Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 03:17 UTC

robinrodricks / FluentFTP

An FTP and FTPS client for .NET & .NET Standard, optimized for speed. Provides extensive FTP commands, File uploads/downloads, SSL/TLS connections, Automatic directory listing parsing, File hashing/checksums, File permissions/CHMOD, FTP proxies, FXP support, UTF-8 support, Async/await support, Powershell support and more. Written entirely in C#.

C#MIT★ 3,396 stars⑂ 682 forkssince Oct 2016View on GitHub ↗

robinrodricks/FluentFTP holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (82/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (42/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Robin RodricksPersonal account
248 followers43 public repossince Feb 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetFluentFTP54.2.1-2152 days agoftpftp-clientftpsftps-clientssltlsunixiisftp-proxy
NuGetFluentFTP.Logging1.0.0-11355 days agologloggerlogginginterfaceconnectormela

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

61Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 126 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year126
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,773 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~276.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tag20.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2,773
mean_days_between_releases276.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
57.3/60Stars — 3,396 stars
23.6/25Forks — 682 forks
10.6/15Watchers — 83 watchers
Inputs used
forks682
stars3,396
watchers83
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges14
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io, www.bestpractices.dev
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Total downloads — 59,651,470 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesFluentFTP, FluentFTP.Logging
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads59,651,470
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 47% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.466
How it's scored
41.1/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 719/785 decided PRs merged
8.7/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs719
open_issues22
closed_issues1,033
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.979
closed_unmerged_prs66
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.2/25Owner reach — 248 followers of robinrodricks
24/25Track record — 43 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers248
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginrobinrodricks
public_repos43
account_age_days4,579
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 215 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesFluentFTP, FluentFTP.Logging
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsftp, ftp-client, ftps, ssl, tls, unix, iis, net-core, net-standard, net-framework, uwp
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
1.2/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Passing
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages17
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 17 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
16.2/40Legible commit history — 30 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.303
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — FluentFTP.BouncyCastle/FluentFTP.BouncyCastle.csproj, FluentFTP.CSharpExamples/CSharpExamples.csproj, FluentFTP.Logging/FluentFTP.Logging.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsFluentFTP.BouncyCastle/FluentFTP.BouncyCastle.csproj, FluentFTP.CSharpExamples/CSharpExamples.csproj, FluentFTP.Logging/FluentFTP.Logging.csproj, FluentFTP.Tests/FluentFTP.Tests.csproj, FluentFTP.Xunit/FluentFTP.Xunit.csproj, FluentFTP/FluentFTP.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/432 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes62,924
source_files_sampled432
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

3,396GitHub stars
99contributors
126commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
4releases
2bus factor
22open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'FluentFTP.BouncyCastle' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 682 ⇿
0Stars
682Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

012525037550062575067392016-102021-092026-08
Major 1Minor 0Patch 3

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 03:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Passing
2Code-ReviewFound 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained6 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetFluentFTP48.0.3FluentFTP.BouncyCastle/FluentFTP.BouncyCastle.csproj
NuGetBouncyCastle.Cryptography2.7.0FluentFTP.BouncyCastle/FluentFTP.BouncyCastle.csproj
NuGetlog4net3.3.0FluentFTP.CSharpExamples/CSharpExamples.csproj
NuGetNLog5.1.2FluentFTP.CSharpExamples/CSharpExamples.csproj
NuGetNLog.Extensions.Logging5.2.2FluentFTP.CSharpExamples/CSharpExamples.csproj
NuGetSerilog2.12.0FluentFTP.CSharpExamples/CSharpExamples.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Logging3.1.0FluentFTP.CSharpExamples/CSharpExamples.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.File5.0.0FluentFTP.CSharpExamples/CSharpExamples.csproj
NuGetFluentFTP43.0.1FluentFTP.Logging/FluentFTP.Logging.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging2.1.0FluentFTP.Logging/FluentFTP.Logging.csproj
NuGetFluentFTP.GnuTLS1.0.24FluentFTP.Tests/FluentFTP.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0FluentFTP.Tests/FluentFTP.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3FluentFTP.Tests/FluentFTP.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.0.2FluentFTP.Tests/FluentFTP.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4FluentFTP.Tests/FluentFTP.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0FluentFTP.Xunit/FluentFTP.Xunit.csproj
NuGetTestcontainers4.5.0FluentFTP.Xunit/FluentFTP.Xunit.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3FluentFTP.Xunit/FluentFTP.Xunit.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.0.2FluentFTP.Xunit/FluentFTP.Xunit.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4FluentFTP.Xunit/FluentFTP.Xunit.csproj
All dependencies 17

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBouncyCastle.Cryptography2.7.0direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4direct
NuGetFluentFTP43.0.1direct
NuGetFluentFTP48.0.3direct
NuGetFluentFtp.GnuTls1.0.24direct
NuGetlog4net3.3.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging2.1.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0direct
NuGetNLog5.1.2direct
NuGetNLog.Extensions.Logging5.2.2direct
NuGetSerilog2.12.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Logging3.1.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.File5.0.0direct
NuGetTestcontainers4.5.0direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.0.2direct
PyPIpyftpdlib1.5.6indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 17 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.