Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-06 17:54 UTC

radommaciej / idb-orm

IndexedDb ORM, based built dexie

TypeScript · Svelte · HTMLNo license detected★ 447 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Sep 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

radommaciej/idb-orm holds a health index of 29 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (53/100) and lowest on Vitality (16/100). It was last updated 36 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

29
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

29
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 35 is calibrated to 29 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

radommaciejPersonal account
3 followers3 public repossince Sep 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@indexeddb-orm/idb-orm0.0.4120,969436 days agodexieormtypescriptzodvalidationindexeddb

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

16Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 36 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
7/18Commit volume — 5 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year5
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push36
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
43/60Stars — 447 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars447
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
67.8/80Monthly downloads — 120,969 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@indexeddb-orm/idb-orm
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads120,969
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

31At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of radommaciej
16.4/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginradommaciej
public_repos3
account_age_days3,315
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 36 days ago
12/20Version history — 4 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@indexeddb-orm/idb-orm
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.idb-orm.com
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://www.idb-orm.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

24At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 173 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated11
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive7
scorecard_aggregate1.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: dexie 4.0.0-alpha.1 (high 7.3)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
33.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,617 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages7
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the npm:@indexeddb-orm/idb-orm@0.0.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 7 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — angular-demo-app/tsconfig.json, react-demo-app/tsconfig.json, svelte-demo-app/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, vue-demo-app/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsangular-demo-app/tsconfig.json, react-demo-app/tsconfig.json, svelte-demo-app/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, vue-demo-app/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/118 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes18,752
source_files_sampled118
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

447GitHub stars
1contributors
5commits, last 12 months
36days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

34455532026-062026-062026-06
OpenSSF Scorecard 1.2 / 10
1.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-06 17:54 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities173 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 38
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@angular/animations^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@angular/cdk^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@angular/common^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@angular/compiler^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@angular/core^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@angular/forms^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@angular/material^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser-dynamic^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@angular/router^17.0.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npm@indexeddb-orm/idb-orm^0.0.3angular-demo-app/package.json
npmrxjs~7.8.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npmtslib^2.3.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npmzone.js~0.14.0angular-demo-app/package.json
npmdexie4.0.0-alpha.1package.json
npmdexie-cloud-addon4.0.0-beta.18package.json
npmloglevel^1.9.2package.json
npmzod^4.1.11package.json
npm@emotion/react^11.14.0react-demo-app/package.json
npm@emotion/styled^11.14.1react-demo-app/package.json
npm@mui/icons-material^7.3.2react-demo-app/package.json
npm@mui/material^7.3.2react-demo-app/package.json
npm@indexeddb-orm/idb-orm^0.0.3react-demo-app/package.json
npmdexie-react-hooks^4.2.0react-demo-app/package.json
npmreact^19.1.1react-demo-app/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.1.1react-demo-app/package.json
npmzod^4.1.5react-demo-app/package.json
npm@emotion/react^11.14.0svelte-demo-app/package.json
npm@emotion/styled^11.14.1svelte-demo-app/package.json
npm@mui/icons-material^7.3.2svelte-demo-app/package.json
npm@mui/material^7.3.2svelte-demo-app/package.json
npm@indexeddb-orm/idb-orm^0.0.3svelte-demo-app/package.json
npmzod^3.22.0svelte-demo-app/package.json
npm@mdi/font^7.4.47vue-demo-app/package.json
npm@indexeddb-orm/idb-orm^0.0.3vue-demo-app/package.json
npmvue^3.4.0vue-demo-app/package.json
npmvuetify^3.5.0vue-demo-app/package.json
npmzod^4.1.5vue-demo-app/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 1

Installing npm:@indexeddb-orm/idb-orm@0.0.4 pulls in 7 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
dexie4.0.0-alpha.1directhigh14.0.0-alpha.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.