Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-01 09:41 UTC

rendro / easy-pie-chart

easy pie chart is a lightweight plugin to draw simple, animated pie charts for single values

TypeScriptMIT★ 2,061 stars⑂ 485 forkssince Jul 2012View on GitHub ↗

rendro/easy-pie-chart holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (73/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (52/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

RobertPersonal account

371 followers22 public repossince Sep 2010@airbnb

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	easy-pie-chart	3.2.0	85,970	9	9 days ago	pie-chart chart circular-progress percent progress-bar

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

49Weak

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 9 days ago
0.7/36	Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
9.7/18	Commit volume — 11 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	11
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	9
active_weeks_last_year	1

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 7 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~0 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	7
latest_release_tag	v3.2.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	9
mean_days_between_releases	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

87Excellent

How it's scored

53.8/60	Stars — 2,061 stars
22.4/25	Forks — 485 forks
11/15	Watchers — 95 watchers

Inputs used

forks	485
stars	2,061
watchers	95
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

82Excellent

How it's scored

65.8/80	Monthly downloads — 85,970 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	easy-pie-chart
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	85,970
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 71% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 20 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	20
top_contributor_share	0.709

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
13.8/30	PR acceptance — 22/48 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	22
open_issues	0
closed_issues	166
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	26
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

63Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.5/25	Owner reach — 371 followers of rendro
21.9/25	Track record — 22 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	371
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	rendro
public_repos	22
account_age_days	5,783

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20	Version history — 9 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	easy-pie-chart
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — http://rendro.github.io/easy-pie-chart
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	http://rendro.github.io/easy-pie-chart
docs_site	http://rendro.github.io/easy-pie-chart
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 4/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
1/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	159
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 159 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

14Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.4/40	Legible commit history — 27 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.27
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

45Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/16 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	13,354
source_files_sampled	16
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,061GitHub stars

20contributors

11commits, last 12 months

9days since last push

7releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 485 ⇿

0Stars

485Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10

4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-01 09:41 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 4/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	11 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
2	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 159

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 159 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@asamuzakjp/css-color	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/color-helpers	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-calc	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-color-parser	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-parser-algorithms	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-tokenizer	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.4`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	cac	`6.7.14`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	chai	`5.3.3`	indirect
npm	check-error	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	cssstyle	`4.6.0`	indirect
npm	data-urls	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	decimal.js	`10.6.0`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	html-encoding-sniffer	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	is-potential-custom-element-name	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`25.0.1`	indirect
npm	loupe	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	nwsapi	`2.2.24`	indirect
npm	parse5	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	pathval	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.22`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	rrweb-cssom	`0.7.1`	indirect
npm	rrweb-cssom	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	saxes	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`3.10.0`	indirect
npm	strip-literal	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	symbol-tree	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tinypool	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	tinyspy	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	tldts	`6.1.86`	indirect
npm	tldts-core	`6.1.86`	indirect
npm	tough-cookie	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	tr46	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	vite	`7.3.6`	indirect
npm	vite-node	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	vitest	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	w3c-xmlserializer	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-encoding	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`14.2.0`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.21.1`	indirect
npm	xml-name-validator	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	xmlchars	`2.2.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 159 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records