Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 00:11 UTC

rancher / terraform-aws-server

A Terraform Module Managing EC2 Instances

HCL · Shell · GoNo license detected★ 2 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗

rancher/terraform-aws-server holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (20/100). It was last updated 11 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

RancherOrganization · verified domain
1,399 followers568 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 11 days ago
9/36Commit cadence13/52 weeks with commits
14.5/18Commit volume40 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year40
human_commit_share0.62
days_since_last_push11
active_weeks_last_year13
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases49 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 53 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~78.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count49
latest_release_tagv2.0.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release53
mean_days_between_releases78.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

20At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
4.7/15Watchers8 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars2
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.993
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
28.7/30PR acceptance159/166 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs159
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
22.6/25Owner reach1,399 followers of rancher
25/25Track record568 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,399
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginrancher
public_repos568
account_age_days4,351

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests25 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaws, aws-ec2, terraform, terraform-module
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests25 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
6.8/7.5Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5Packagingno data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories8
affected_packages4
assessed_packages84
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 84 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history62 of 62 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,705
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstraptest/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentNix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifeststest/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.14
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeHCL without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/10 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHCL
largest_source_bytes8,227
source_files_sampled10
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
2contributors
40commits, last 12 months
11days since last push
49releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
47Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612023-072025-012026-06
Major 2Minor 8Patch 36

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 00:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests25 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 6/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
9Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 84

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.42.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.24indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.29indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/s3/transfermanagerv0.2.9indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.29indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.29indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.30indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/acmv1.39.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/autoscalingv1.67.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/cloudwatchlogsv1.75.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodbv1.59.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ec2v1.305.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ecrv1.58.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ecsv1.82.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iamv1.54.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.12indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.9.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/endpoint-discoveryv1.12.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.29indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.19.29indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/kmsv1.53.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/lambdav1.92.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/rdsv1.119.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/route53v1.63.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.103.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/secretsmanagerv1.42.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.1.5indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/snsv1.40.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/sqsv1.44.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssmv1.69.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.31.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.36.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.43.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.27.2indirect
Gogithub.com/bgentry/go-netrcv0.0.0-20140422174119-9fd32a8b3d3dindirect
Gogithub.com/boombuler/barcodev1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2v2.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errorsv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/go-commonsv0.17.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/terratestv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-getter/v2v2.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-safetempv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-jsonv0.27.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/copierv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.6indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/textv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-zglobv0.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/pquerna/otpv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tmccombs/hcl2jsonv0.6.9indirect
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.15indirect
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.7indirect
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetricsv0.0.0-20250705151800-55b8f293f342indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.18.1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.53.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.46.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.45.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 84 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.6indirectunknown11.18.7
golang.org/x/cryptov0.53.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/textv0.38.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.