Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 23:08 UTC

rtk-ai / rtk

CLI proxy that reduces LLM token consumption by 60-90% on common dev commands. Single Rust binary, zero dependencies

RustApache-2.0★ 74,729 stars⑂ 4,698 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#agentic-coding #ai-coding #anthropic #claude-code #cli #command-line-tool #cost-reduction #developer-tools #llm #open-source #productivity #rust #token-optimization

rtk-ai/rtk holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (88/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (59/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

rtk-aiOrganization

686 followers7 public repossince Jan 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
crates.io	rtkpoints to another repo — not scored	0.1.0	2,399	1	403 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
19.4/36	Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,451 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,451
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	28

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~0.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	dev-0.45.0-rc.350
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	0.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

98Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 74,729 stars
25/25	Forks — 4,698 forks
12.7/15	Watchers — 193 watchers

Inputs used

forks	4,698
stars	74,729
watchers	193
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 39% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	97
top_contributor_share	0.389

Issue & PR responsiveness

44Weak

How it's scored

13.5/42	Issue resolution — 32% of issues closed
15.6/30	PR acceptance — 539/1,039 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/8 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	539
open_issues	926
closed_issues	437
prs_merged_7d	3
prs_decided_7d	18
prs_merged_30d	16
prs_decided_30d	51
issue_closed_ratio	0.321
closed_unmerged_prs	500
first_time_authors_30d	8
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	8

Ownership & stewardship

72Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
20.4/25	Owner reach — 686 followers of rtk-ai
7.6/25	Track record — 7 public repos, account ~0 yr old

Inputs used

followers	686
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	rtk-ai
public_repos	7
account_age_days	186

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.rtk-ai.app
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 13 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	agentic-coding, ai-coding, anthropic, claude-code, cli, command-line-tool, cost-reduction, developer-tools, llm, open-source, productivity, rust, token-optimization
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://www.rtk-ai.app
docs_site	https://www.rtk-ai.app
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

64Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

71Good

How it's scored

13/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: quick-xml 0.37.5 (high 7.5), anyhow 1.0.102 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	4
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	201
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 201 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 93 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.93
agent_instruction_files	.github/copilot-instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	7,715

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

76Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — src/filters/mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 7 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8	Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	src/filters/mise.toml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.07
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, tests/fixtures/multi-module-skeleton/child-a/pom.xml, tests/fixtures/multi-module-skeleton/child-b/pom.xml, tests/fixtures/multi-module-skeleton/pom.xml, tests/fixtures/multifail-skeleton/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

96Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
50.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 11/148 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	275,642
source_files_sampled	148
oversized_source_files	11

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example

Inputs used

example_dirs	example
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

74,729GitHub stars

97contributors

1,451commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

100releases

2bus factor

926open issues

crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 29 authors (cap 12)
crates package 'rtk' points at a different repository (https://github.com/reachingforthejack/rtk); excluded from ecosystem scoring
Could not fetch npm package '@rtk-ai/rtk-rewrite' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4,698 ⇿

0Stars

4,698Forks

64Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 0Minor 2Patch 3

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10

6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 23:08 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
6	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6	Vulnerabilities	4 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 20

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	clap	`4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	ignore	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	walkdir	`2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	regex	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	colored	`3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	dirs	`5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rusqlite	`0.31`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	toml	`0.8`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	chrono	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tempfile	`3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	sha2	`0.10`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	ureq	`2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	flate2	`1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	quick-xml	`0.37`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	which	`8`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	automod	`1`	Cargo.toml

All dependencies 201

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 180 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.102`	direct
crates.io	automod	`1.0.16`	direct
crates.io	chrono	`0.4.44`	direct
crates.io	clap	`4.5.60`	direct
crates.io	colored	`3.1.1`	direct
crates.io	dirs	`5.0.1`	direct
crates.io	flate2	`1.1.9`	direct
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.17`	direct
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.2`	direct
crates.io	ignore	`0.4.25`	direct
crates.io	quick-xml	`0.37.5`	direct
crates.io	regex	`1.12.3`	direct
crates.io	rusqlite	`0.31.0`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.149`	direct
crates.io	sha2	`0.10.9`	direct
crates.io	tempfile	`3.26.0`	direct
crates.io	toml	`0.8.23`	direct
crates.io	ureq	`2.12.1`	direct
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	direct
crates.io	which	`8.0.1`	direct
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	ahash	`0.8.12`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	android_system_properties	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`0.6.21`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.13`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`0.2.7`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.10.4`	indirect
crates.io	bstr	`1.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.20.2`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.56`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.5.60`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.5.55`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.21`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.10.7`	indirect
crates.io	dirs-sys	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	displaydoc	`0.2.5`	indirect
crates.io	env_home	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	fallible-iterator	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	fallible-streaming-iterator	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	foldhash	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	form_urlencoded	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	generic-array	`0.14.7`	indirect
crates.io	globset	`0.4.18`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.14.5`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.15.5`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	hashlink	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone	`0.1.65`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone-haiku	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	icu_collections	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	icu_locale_core	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer_data	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties	`2.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties_data	`2.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	icu_provider	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	id-arena	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna_adapter	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.17`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.91`	indirect
crates.io	leb128fmt	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.182`	indirect
crates.io	libredox	`0.1.14`	indirect
crates.io	libsqlite3-sys	`0.28.0`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	litemap	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.29`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.3`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	option-ext	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`2.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	pkg-config	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	potential_utf	`0.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.45`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	redox_users	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.14`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.10`	indirect
crates.io	ring	`0.17.14`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	rustls	`0.23.37`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-pki-types	`1.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-webpki	`0.103.13`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.27`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_spanned	`0.6.9`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.8`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.1`	indirect
crates.io	stable_deref_trait	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	subtle	`2.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.117`	indirect
crates.io	synstructure	`0.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	tinystr	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	toml_datetime	`0.6.11`	indirect
crates.io	toml_edit	`0.22.27`	indirect
crates.io	toml_write	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.19.0`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-xid	`0.2.6`	indirect
crates.io	untrusted	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	url	`2.5.8`	indirect
crates.io	utf8_iter	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	vcpkg	`0.2.15`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.2+wasi-0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	wasip3	`0.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.114`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.114`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.114`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.114`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-encoder	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-metadata	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasmparser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	webpki-roots	`0.26.11`	indirect
crates.io	webpki-roots	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	windows-core	`0.62.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-implement	`0.60.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-interface	`0.59.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-result	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-strings	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.48.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.52.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.59.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`0.7.15`	indirect
crates.io	winsafe	`0.0.19`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-core	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust-macro	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-component	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-parser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	writeable	`0.6.2`	indirect
crates.io	yoke	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	yoke-derive	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.40`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.40`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom-derive	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize	`1.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	zerotrie	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec	`0.11.5`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec-derive	`0.11.2`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.21`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 201 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
quick-xml	`0.37.5`	direct	high	2	`0.41.0`
anyhow	`1.0.102`	direct	unknown	1	`1.0.103`
crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.9.20`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records