Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 00:49 UTC

rtxIII / decidra

PythonMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryTerminal interfacehow this is determined

rtxIII/decidra holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (73/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (27/100). It was last updated 50 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

rtxIIIOrganization
0 followers3 public repossince Feb 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdecidra1.1.0136457 days agotradingstockfutuapifinanceanalysistextualterminal

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

55Moderate
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 50 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 110 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year110
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push50
active_weeks_last_year13

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 2 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 55 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv1.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release55
mean_days_between_releases2.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

27At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

36Weak
How it's scored
28.5/80Monthly downloads — 136 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdecidra
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads136
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

31At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

38Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of rtxIII
7.5/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginrtxIII
public_repos3
account_age_days574

Package maintenance

92Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 57 days ago
12/20Version history — 4 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdecidra
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish57

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://decidra.readthedocs.io/
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://decidra.readthedocs.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

72Good
How it's scored
12.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: click 8.1.7 (high 7.2), openharness-ai 0.1.9 (moderate 6.5)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
33.9/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 132 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages2
assessed_packages128
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages2
Matched the pypi:decidra@1.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 128 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 80 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.8
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

62Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — decidra/py.typed
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdecidra/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

80Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (decidra/py.typed)
52.5/55Manageable file sizes — 7/151 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes138,071
source_files_sampled151
oversized_source_files7

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
110commits, last 12 months
50days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'decidra' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for decidra carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 00:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 40
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIsetuptools—pyproject.toml
PyPIwheel—pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy==1.26.4pyproject.toml
PyPIsix—pyproject.toml
PyPIbackports.functools_lru_cache—pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas==1.5.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml—pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests—pyproject.toml
PyPIcached-property—pyproject.toml
PyPItqdm—pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil—pyproject.toml
PyPIpytz—pyproject.toml
PyPIidna—pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi—pyproject.toml
PyPIsoupsieve—pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsocket-client—pyproject.toml
PyPIcharset_normalizer—pyproject.toml
PyPItushare—pyproject.toml
PyPIakshare—pyproject.toml
PyPItdxpy—pyproject.toml
PyPIyfinance==0.2.64pyproject.toml
PyPIfutu_api==9.3.5308pyproject.toml
PyPIfuncat3==1.1.8pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonlite—pyproject.toml
PyPIcandlestick-chart==3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil—pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml—pyproject.toml
PyPIpyarrow—pyproject.toml
PyPIscikit-learn==1.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIclick==8.1.7pyproject.toml
PyPIrich==13.9.4pyproject.toml
PyPIrich_interactive==0.6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorama—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenharness-ai==0.1.9pyproject.toml
PyPItextual—pyproject.toml
PyPItextual-window==0.5.2pyproject.toml
PyPItextual-autocomplete==4.0.4pyproject.toml
PyPItextual-slidecontainer—pyproject.toml
PyPItextual-plotext==1.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIclaude-code-sdk—pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 2

Installing pypi:decidra@1.1.0 pulls in 128 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
click8.1.7directhigh18.3.3
openharness-ai0.1.9directmoderate2—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with rtxIII/decidra. Read them side by side →

94akfamily/akshareAKShare is an elegant and simple financial data interface library for Python, built for human beings! 开源财经数据接口库Exceptional99nautechsystems/nautilus_traderProduction-grade Rust-native trading engine with deterministic event-driven architectureExceptional96ccxt/ccxtA unified trading API with more than 100 crypto exchanges and prediction markets in JavaScript / TypeScript / Python / C# / PHP / Go / Java / RustExceptional96alpacahq/alpaca-pyThe Official Python SDK for Alpaca APIExceptional94HKUDS/Vibe-Trading"Vibe-Trading: Your Personal Trading Agent"Exceptional94catalyst-cooperative/pudlThe Public Utility Data Liberation Project provides analysis-ready energy system data to climate advocates, researchers, policymakers, and journalists.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.