Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-04 07:23 UTC

reactiveui / ReactiveUI.Validation

Reactive validation for ReactiveUI view models. Declare validation rules as observables over properties and bind the results to views on any supported .NET platform.

C#MIT★ 273 stars⑂ 29 forkssince Feb 2019View on GitHub ↗

reactiveui/ReactiveUI.Validation holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Security (44/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

ReactiveUIOrganization · verified domain
298 followers26 public repossince Sep 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 153 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year153
human_commit_share0.19
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 32 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~156.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count32
latest_release_tagv8.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases156.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.5/60Stars — 273 stars
12.1/25Forks — 29 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks29
stars273
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
40.8/80Total downloads — 8,530 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX, ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads8,530
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 14 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.453
How it's scored
38.1/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
23.2/30PR acceptance — 723/935 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs723
open_issues5
closed_issues48
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.906
closed_unmerged_prs212
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
17.8/25Owner reach — 298 followers of reactiveui
22.4/25Track record — 26 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers298
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginreactiveui
public_repos26
account_age_days5,135

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 14 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX, ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://reactiveui.net/docs/handbook/user-input-validation
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsreactiveui, validation-library, xamarin-forms, xamarin-android, xamarin-ios, netcore, xamarin, android, hacktoberfest, avalonia, wpf, winforms, reactivex
has_wikino
homepagehttps://reactiveui.net/docs/handbook/user-input-validation
docs_sitehttps://reactiveui.net/docs/handbook/user-input-validation
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier30
security_posture_before_jurisdiction60
High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages20
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 2 resolved dependencies against OSV. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,488
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive.csproj, src/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.csproj, src/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 81 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive.csproj, src/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.csproj, src/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive.csproj, src/ReactiveUI.Validation/ReactiveUI.Validation.csproj, src/samples/AvaloniaApplication1.Desktop/AvaloniaApplication1.Desktop.csproj, src/samples/AvaloniaApplication1/AvaloniaApplication1.csproj, src/samples/LoginApp.Avalonia.Desktop/LoginApp.Avalonia.Desktop.csproj, src/samples/LoginApp.Avalonia/LoginApp.Avalonia.csproj, src/samples/LoginApp.Uwp/LoginApp.Uwp.csproj, src/samples/LoginApp.WinForms/LoginApp.WinForms.csproj, src/samples/LoginApp.Wpf/LoginApp.Wpf.csproj, src/samples/LoginApp/LoginApp.csproj, src/tests/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive.Tests/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive.Tests.csproj, src/tests/ReactiveUI.Validation.Tests/ReactiveUI.Validation.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.81
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/95 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes40,100
source_files_sampled95
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

273GitHub stars
14contributors
153commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
32releases
2bus factor
5open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 29 ⇿
0Stars
29Forks
29Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302912019-042022-122026-08
Major 0Minor 1Patch 28

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-04 07:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 1/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetReactiveUI.AndroidX.Reactive—src/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive.csproj
NuGetXamarin.Google.Android.Material—src/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.Reactive.csproj
NuGetReactiveUI.AndroidX—src/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.csproj
NuGetXamarin.Google.Android.Material—src/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX/ReactiveUI.Validation.AndroidX.csproj
NuGetReactiveUI.Reactive—src/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive.csproj
NuGetDynamicData—src/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable—src/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode—src/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive/ReactiveUI.Validation.Reactive.csproj
NuGetReactiveUI—src/ReactiveUI.Validation/ReactiveUI.Validation.csproj
NuGetDynamicData—src/ReactiveUI.Validation/ReactiveUI.Validation.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable—src/ReactiveUI.Validation/ReactiveUI.Validation.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode—src/ReactiveUI.Validation/ReactiveUI.Validation.csproj
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 14 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetDynamicData—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode—direct
NuGetReactiveUI—direct
NuGetReactiveUI.AndroidX—direct
NuGetReactiveUI.AndroidX.Reactive—direct
NuGetReactiveUI.Reactive—direct
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable—direct
NuGetXamarin.Google.Android.Material—direct
NuGetAvalonia—indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop—indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Diagnostics—indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Fonts.Inter—indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Fluent—indirect
NuGetMahApps.Metro—indirect
NuGetMessageBox.Avalonia—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.UniversalWindowsPlatform6.2.14indirect
NuGetPolyfill—indirect
NuGetReactiveUI.SourceGenerators—indirect
NuGetReactiveUI.Uwp18.4.1indirect
NuGetReactiveUI.Validation—indirect
NuGetReactiveUI.Winforms—indirect
NuGetReactiveUI.WPF—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 2 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.