Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 23:30 UTC

redis / lettuce

Redis Java client

JavaMIT★ 5,781 stars⑂ 1,110 forkssince May 2014View on GitHub ↗

redis/lettuce holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on Security (68/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

RedisOrganization · verified domain
3,031 followers79 public repossince Mar 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenio.lettuce:lettuce-core8.0.0.BETA1-1203 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 544 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year544
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~17.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag6.9.0.RELEASE
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases17.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

95Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 5,781 stars
25/25Forks — 1,110 forks
12.7/15Watchers — 195 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,110
stars5,781
watchers195
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 78% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.78
How it's scored
39.8/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
19.3/30PR acceptance — 628/975 decided PRs merged
8.3/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 7/11 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 11/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs628
open_issues136
closed_issues2,465
prs_merged_7d11
prs_decided_7d15
prs_merged_30d32
prs_decided_30d37
issue_closed_ratio0.948
closed_unmerged_prs347
first_time_authors_30d9
first_time_prs_merged_30d7
first_time_prs_decided_30d11
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 3,031 followers of redis
25/25Track record — 79 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,031
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginredis
public_repos79
account_age_days5,334

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 120 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesio.lettuce:lettuce-core
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 12 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://redis.github.io/lettuce/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjava, redis, asynchronous, reactive, redis-sentinel, redis-cluster, azure-redis-cache, aws-elasticache, redis-client
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://redis.github.io/lettuce/
docs_sitehttps://redis.github.io/lettuce/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
1.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 11/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages14
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the maven:io.lettuce:lettuce-core@8.0.0.BETA1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 14 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
18.7/40Legible commit history — 35 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.35
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9,900
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifestspom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 15/1,820 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes11,821,704
source_files_sampled1,820
oversized_source_files15
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5,781GitHub stars
99contributors
544commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
136open issues
Maven, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 15 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,110 ⇿
0Stars
1,110Forks
97Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

02004006008001,0001,2001,110112016-112021-112026-10
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 23:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 11/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 26 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 39
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenio.netty:netty-bom${netty.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.zipkin.brave:brave-bom${brave.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-bom${micrometer.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracing-bom${micrometer-tracing.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom${junit5.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-bom${log4j2-version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-bom${kotlin.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-bom${kotlinx-coroutines.version}pom.xml
Mavenredis.clients.authentication:redis-authx-core0.2.0pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-common—pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-handler—pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport—pom.xml
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-core${reactor.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-pool2${commons-pool.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib—pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-reactive—pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-jdk8—pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-tcnative2.0.65.Finalpom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-resolver-dns—pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-codec-http—pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind${jackson-version}pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-classes-epoll—pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-classes-kqueue—pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-classes-io_uring—pom.xml
Mavenio.zipkin.brave:brave—pom.xml
Mavenorg.latencyutils:LatencyUtils${latencyutils.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-core—pom.xml
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-observation—pom.xml
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracing—pom.xml
Mavenorg.hdrhistogram:HdrHistogram${hdr-histogram.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.reactivex:rxjava${rxjava.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.reactivex:rxjava-reactive-streams${rxjava-reactive-streams.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.reactivex.rxjava2:rxjava${rxjava2.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.reactivex.rxjava3:rxjava${rxjava3.version}pom.xml
Mavenjavax.enterprise:cdi-api${cdi-api.version}pom.xml
Mavenjavax.inject:javax.inject1pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.2pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-junit-platform3.4.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-junit-platform3.3.1pom.xml
All dependencies 115

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 39 direct and 76 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.17.0direct
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.2direct
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-bom1.14.2direct
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-core—direct
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-observation—direct
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracing—direct
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracing-bom1.2.4direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-bom4.2.17direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-codec-http—direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-common—direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-handler—direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-resolver-dns—direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-tcnative2.0.65direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport—direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-classes-epoll—direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-classes-io_uring—direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-classes-kqueue—direct
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-core3.8.7direct
Mavenio.reactivex.rxjava2:rxjava2.2.21direct
Mavenio.reactivex.rxjava3:rxjava3.1.8direct
Mavenio.reactivex:rxjava1.3.8direct
Mavenio.reactivex:rxjava-reactive-streams1.2.1direct
Mavenio.zipkin.brave:brave—direct
Mavenio.zipkin.brave:brave-bom5.13.11direct
Mavenjavax.enterprise:cdi-api2.0.SP1direct
Mavenjavax.inject:javax.inject1direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-pool22.12.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-bom2.24.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-junit-platform3.3.1direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-junit-platform3.4.0direct
Mavenorg.hdrhistogram:HdrHistogram2.2.2direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-bom2.0.0direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib—direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-bom1.5.2direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-jdk8—direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-reactive—direct
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom5.10.2direct
Mavenorg.latencyutils:LatencyUtils2.0.3direct
Mavenredis.clients.authentication:redis-authx-core0.2.0direct
Mavencom.github.javaparser:javaparser-core3.28.0indirect
Mavencom.tngtech.archunit:archunit-junit51.3.0indirect
Maveneu.rekawek.toxiproxy:toxiproxy-java2.1.11indirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-test—indirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracing-integration-test—indirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-tracing-test—indirect
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-native-epoll4.2.17indirect
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-native-io_uring4.2.17indirect
Mavenio.projectreactor.netty:reactor-netty-http1.2.8indirect
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-test3.8.7indirect
Mavenjavax.annotation:javax.annotation-api1.3.2indirect
Mavenjavax.servlet:javax.servlet-api4.0.1indirect
Mavennet.nicoulaj.maven.plugins:checksum-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavennet.nicoulaj.maven.plugins:checksum-maven-plugin1.11indirect
Mavennet.revelc.code.formatter:formatter-maven-plugin2.16.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.18.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j-impl—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin3.1.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin3.7.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.13.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin3.3.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.2.8indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-install-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.4.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.8.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin3.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin3.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.4.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-se2.0.27indirect
Mavenorg.assertj:assertj-core3.27.7indirect
Mavenorg.awaitility:awaitility—indirect
Mavenorg.awaitility:awaitility4.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin3.5.0indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin3.1.1indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:flatten-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:flatten-maven-plugin1.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.hamcrest:hamcrest-library2.2indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin0.8.12indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-maven-plugin2.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-reflect—indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-test-junit5—indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api—indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine—indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-params—indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core4.9.0indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-junit-jupiter4.9.0indirect
Mavenorg.openjdk.jmh:jmh-core1.21indirect
Mavenorg.openjdk.jmh:jmh-generator-annprocess1.21indirect
Mavenorg.reactivestreams:reactive-streams-tck1.0.4indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:jcl-over-slf4j2.0.16indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.8.0indirect
Mavenorg.testcontainers:junit-jupiter1.20.1indirect
Mavenorg.testcontainers:testcontainers1.20.4indirect
Mavenorg.testng:testng7.5indirect
Mavenpl.project13.maven:git-commit-id-plugin—indirect
Mavenpl.project13.maven:git-commit-id-plugin4.9.10indirect
Mavenredis.clients.authentication:redis-authx-entraid0.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs—indirect
PyPImkdocs-macros-plugin—indirect
PyPImkdocs-material—indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing maven:io.lettuce:lettuce-core@8.0.0.BETA1 pulls in 14 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.