Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 14:24 UTC

raine / workmux

git worktrees + tmux windows for zero-friction parallel dev

Rust · PythonMIT★ 2,374 stars⑂ 317 forkssince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindTerminal interfaceCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

raine/workmux holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Security (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Raine VirtaPersonal account
295 followers266 public repossince May 2008

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.ioworkmux0.1.2556152530 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
30.5/36Commit cadence44/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume2,225 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,225
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year44
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.1.255
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
54.8/60Stars2,374 stars
20.8/25Forks317 forks
9.1/15Watchers44 watchers
Inputs used
forks317
stars2,374
watchers44
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
37.2/80Monthly downloads615 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesworkmux
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads6,691
monthly_downloads615
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 96% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth37 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled37
top_contributor_share0.961
How it's scored
34.7/42Issue resolution83% of issues closed
18.3/30PR acceptance47/77 decided PRs merged
10.1/13Newcomer PR acceptance7/9 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs47
open_issues29
closed_issues138
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d15
issue_closed_ratio0.826
closed_unmerged_prs30
first_time_authors_30d7
first_time_prs_merged_30d7
first_time_prs_decided_30d9
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
17.8/25Owner reach295 followers of raine
25/25Track record266 public repos, account ~18 yr old
Inputs used
followers295
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginraine
public_repos266
account_age_days6,681
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history253 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesworkmux
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

73Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttp://workmux.raine.dev
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttp://workmux.raine.dev
docs_sitehttp://workmux.raine.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities11 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.6

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsdocs/src/content/docs/guide/agents.md, docs/src/content/docs/reference/commands/claude.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://workmux.raine.dev/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history81 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://workmux.raine.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.81
agent_instruction_filesdocs/src/content/docs/guide/agents.md, docs/src/content/docs/reference/commands/claude.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,462
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapjustfile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingdocs/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsdocs/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
53/55Manageable file sizes9/247 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes220,127
source_files_sampled247
oversized_source_files9

Key facts

2,374GitHub stars
37contributors
2,225commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
29open issues
crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index crates:workmux@0.1.255; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 317 ⇿
0Stars
317Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375316402025-112026-042026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 99
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 14:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities11 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 42
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioclap4.6Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap_complete4.6Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yaml0.9Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml_edit0.25Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioglob0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iopathdiff0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3Cargo.toml
crates.iohome0.5Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-appender0.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioedit0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iowhich8.0Cargo.toml
crates.iominijinja2.19Cargo.toml
crates.iotabled0.21Cargo.toml
crates.ioshlex1.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioslug0.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioindicatif0.18Cargo.toml
crates.ioconsole0.16Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1Cargo.toml
crates.iopulldown-cmark0.13Cargo.toml
crates.iotextwrap0.16Cargo.toml
crates.ioratatui0.30Cargo.toml
crates.iocrossterm0.29Cargo.toml
crates.ioansi-to-tui8Cargo.toml
crates.ionotify-rust4Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioctrlc3.5Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22Cargo.toml
crates.ionix0.31.2Cargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3.27Cargo.toml
crates.iogetrandom0.4.2Cargo.toml
crates.iosimilar3Cargo.toml
crates.ioterminal-light1.8Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-width0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iosignal-hook0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ionotify9.0.0-rc.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioignore0.4Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.