmreact19.2.5package.json
npmreact-colorful5.6.1package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.5package.json
npmreact-hook-form7.72.1package.json
npmreact-hotkeys-hook5.2.4package.json
npmreact-i18next16.2.4package.json
npmreact-resizable-panels3.0.6package.json
npmsonner2.0.7package.json
npmtailwind-merge2.6.1package.json
npmtailwindcss-animate1.0.7package.json
npmzod4.3.6package.json
npmzundo2.3.0package.json
npmzustand5.0.12package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.