Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 17:29 UTC

runixer / laplaced

A lightweight, self-hosted Personal AI Daemon written in Go. Features Hybrid RAG (SQLite + Vectors), Long-term Memory, and Voice I/O. Optimized for low-end VPS and Raspberry Pi.

GoMIT★ 6 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceChat botCommand-line toolhow this is determined

runixer/laplaced holds a health index of 12 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (84/100) and lowest on Security (30/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

12
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

12
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

ConstantinePersonal account
7 followers4 public repossince Jul 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/runixer/laplacedv0.11.0-4225 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 401 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year401
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year20
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 25 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~13.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count41
latest_release_tagv0.11.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release25
mean_days_between_releases13.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars — 6 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars6
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, goreportcard.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

44Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
18.2/30PR acceptance — 20/33 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs20
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.5/25Owner reach — 7 followers of runixer
17.1/25Track record — 4 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginrunixer
public_repos4
account_age_days6,277
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 25 days ago
20/20Version history — 42 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/runixer/laplaced
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish25

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-assistant, chatbot, gemini, golang, llm, rag, self-hosted, telegram-bot
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

30At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.4
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier20
security_posture_after_multiplier13
security_posture_before_jurisdiction64
High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages1
assessed_packages84
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 84 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.1/40Legible commit history — 66 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.695
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes34,056
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 3/521 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes73,412
source_files_sampled521
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

6GitHub stars
1contributors
401commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
41releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-21: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 6 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 5 ★ / 0 ⇿
5Stars
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-21. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

12345512026-012026-042026-07
Major 0Minor 5Patch 9
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 17:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 26
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.43.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.35go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.107.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/vault/apiv1.23.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/vault/api/auth/approlev0.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/vault/api/auth/kubernetesv0.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ilyakaznacheev/cleanenvv1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.24.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.8.5go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpcv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttracev1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.45.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.45.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.56.0go.mod
All dependencies 84

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 58 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.43.5direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.35direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.107.1direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/vault/apiv1.23.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/vault/api/auth/approlev0.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/vault/api/auth/kubernetesv0.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/ilyakaznacheev/cleanenvv1.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.24.1direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.8.5direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.45.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpcv1.45.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttracev1.45.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.45.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.45.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.56.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.17indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.36indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.36indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.37indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.16indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.9.29indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.36indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.19.37indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.27.7indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perksv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4v4.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5v5.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2v2.29.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttpv0.7.8indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-rootcertsv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-secure-stdlib/parseutilv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-secure-stdlib/strutilv0.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-sockaddrv1.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hclv1.0.1-vault-7indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/kylelemons/godebugv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/go-strftimev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.70.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.21.1indirect
Gogithub.com/remyoudompheng/bigfftv0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daecindirect
Gogithub.com/ryanuber/go-globv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/objxv0.5.3indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.45.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.45.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpv1.11.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.12.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260803160001-6ac0973c030dindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260803160001-6ac0973c030dindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gomodernc.org/libcv1.74.4indirect
Gomodernc.org/mathutilv1.7.1indirect
Gomodernc.org/memoryv1.11.0indirect
Goolympos.io/encoding/ednv0.0.0-20201019073823-d3554ca0b0a3indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 84 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.83.0indirecthigh31.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.