Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 03:19 UTC

rerun-io / quiver

A zero-copy, strongly typed interface for arrow-rs

RustApache-2.0★ 20 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗

rerun-io/quiver holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (50/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

rerun.ioOrganization
789 followers146 public repossince Feb 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioquiver0.6.153,47195 days agoarrowcolumnarderiveschemavalidationdata-structuresencoding
crates.ioquiver_types0.6.153,49885 days agoarrowcolumnarschemavalidationdata-structuresencoding
crates.ioquiver_derive0.6.153,19385 days agoarrowcolumnarderiveschemavalidationdata-structuresencoding

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume142 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year142
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases8 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~12.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tag0.6.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases12.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20.7/60Stars20 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars20
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
69.4/80Monthly downloads160,162 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesquiver, quiver_types, quiver_derive
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads484,385
monthly_downloads160,162
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.979
How it's scored
19.4/42Issue resolution46% of issues closed
28.8/30PR acceptance46/48 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs46
open_issues7
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d26
prs_decided_30d27
issue_closed_ratio0.462
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
20.8/25Owner reach789 followers of rerun-io
22.1/25Track record146 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers789
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginrerun-io
public_repos146
account_age_days1,668

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history9 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesquiver, quiver_types, quiver_derive
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configCargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), clippy.toml, crates/quiver/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/quiver_derive/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/quiver_types/Cargo.toml ([lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/quiver
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsarrow, rust
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/quiver
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages99
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:quiver@0.6.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 99 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history88 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.88
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, crates/quiver/Cargo.toml, crates/quiver_derive/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configCargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), clippy.toml, crates/quiver/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/quiver_derive/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/quiver_types/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice47 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.47
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/quiver/Cargo.toml, crates/quiver_derive/Cargo.toml, crates/quiver_types/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
53.9/55Manageable file sizes1/52 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes79,643
source_files_sampled52
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

20GitHub stars
3contributors
142commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
8releases
1bus factor
7open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 03:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioquiver_typescrates/quiver/Cargo.toml
crates.iodocument-featurescrates/quiver/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquiver_derivecrates/quiver/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2crates/quiver_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquotecrates/quiver_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyncrates/quiver_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrowcrates/quiver_types/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemuckcrates/quiver_types/Cargo.toml
crates.iohalfcrates/quiver_types/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserrorcrates/quiver_types/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 108

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 100 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioarrow58.3.0direct
crates.iobytemuck1.25.2direct
crates.iodocument-features0.2.12direct
crates.iohalf2.7.1direct
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106direct
crates.ioquote1.0.45direct
crates.iosyn2.0.117direct
crates.iothiserror2.0.18direct
crates.ioahash0.8.12indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.5indirect
crates.ioarrow-arith58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-array58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-buffer58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-cast58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-data58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-ord58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-row58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-schema58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-select58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-string58.3.0indirect
crates.ioatoi2.0.0indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iobytemuck_derive1.11.0indirect
crates.iobytes1.11.1indirect
crates.iocc1.2.63indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iochrono0.4.44indirect
crates.ioconst-random0.1.18indirect
crates.ioconst-random-macro0.1.16indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.ioglob0.3.3indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone0.1.65indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone-haiku0.1.2indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.99indirect
crates.iolexical-core1.0.6indirect
crates.iolexical-parse-float1.0.6indirect
crates.iolexical-parse-integer1.0.6indirect
crates.iolexical-util1.0.7indirect
crates.iolexical-write-float1.0.6indirect
crates.iolexical-write-integer1.0.6indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibm0.2.16indirect
crates.iolitrs1.0.0indirect
crates.iolog0.4.32indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.1indirect
crates.ionum-bigint0.4.6indirect
crates.ionum-complex0.4.6indirect
crates.ionum-integer0.1.46indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.3indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.10indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.23indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iotarget-triple1.0.0indirect
crates.iotermcolor1.4.1indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iotiny-keccak2.0.2indirect
crates.iotoml1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotrybuild1.0.116indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.3+wasi-0.2.9indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.122indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.122indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.122indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.122indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.62.2indirect
crates.iowindows-implement0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-interface0.59.3indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-result0.4.1indirect
crates.iowindows-strings0.5.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.3indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.50indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.50indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:quiver@0.6.1 pulls in 99 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.