Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 08:26 UTC

rodri-oliveira-dev / Dapper-FluentMap

Fluent mapping for Dapper, with conventions, immutable object materialization, analyzers, source generators, DI integration, and Dommel support.

C#MIT★ 445 stars⑂ 87 forkssince Apr 2014View on GitHub ↗

rodri-oliveira-dev/Dapper-FluentMap holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (75/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (65/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Rodrigo de OliveiraPersonal account
66 followers39 public repossince Feb 2013Ci&T

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence5/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume209 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year209
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases23 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
5.4/27Release cadencea release every ~415.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv3.0.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases415.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.9/60Stars445 stars
16.1/25Forks87 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks87
stars445
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io, sonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
74.9/80Total downloads16,202,580 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesDapper.FluentMap, Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel, FluentMap.Analyzers, FluentMap.Generators, FluentMap.DependencyInjection
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads16,202,580
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 50% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth11 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.501
How it's scored
40.5/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
21.5/30PR acceptance56/78 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance17/17 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs56
open_issues4
closed_issues108
prs_merged_7d14
prs_decided_7d14
prs_merged_30d17
prs_decided_30d17
issue_closed_ratio0.964
closed_unmerged_prs22
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d17
first_time_prs_decided_30d17
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.1/25Owner reach66 followers of rodri-oliveira-dev
23.7/25Track record39 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers66
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginrodri-oliveira-dev
public_repos39
account_age_days4,970
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable5 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history26 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesDapper.FluentMap, Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel, FluentMap.Analyzers, FluentMap.Generators, FluentMap.DependencyInjection
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdapper, c-sharp, poco-properties, analyzers, dommel, fluent-mapping, micro-orm, source-generator
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
2.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages18
unassessed_packages7
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 18 resolved dependencies against OSV. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history94 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.989
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes13,707
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapbenchmarks/Dapper.FluentMap.Benchmarks/Dapper.FluentMap.Benchmarks.csproj, eng/consumer-smoke/AnalyzerDiagnosticConsumer/AnalyzerDiagnosticConsumer.csproj, eng/consumer-smoke/CoreConsumer/CoreConsumer.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsbenchmarks/Dapper.FluentMap.Benchmarks/Dapper.FluentMap.Benchmarks.csproj, eng/consumer-smoke/AnalyzerDiagnosticConsumer/AnalyzerDiagnosticConsumer.csproj, eng/consumer-smoke/CoreConsumer/CoreConsumer.csproj, eng/consumer-smoke/DIConsumer/DIConsumer.csproj, eng/consumer-smoke/DommelConsumer/DommelConsumer.csproj, eng/consumer-smoke/GeneratorAnalyzerConsumer/GeneratorAnalyzerConsumer.csproj, eng/consumer-smoke/TrimExplicitConsumer/TrimExplicitConsumer.csproj, eng/consumer-smoke/TrimGeneratedConsumer/TrimGeneratedConsumer.csproj, src/Dapper.FluentMap.Analyzers/Dapper.FluentMap.Analyzers.csproj, src/Dapper.FluentMap.DependencyInjection/Dapper.FluentMap.DependencyInjection.csproj, src/Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel/Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel.csproj, src/Dapper.FluentMap.Generators/Dapper.FluentMap.Generators.csproj, src/Dapper.FluentMap/Dapper.FluentMap.csproj, test/Dapper.FluentMap.Analyzers.Tests/Dapper.FluentMap.Analyzers.Tests.csproj, test/Dapper.FluentMap.AotSmoke/Dapper.FluentMap.AotSmoke.csproj, test/Dapper.FluentMap.DependencyInjection.Tests/Dapper.FluentMap.DependencyInjection.Tests.csproj, test/Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel.Tests/Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel.Tests.csproj, test/Dapper.FluentMap.GeneratedRegistration.Tests/Dapper.FluentMap.GeneratedRegistration.Tests.csproj, test/Dapper.FluentMap.Generators.Tests/Dapper.FluentMap.Generators.Tests.csproj, test/Dapper.FluentMap.ProviderCompatibility.Tests/Dapper.FluentMap.ProviderCompatibility.Tests.csproj, test/Dapper.FluentMap.Tests/Dapper.FluentMap.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes1/119 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes104,132
source_files_sampled119
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

445GitHub stars
11contributors
209commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
4open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 87 ⇿
0Stars
87Forks
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801008722014-082020-022025-09
Major 1Minor 5Patch 7

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 08:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
5CI-Tests4 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp5.9.0src/Dapper.FluentMap.Analyzers/Dapper.FluentMap.Analyzers.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers5.9.0src/Dapper.FluentMap.Analyzers/Dapper.FluentMap.Analyzers.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.12src/Dapper.FluentMap.DependencyInjection/Dapper.FluentMap.DependencyInjection.csproj
NuGetDapper$(DapperPackageVersion)src/Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel/Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel.csproj
NuGetDommel$(DommelPackageVersion)src/Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel/Dapper.FluentMap.Dommel.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp5.9.0src/Dapper.FluentMap.Generators/Dapper.FluentMap.Generators.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers5.9.0src/Dapper.FluentMap.Generators/Dapper.FluentMap.Generators.csproj
NuGetDapper$(DapperPackageVersion)src/Dapper.FluentMap/Dapper.FluentMap.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces10.0.12src/Dapper.FluentMap/Dapper.FluentMap.csproj
All dependencies 25

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 19 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetDapperdirect
NuGetDommeldirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces10.0.12direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers5.9.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp5.9.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.12direct
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetDapper.FluentMapindirect
NuGetDapper.FluentMap.Dommelindirect
NuGetFluentMap.Analyzersindirect
NuGetFluentMap.DependencyInjectionindirect
NuGetFluentMap.Generatorsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient7.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite10.0.12indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.Core10.0.12indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.12indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.10.0indirect
NuGetNpgsql10.0.3indirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.bundle_e_sqlite32.1.12indirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.bundle_e_sqlite33.0.5indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0indirect
NuGetxunit.v34.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 18 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.