Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 23:24 UTC

riasvdv / statamic-redirect

Redirect allows you to redirect legacy URLs, so that you don't lose SEO value when rebuilding & restructuring a website.

PHPNo license detected★ 29 stars⑂ 30 forkssince Sep 2020View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryhow this is determined

#statamic #statamic-addon

riasvdv/statamic-redirect holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

RiasPersonal account

391 followers71 public repossince Feb 2013@craftcms

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Packagist	rias/statamic-redirect	4.2.1	12,164	119	12 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 5 days ago
20.8/36	Commit cadence — 30/52 weeks with commits
17.7/18	Commit volume — 92 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	92
human_commit_share	0.51
days_since_last_push	5
active_weeks_last_year	30

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 12 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~17.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	4.2.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	12
mean_days_between_releases	17.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

36Weak

How it's scored

23.5/60	Stars — 29 stars
12.2/25	Forks — 30 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	30
stars	29
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

54Moderate

How it's scored

54.5/80	Monthly downloads — 12,164 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	rias/statamic-redirect
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	362,864
monthly_downloads	12,164
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

32At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 25 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	25
top_contributor_share	0.864

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.5/30	PR acceptance — 165/180 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	165
open_issues	0
closed_issues	150
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	3
prs_decided_30d	3
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	15
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.6/25	Owner reach — 391 followers of riasvdv
25/25	Track record — 71 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	391
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	riasvdv
public_repos	71
account_age_days	4,951

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 12 days ago
20/20	Version history — 119 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	rias/statamic-redirect
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	12

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://statamic.com/addons/rias/redirect
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	statamic, statamic-addon
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://statamic.com/addons/rias/redirect
docs_site	https://statamic.com/addons/rias/redirect
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

50Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	3
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	118
unassessed_packages	9
affected_by_severity	high 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 118 resolved dependencies against OSV. 9 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

37Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://statamic.com/llms.txt)
22/40	Legible commit history — 21 of 51 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://statamic.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.412
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

51Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 49 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.49

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/93 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	19,066
source_files_sampled	93
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

29GitHub stars

25contributors

92commits, last 12 months

5days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 30 ⇿

0Stars

30Forks

94Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 3Minor 28Patch 60

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10

5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 23:23 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
10	Maintained	24 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 6

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	spatie/simple-excel	`^1.0\|^2.0\|^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	statamic/cms	`^v6.10.0`	composer.json
Packagist	doctrine/dbal	`^4.2`	composer.json
npm	axios	`^1.20.0`	package.json
npm	vite-svg-loader	`^5.1.2`	package.json
npm	@statamic/cms	`file:./vendor/statamic/cms/resources/dist-package`	package.json

All dependencies 127

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 121 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@statamic/cms	`0.0.0`	direct
npm	axios	`1.20.0`	direct
npm	vite-svg-loader	`5.1.2`	direct
Packagist	doctrine/dbal	`—`	direct
Packagist	spatie/simple-excel	`—`	direct
Packagist	statamic/cms	`—`	direct
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.28.0`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.28.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.4`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.146.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`6.0.8`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.5.18`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.5.18`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.5.18`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.5.18`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.5.18`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.5.18`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.5.18`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.5.18`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.5.18`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	boolbase	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	commander	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	css-select	`5.2.2`	indirect
npm	css-tree	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	css-tree	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	css-what	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	csso	`5.0.5`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	dom-serializer	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	domelementtype	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	domhandler	`5.0.3`	indirect
npm	domutils	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`10.1.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	laravel-vite-plugin	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.25.9`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.17`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mdn-data	`2.0.28`	indirect
npm	mdn-data	`2.0.30`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.17`	indirect
npm	nth-check	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.26`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	sax	`1.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	sourcemap-codec	`1.4.8`	indirect
npm	svgo	`3.3.5`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	universalify	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.2.2`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-externals	`0.6.2`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-full-reload	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	vue	`3.5.18`	indirect
Packagist	ext-json	`—`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	inertiajs/inertia-laravel	`—`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/testbench	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 118 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 9 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nanoid	`3.3.17`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.6`
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records