Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 03:09 UTC

ruby-ui / ruby_ui

Ruby gem for RubyUI Components

Ruby · JavaScriptNo license detected★ 1,035 stars⑂ 69 forkssince Nov 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ruby-ui/ruby_ui holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (62/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ruby UIOrganization
74 followers5 public repossince Nov 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmruby_ui_jspoints to another repo — not scored1.0.0-alpha.4121726 days agorbuistimulusstimulusjsstimuluscontrollersrubyrailsrubyonrails
RubyGemsruby_uipoints to another repo — not scored1.6.0-1174 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 181 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year181
human_commit_share0.33
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 7 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 74 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~82 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv1.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release74
mean_days_between_releases82
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
48.9/60Stars — 1,035 stars
15.3/25Forks — 69 forks
6.4/15Watchers — 15 watchers
Inputs used
forks69
stars1,035
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 20% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 33 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled33
top_contributor_share0.205
How it's scored
35.5/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance — 379/447 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs379
open_issues14
closed_issues77
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.846
closed_unmerged_prs68
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.5/25Owner reach — 74 followers of ruby-ui
11.6/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers74
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginruby-ui
public_repos5
account_age_days1,076

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://rubyui.com
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://rubyui.com
docs_sitehttps://rubyui.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages21
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:ruby_ui_js@1.0.0-alpha.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 21 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md, docs/AGENTS.md, docs/CLAUDE.md, gem/AGENTS.md, gem/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 33 of 33 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, docs/AGENTS.md, docs/CLAUDE.md, gem/AGENTS.md, gem/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,972
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 67 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.1
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.67
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/692 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes55,441
source_files_sampled692
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,035GitHub stars
33contributors
181commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
7releases
3bus factor
14open issues
npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • npm package 'ruby_ui_js' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rbui-hq/rbui); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • rubygems package 'ruby_ui' points at a different repository (https://rubygems.org/gems/ruby_ui); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch rubygems package 'ruby_ui-mcp' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 69 ⇿
0Stars
69Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756942023-122025-052026-10
Major 1Minor 6Patch 0

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 03:09 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@floating-ui/dom^1.6.8gem/package.json
npm@hotwired/stimulus^3.2.2gem/package.json
npmchart.js^4.4.1gem/package.json
npmdate-fns^2.30.0gem/package.json
npmembla-carousel8.5.2gem/package.json
npmfuse.js^7.0.0gem/package.json
npmmaska^3.0.3gem/package.json
npmmotion^10.16.4gem/package.json
npmmustache^4.2.0gem/package.json
All dependencies 221

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 206 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@floating-ui/dom1.6.8direct
npm@floating-ui/dom1.8.0direct
npm@hotwired/stimulus3.2.2direct
npmchart.js4.4.3direct
npmchart.js4.5.1direct
npmdate-fns2.30.0direct
npmembla-carousel8.5.2direct
npmembla-carousel8.6.0direct
npmfuse.js7.0.0direct
npmfuse.js7.5.0direct
npmmaska3.0.3direct
npmmaska3.2.2direct
npmmotion10.18.0direct
npmmotion14.2.0direct
npmmustache4.2.0direct
npm@babel/runtime7.29.7indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.2indirect
npm@floating-ui/core1.6.5indirect
npm@floating-ui/core1.8.0indirect
npm@floating-ui/utils0.2.12indirect
npm@floating-ui/utils0.2.5indirect
npm@hotwired/turbo8.0.23indirect
npm@hotwired/turbo-rails8.0.23indirect
npm@kurkle/color0.3.2indirect
npm@kurkle/color0.3.4indirect
npm@motionone/animation10.18.0indirect
npm@motionone/dom10.18.0indirect
npm@motionone/easing10.18.0indirect
npm@motionone/generators10.18.0indirect
npm@motionone/types10.17.1indirect
npm@motionone/utils10.18.0indirect
npm@rails/actioncable8.1.200indirect
npm@tailwindcss/forms0.5.11indirect
npm@tailwindcss/typography0.5.20indirect
npmautoprefixer10.6.1indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.11.25indirect
npmbrowserslist4.29.0indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001810indirect
npmclass-variance-authority0.7.1indirect
npmclsx2.1.1indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.433indirect
npmesbuild0.28.2indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmfraction.js5.3.4indirect
npmframer-motion14.2.0indirect
npmglobals15.9.0indirect
npmhey-listen1.0.8indirect
npmmini-svg-data-uri1.4.4indirect
npmmotion-dom14.2.0indirect
npmmotion-utils14.1.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.20indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.56indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.3indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.0.10indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.2indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.3indirect
npmtslib2.6.3indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtw-animate-css1.4.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.3.3indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsaction_text-trix2.1.19indirect
RubyGemsactioncable8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.3indirect
RubyGemsbindex0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsbootsnap1.26.0indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemscapybara3.40.0indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.7indirect
RubyGemscssbundling-rails1.4.3indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.7indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.4.0indirect
RubyGemshana1.3.7indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.9.4indirect
RubyGemsirb1.18.0indirect
RubyGemsjsbundling-rails1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsjson3.0.2indirect
RubyGemsjson_schemer2.5.0indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.25.2indirect
RubyGemslucide-rails0.7.4indirect
RubyGemsmail2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.2indirect
RubyGemsmcp—indirect
RubyGemsmcp1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitest—indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmsgpack1.8.5indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.7indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.2indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.28.0indirect
RubyGemsparallel2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.12.0indirect
RubyGemsphlex—indirect
RubyGemsphlex2.4.1indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspropshaft1.3.2indirect
RubyGemspry0.16.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemspuma8.0.2indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.7indirect
RubyGemsrack-attack—indirect
RubyGemsrack-attack6.8.0indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrails—indirect
RubyGemsrails8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.1.4indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake—indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrdoc8.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrefract1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.13.1indirect
RubyGemsreline0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsreverse_markdown—indirect
RubyGemsreverse_markdown3.0.2indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrouge—indirect
RubyGemsrouge5.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrss0.3.3indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.91.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip3.7.0indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.51.0indirect
RubyGemssimpleidn0.3.0indirect
RubyGemssin_lru_redux2.5.3indirect
RubyGemssqlite32.10.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard—indirect
RubyGemsstandard1.57.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-custom1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsstandard-performance1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsstimulus-rails1.3.4indirect
RubyGemsstrscan3.1.8indirect
RubyGemstailwind_merge—indirect
RubyGemstailwind_merge1.5.6indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsturbo-rails2.0.23indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.3.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemsweb-console4.3.0indirect
RubyGemswebsocket1.2.11indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.7.5indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:ruby_ui_js@1.0.0-alpha.4 pulls in 21 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, RubyGems.