Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 04:46 UTC

roblox-ts / types

TypeScript typings for the Roblox platform. Partially handwritten and partially automatically generated.

TypeScriptMIT★ 43 stars⑂ 83 forkssince Sep 2018View on GitHub ↗

roblox-ts/types holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Security (37/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

roblox-tsOrganization
129 followers33 public repossince Sep 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@rbxts/types1.0.93916,8787311 day agotypesrobloxtypescript

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

57Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence45/52 weeks with commits
17.7/18Commit volume93 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year93
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year45
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.3/60Stars43 stars
16/25Forks83 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks83
stars43
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56.4/80Monthly downloads16,878 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@rbxts/types
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads16,878
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 34% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth66 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled66
top_contributor_share0.342
How it's scored
38.5/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
19/30PR acceptance818/1,289 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs818
open_issues9
closed_issues99
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.917
closed_unmerged_prs471
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
15.2/25Owner reach129 followers of roblox-ts
23.2/25Track record33 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers129
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginroblox-ts
public_repos33
account_age_days2,870
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history731 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@rbxts/types
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/@rbxts/types
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsroblox-ts
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/@rbxts/types
docs_sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/@rbxts/types
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc
11/11Static type checkinginclude/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsinclude/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
53.6/55Manageable file sizes1/38 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes122,449
source_files_sampled38
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

43GitHub stars
66contributors
93commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
0releases
2bus factor
9open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 04:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmdom-serializer^2.0.0package.json
npmdomhandler^5.0.3package.json
npmhtmlparser2^10.0.0package.json
All dependencies 147

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 144 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmdom-serializer2.0.0direct
npmdomhandler5.0.3direct
npmhtmlparser210.0.0direct
npm@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap1.2.6indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.4.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.10.1indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc2.1.4indirect
npm@eslint/js8.57.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.11.14indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema2.0.2indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@pkgr/core0.1.1indirect
npm@rbxts/compiler-types3.0.0-types.0indirect
npm@types/node22.13.10indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys7.18.0indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.2.0indirect
npmacorn8.11.3indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomutils3.2.2indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmentities6.0.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint8.57.0indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier10.1.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-no-autofix2.1.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-prettier5.2.3indirect
npmeslint-plugin-simple-import-sort12.1.1indirect
npmeslint-rule-composer0.3.0indirect
npmeslint-scope7.2.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmespree9.6.1indirect
npmesquery1.5.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.2.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-diff1.2.0indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.8.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache3.0.4indirect
npmflatted3.2.5indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmglob7.1.6indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals13.24.0indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmignore5.3.1indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.4indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimatch9.0.5indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.3indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmprettier3.5.3indirect
npmprettier-linter-helpers1.0.0indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver7.6.2indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsynckit0.9.2indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-api-utils1.3.0indirect
npmts-expose-internals5.6.3indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmtypescript5.7.3indirect
npmundici-types6.20.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.