Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-21 17:49 UTC

rails / mission_control-jobs

Dashboard and Active Job extensions to operate and troubleshoot background jobs

Ruby · HTMLMIT★ 1,053 stars⑂ 139 forkssince Aug 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginNetwork servicehow this is determined

rails/mission_control-jobs holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (74/100) and lowest on Vitality (33/100). It was last updated 242 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ruby on RailsOrganization
2,704 followers129 public repossince Apr 2008

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsmission_control-jobs1.1.0-16405 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

33At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 242 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18Commit volume3 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year3
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push242
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases13 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 405 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~36.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv1.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release405
mean_days_between_releases36.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49/60Stars1,053 stars
17.8/25Forks139 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks139
stars1,053
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
69.9/80Total downloads5,380,065 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmission_control-jobs
dependents
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads5,380,065
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 42% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth53 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled53
top_contributor_share0.418
How it's scored
28.1/42Issue resolution67% of issues closed
23.2/30PR acceptance123/159 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 19/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs123
open_issues44
closed_issues89
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.669
closed_unmerged_prs36
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
24.7/25Owner reach2,704 followers of rails
25/25Track record129 public repos, account ~18 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,704
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginrails
public_repos129
account_age_days6,715
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on rubygems
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 405 days ago
20/20Version history16 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmission_control-jobs
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish405

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
4/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.5/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 19/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities68 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories68
affected_packages16
assessed_packages95
unassessed_packages19
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 7, moderate 5, low 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 95 resolved dependencies against OSV. 19 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
21.4/40Legible commit history39 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.402
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeRuby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/160 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes10,180
source_files_sampled160
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,053GitHub stars
53contributors
3commits, last 12 months
242days since last push
13releases
2bus factor
44open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 139 ⇿
0Stars
139Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515013782024-012025-052026-08
Major 1Minor 6Patch 6

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-21 17:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2CI-Tests6 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 19/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities68 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemscapybaraGemfile
All dependencies 114

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 114 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactioncable7.2.2indirect
RubyGemsactionpack7.2.2indirect
RubyGemsactionview7.2.2indirect
RubyGemsactivejob7.2.2indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel7.2.2indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord7.2.2indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport7.2.2indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.8.6indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.2indirect
RubyGemsbase640.2.0indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbetter_htmlindirect
RubyGemsbetter_html2.1.1indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.4indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsdebugindirect
RubyGemsdebug1.9.1indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.1indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.0indirect
RubyGemset-orbi1.2.11indirect
RubyGemsfugit1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.6indirect
RubyGemsimportmap-railsindirect
RubyGemsimportmap-rails2.0.1indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.7.2indirect
RubyGemsirbindirect
RubyGemsirb1.14.1indirect
RubyGemsjson2.7.1indirect
RubyGemslogger1.6.1indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.23.1indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.2indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.25.1indirect
RubyGemsmochaindirect
RubyGemsmocha2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmono_logger1.1.2indirect
RubyGemsmulti_json1.15.0indirect
RubyGemsmustermann3.0.3indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.4indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.16.7indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.24.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.0.5indirect
RubyGemspropshaftindirect
RubyGemspropshaft1.1.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.1.2indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix5.0.4indirect
RubyGemspumaindirect
RubyGemspuma6.4.3indirect
RubyGemsraabro1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsrack-protection4.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrailties7.2.2indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake13.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrdoc6.7.0indirect
RubyGemsredisindirect
RubyGemsredis5.1.0indirect
RubyGemsredis-client0.21.0indirect
RubyGemsredis-namespaceindirect
RubyGemsredis-namespace1.11.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.5.10indirect
RubyGemsresqueindirect
RubyGemsresque2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsresque-pauseindirect
RubyGemsresque-pause0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.3.9indirect
RubyGemsrubocopindirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.52.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.30.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest0.34.5indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performanceindirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.20.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails2.23.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails-omakaseindirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails-omakase1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.3.2indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.3.1indirect
RubyGemsselenium-webdriverindirect
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.18.1indirect
RubyGemssinatra4.1.0indirect
RubyGemssmart_properties1.17.0indirect
RubyGemssolid_queueindirect
RubyGemssolid_queue1.0.1indirect
RubyGemssqlite3indirect
RubyGemssqlite32.2.0indirect
RubyGemsstimulus-railsindirect
RubyGemsstimulus-rails1.3.3indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsthor1.3.2indirect
RubyGemstilt2.4.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsturbo-railsindirect
RubyGemsturbo-rails2.0.5indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width2.5.0indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.10indirect
RubyGemswebsocket1.2.10indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.7.6indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.7.1indirect
Dependency advisories 16

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 95 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 16 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 19 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rack-session2.0.0indirectcritical22.1.2
activesupport7.2.2indirecthigh38.1.2.1
addressable2.8.6indirecthigh12.9.0
concurrent-ruby1.3.4indirecthigh31.3.7
nokogiri1.16.7indirecthigh151.19.4
puma6.4.3indirecthigh28.0.2
rack3.1.8indirecthigh243.2.6
websocket-driver0.7.6indirecthigh40.8.2
activerecord7.2.2indirectmoderate18.0.2.1
loofah2.23.1indirectmoderate12.25.2
rexml3.3.9indirectmoderate13.4.2
sinatra4.1.0indirectmoderate14.2.0
sqlite32.2.0indirectmoderate22.9.5
actionpack7.2.2indirectlow18.0.0.1
actionview7.2.2indirectlow18.1.2.1
rails-html-sanitizer1.6.0indirectlow61.7.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsRubyGems.