Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 03:42 UTC

ruby / rbs

The type signature language for Ruby

Ruby · CCustom license★ 2,181 stars⑂ 256 forkssince Mar 2019View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ruby/rbs holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (64/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

The Ruby Programming LanguageOrganization · verified domain

2,103 followers191 public repossince Feb 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
RubyGems	rbs	4.2.0	-	178	24 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
36/36	Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,036 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,036
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	52

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 92 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 24 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~7.6 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	92
latest_release_tag	v4.2.1.pre.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	24
mean_days_between_releases	7.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

84Excellent

How it's scored

54.2/60	Stars — 2,181 stars
20.1/25	Forks — 256 forks
9.8/15	Watchers — 59 watchers

Inputs used

forks	256
stars	2,181
watchers	59
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

64Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Total downloads — 81,985,939 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	rbs
dependents	—
ecosystems	rubygems
total_downloads	81,985,939
monthly_downloads	—
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 88 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	98
top_contributor_share	0.574

Issue & PR responsiveness

75Good

How it's scored

24.3/42	Issue resolution — 58% of issues closed
26.9/30	PR acceptance — 2,447/2,724 decided PRs merged
10.5/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 21/26 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

merged_prs	2,447
open_issues	139
closed_issues	190
prs_merged_7d	5
prs_decided_7d	5
prs_merged_30d	40
prs_decided_30d	46
issue_closed_ratio	0.578
closed_unmerged_prs	277
first_time_authors_30d	2
first_time_prs_merged_30d	21
first_time_prs_decided_30d	26

Ownership & stewardship

99Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
23.9/25	Owner reach — 2,103 followers of ruby
25/25	Track record — 191 public repos, account ~16 yr old

Inputs used

followers	2,103
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	ruby
public_repos	191
account_age_days	6,050

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 24 days ago
20/20	Version history — 178 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	rbs
ecosystems	rubygems
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	24

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 13 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

85Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ruby, type-checking
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

70Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 12/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 88 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

64Moderate

How it's scored

14/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: activesupport 7.2.3 (high 7.5)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 180 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	3
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	142
unassessed_packages	11
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 142 resolved dependencies against OSV. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

29At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
29.4/40	Legible commit history — 54 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.551
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — rust/Cargo.toml, rust/ruby-rbs-sys/Cargo.toml, rust/ruby-rbs/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 22 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8	Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.22
toolchain_manifests	rust/Cargo.toml, rust/ruby-rbs-sys/Cargo.toml, rust/ruby-rbs/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
53.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 9/437 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Ruby
largest_source_bytes	243,415
source_files_sampled	437
oversized_source_files	9

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,181GitHub stars

98contributors

1,036commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

92releases

1bus factor

139open issues

crates.io, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 256 ⇿

0Stars

256Forks

92Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 15Patch 38

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10

7.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 03:41 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9	Code-Review	Found 12/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10	Contributors	project has 88 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
9	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 37

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
RubyGems	rake	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rake-compiler	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	test-unit	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rspec	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rubocop	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rubocop-rubycw	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rubocop-on-rbs	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	json	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	json-schema	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	goodcheck	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	digest	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	tempfile	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rdoc	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	fileutils	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	raap	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	activesupport	`~> 7.0`	Gemfile
RubyGems	extconf_compile_commands_json	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	irb	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	abbrev	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	base64	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	bigdecimal	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	dbm	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	mutex_m	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	nkf	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	stackprof	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	memory_profiler	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	benchmark-ips	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rbs-amber	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	net-smtp	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	csv	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	ostruct	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	pstore	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	timeout	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rbs	`—`	steep/Gemfile
RubyGems	steep	`—`	steep/Gemfile
RubyGems	ruby-lsp	`—`	steep/Gemfile
RubyGems	test-unit	`—`	steep/Gemfile

All dependencies 153

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 35 direct and 118 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
RubyGems	abbrev	`0.1.2`	direct
RubyGems	activesupport	`7.2.3`	direct
RubyGems	base64	`0.3.0`	direct
RubyGems	benchmark-ips	`2.15.1`	direct
RubyGems	bigdecimal	`4.1.2`	direct
RubyGems	csv	`3.3.6`	direct
RubyGems	dbm	`1.1.0`	direct
RubyGems	digest	`3.2.1`	direct
RubyGems	extconf_compile_commands_json	`0.0.7`	direct
RubyGems	fileutils	`1.8.0`	direct
RubyGems	goodcheck	`3.1.0`	direct
RubyGems	irb	`1.18.0`	direct
RubyGems	json	`2.21.2`	direct
RubyGems	json-schema	`6.2.0`	direct
RubyGems	memory_profiler	`1.1.0`	direct
RubyGems	mutex_m	`0.3.0`	direct
RubyGems	net-smtp	`0.5.1`	direct
RubyGems	nkf	`0.3.0`	direct
RubyGems	ostruct	`0.6.3`	direct
RubyGems	pstore	`0.2.1`	direct
RubyGems	raap	`2.0.0`	direct
RubyGems	rake	`13.4.2`	direct
RubyGems	rake-compiler	`1.3.1`	direct
RubyGems	rbs	`4.2.0`	direct
RubyGems	rdoc	`8.0.0`	direct
RubyGems	rspec	`3.13.2`	direct
RubyGems	rubocop	`1.90.0`	direct
RubyGems	rubocop-on-rbs	`2.0.0`	direct
RubyGems	rubocop-rubycw	`0.2.2`	direct
RubyGems	ruby-lsp	`0.26.11`	direct
RubyGems	stackprof	`0.2.28`	direct
RubyGems	steep	`2.1.0`	direct
RubyGems	tempfile	`0.3.1`	direct
RubyGems	test-unit	`3.7.8`	direct
RubyGems	timeout	`0.6.1`	direct
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	bindgen	`—`	indirect
crates.io	bindgen	`0.72.0`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`—`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.29`	indirect
crates.io	cexpr	`0.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	clang-sys	`1.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	glob	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.1`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.189`	indirect
crates.io	libloading	`0.8.8`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.27`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.5`	indirect
crates.io	minimal-lexical	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	nom	`7.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.2.35`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.95`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.40`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.9`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.5`	indirect
crates.io	ruby-rbs-sys	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-hash	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.23`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_yaml	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde_yaml	`0.9.34+deprecated`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.104`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`3.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`3.27.0`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	unsafe-libyaml	`0.2.11`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.53.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	xxhash-rust	`—`	indirect
crates.io	xxhash-rust	`0.8.15`	indirect
RubyGems	addressable	`2.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	ast	`2.4.3`	indirect
RubyGems	benchmark	`0.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	concurrent-ruby	`1.3.8`	indirect
RubyGems	connection_pool	`3.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	diff-lcs	`1.6.2`	indirect
RubyGems	drb	`2.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	erb	`6.0.7`	indirect
RubyGems	ffi	`1.17.4`	indirect
RubyGems	i18n	`1.15.2`	indirect
RubyGems	io-console	`0.9.2`	indirect
RubyGems	jar-dependencies	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	language_server-protocol	`3.17.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	lint_roller	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	listen	`3.10.0`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`1.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	marcel	`1.2.1`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest	`6.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest-mock	`5.27.0`	indirect
RubyGems	net-protocol	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	parallel	`2.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	parser	`3.3.12.0`	indirect
RubyGems	power_assert	`3.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	pp	`0.6.4`	indirect
RubyGems	prettyprint	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	prism	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	prism	`1.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	psych	`4.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	public_suffix	`7.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	racc	`1.8.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rainbow	`3.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rb-fsevent	`0.11.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rb-inotify	`0.11.1`	indirect
RubyGems	regexp_parser	`2.12.0`	indirect
RubyGems	reline	`0.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-core	`3.13.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-expectations	`3.13.5`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-mocks	`3.13.8`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-support	`3.13.7`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-ast	`1.50.0`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby-progressbar	`1.13.0`	indirect
RubyGems	securerandom	`0.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	stringio	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	strong_json	`2.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	strscan	`3.1.8`	indirect
RubyGems	terminal-table	`4.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	tsort	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	tsort	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	tzinfo	`2.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	unicode-display_width	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	unicode-emoji	`4.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	uri	`1.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	zlib	`3.2.3`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 142 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
activesupport	`7.2.3`	direct	high	3	`8.1.2.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records