Software health reportschema 0.23.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 20:14 UTC

runixer / laplaced

A lightweight, self-hosted Personal AI Daemon written in Go. Features Hybrid RAG (SQLite + Vectors), Long-term Memory, and Voice I/O. Optimized for low-end VPS and Raspberry Pi.

GoMIT★ 5 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork serviceChat botCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#ai-assistant #chatbot #gemini #golang #llm #rag #self-hosted #telegram-bot

runixer/laplaced holds a health index of 12 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (85/100) and lowest on Security (30/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

ConstantinePersonal account

8 followers4 public repossince Jul 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/runixer/laplaced	v0.10.3	-	41	11 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 5 days ago
12.5/36	Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 369 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	369
human_commit_share	0.96
days_since_last_push	5
active_weeks_last_year	18

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 40 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 11 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~8.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	40
latest_release_tag	v0.10.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	11
mean_days_between_releases	8.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

10Critical

How it's scored

9.8/60	Stars — 5 stars
0/25	Forks — 0 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	0
stars	5
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	below_threshold

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	1
top_contributor_share	1

Issue & PR responsiveness

52Moderate

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
23.5/30	PR acceptance — 18/23 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	18
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	5
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

42Weak

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.9/25	Owner reach — 8 followers of runixer
17.1/25	Track record — 4 public repos, account ~17 yr old

Inputs used

followers	8
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	runixer
public_repos	4
account_age_days	6,224

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20	Version history — 41 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/runixer/laplaced
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 8 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ai-assistant, chatbot, gemini, golang, llm, rag, self-hosted, telegram-bot
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

30At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

12Critical

Jurisdiction risk alert

High-risk jurisdiction exposure detected

1 software.redFlag.role.ownerRussia1 top contributor profilesRussia

Based on self-published public profile locations. This governance signal does not determine nationality, citizenship, intent, sanctions status, or individual trustworthiness.

How jurisdiction exposure is assessed

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.1
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap	34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier	20
security_posture_after_multiplier	12
security_posture_before_jurisdiction	61

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	87
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 87 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 85 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.885
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	33,120

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.04

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/420 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	62,897
source_files_sampled	420
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

5GitHub stars

1contributors

369commits, last 12 months

5days since last push

40releases

1bus factor

0open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 5 ★ / 0 ⇿

5Stars

14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 5Patch 9

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10

6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 20:14 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 25

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2	`v1.42.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentials	`v1.19.28`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3	`v1.105.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gorilla/websocket	`v1.5.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/vault/api	`v1.23.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/vault/api/auth/approle	`v0.12.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/vault/api/auth/kubernetes	`v0.12.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/ilyakaznacheev/cleanenv	`v1.5.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jackc/pgx/v5	`v5.10.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/joho/godotenv	`v1.5.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_golang	`v1.23.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.8.2`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod
Go	modernc.org/sqlite	`v1.53.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 62 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2	`v1.42.1`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentials	`v1.19.28`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3	`v1.105.0`	direct
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gorilla/websocket	`v1.5.3`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/vault/api	`v1.23.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/vault/api/auth/approle	`v0.12.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/vault/api/auth/kubernetes	`v0.12.0`	direct
Go	github.com/ilyakaznacheev/cleanenv	`v1.5.0`	direct
Go	github.com/jackc/pgx/v5	`v5.10.0`	direct
Go	github.com/joho/godotenv	`v1.5.1`	direct
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_golang	`v1.23.2`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	direct
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.8.2`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	modernc.org/sqlite	`v1.53.0`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstream	`v1.7.14`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsources	`v1.4.30`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2	`v2.7.30`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4a	`v1.4.31`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encoding	`v1.13.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksum	`v1.9.23`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-url	`v1.13.30`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3shared	`v1.19.31`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/smithy-go	`v1.27.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/beorn7/perks	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/burntsushi/toml	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4	`v4.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5	`v5.0.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4	`v4.1.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`v1.4.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/stdr	`v1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2	`v2.29.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/errwrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp	`v0.5.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp	`v0.7.8`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-rootcerts	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-secure-stdlib/parseutil	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-secure-stdlib/strutil	`v0.1.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-sockaddr	`v1.0.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/hcl	`v1.0.1-vault-7`	indirect
Go	github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/pgpassfile	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/pgservicefile	`v0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761`	indirect
Go	github.com/jackc/puddle/v2	`v2.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/kylelemons/godebug	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/munnerz/goautoneg	`v0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822`	indirect
Go	github.com/ncruces/go-strftime	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_model	`v0.6.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/common	`v0.67.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/procfs	`v0.19.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft	`v0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daec`	indirect
Go	github.com/ryanuber/go-glob	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.10`	indirect
Go	github.com/stretchr/objx	`v0.5.3`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdk	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace	`v1.44.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric	`v1.44.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlp	`v1.10.0`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v2	`v2.4.3`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/time	`v0.12.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api	`v0.0.0-20260526163538-3dc84a4a5aaa`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc	`v0.0.0-20260526163538-3dc84a4a5aaa`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.81.1`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/libc	`v1.73.4`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/mathutil	`v1.7.1`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/memory	`v1.11.0`	indirect
Go	olympos.io/encoding/edn	`v0.0.0-20201019073823-d3554ca0b0a3`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 87 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.23.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records