Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-29 22:45 UTC

rupor-github / fb2cng

Unified converter of FB2 files to EPUB2/3, KEPUB, AZW8/KFX, PDF, TXT/MD formats. (Next generation of fb2convert, fb2mobi)

GoGPL-3.0★ 78 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Oct 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationhow this is determined

rupor-github/fb2cng holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Security (34/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ruporPersonal account
25 followers23 public repossince Sep 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence — 36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 701 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year701
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year36
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 67 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~11.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count67
latest_release_tagv1.7.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases11.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30.6/60Stars — 78 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars78
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.2/25Owner reach — 25 followers of rupor-github
22.1/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers25
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginrupor-github
public_repos23
account_age_days4,774
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8, .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml, biome.json
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 17 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsazw, converter, ebooks, eink-devices, epub, epub3, fb2, kepub, kfx, kobo, azw8, kindle, pdf, markdown, md, text, txt
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — vendor/github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/AGENTS.md, vendor/github.com/aws/smithy-go/AGENTS.md, vendor/github.com/clipperhouse/displaywidth/AGENTS.md, vendor/github.com/go-playground/universal-translator/CLAUDE.md, vendor/github.com/go-playground/validator/v10/CLAUDE.md, vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/AGENTS.md, vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/CLAUDE.md, vendor/modernc.org/libc/CLAUDE.md, vendor/modernc.org/libc/GEMINI.md, vendor/modernc.org/memory/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history — 50 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_filesvendor/github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/AGENTS.md, vendor/github.com/aws/smithy-go/AGENTS.md, vendor/github.com/clipperhouse/displaywidth/AGENTS.md, vendor/github.com/go-playground/universal-translator/CLAUDE.md, vendor/github.com/go-playground/validator/v10/CLAUDE.md, vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/AGENTS.md, vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/CLAUDE.md, vendor/modernc.org/libc/CLAUDE.md, vendor/modernc.org/libc/GEMINI.md, vendor/modernc.org/memory/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9,583
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yaml, vendor/charm.land/bubbletea/v2/Taskfile.yaml, vendor/charm.land/lipgloss/v2/Taskfile.yaml, vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/Masterminds/sprig/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/abice/go-enum/Makefile, vendor/github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/Justfile, vendor/github.com/aws/smithy-go/Makefile, vendor/github.com/chainguard-dev/git-urls/Makefile, vendor/github.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/felixge/httpsnoop/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-playground/universal-translator/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-playground/validator/v10/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/go-task/task/v3/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/go-task/task/v3/mise.toml, vendor/github.com/leodido/go-urn/makefile, vendor/github.com/neurosnap/sentences/Makefile, vendor/github.com/rupor-github/gencfg/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/spf13/cast/Makefile, vendor/github.com/stretchr/objx/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/v2/Makefile, vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/zeebo/xxh3/Makefile, vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/multierr/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/zap/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile, vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8, .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml, biome.json
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesTaskfile.yaml, vendor/charm.land/bubbletea/v2/Taskfile.yaml, vendor/charm.land/lipgloss/v2/Taskfile.yaml, vendor/github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/Masterminds/sprig/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/abice/go-enum/Makefile, vendor/github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/Justfile, vendor/github.com/aws/smithy-go/Makefile, vendor/github.com/chainguard-dev/git-urls/Makefile, vendor/github.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/felixge/httpsnoop/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-playground/universal-translator/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-playground/validator/v10/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/go-task/task/v3/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/go-task/task/v3/mise.toml, vendor/github.com/leodido/go-urn/makefile, vendor/github.com/neurosnap/sentences/Makefile, vendor/github.com/rupor-github/gencfg/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/spf13/cast/Makefile, vendor/github.com/stretchr/objx/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/v2/Makefile, vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/zeebo/xxh3/Makefile, vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/multierr/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/zap/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile, vendor/modernc.org/libc/Makefile, vendor/modernc.org/mathutil/Makefile, vendor/modernc.org/memory/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 2/326 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes142,566
source_files_sampled326
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — vendor/github.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validate/validate/validate.proto, vendor/github.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2/apierror/internal/proto/custom_error.proto, vendor/github.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2/apierror/internal/proto/error.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesvendor/github.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validate/validate/validate.proto, vendor/github.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2/apierror/internal/proto/custom_error.proto, vendor/github.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2/apierror/internal/proto/error.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

78GitHub stars
1contributors
701commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
67releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
52Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512026-012026-052026-08
Major 1Minor 5Patch 46
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-29 22:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained19 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 24
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/amazon-ion/ion-gov1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/beevik/etreev1.8.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/disintegration/imagingv1.6.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3v3.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-text/typesettingv0.3.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/gosimple/slugv1.15.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/h2non/filetypev1.1.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/hidez8891/zipv1.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/maruel/naturalv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/neurosnap/sentencesv1.1.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/rupor-github/gencfgv1.0.18go.mod
Gogithub.com/srwiley/oksvgv0.0.0-20221011165216-be6e8873101cgo.mod
Gogithub.com/srwiley/rasterxv0.0.0-20220730225603-2ab79fcdd4efgo.mod
Gogithub.com/tdewolff/parse/v2v2.8.16go.mod
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v3v3.13.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.46.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.59.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.48.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.46.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.42.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gozombiezen.com/go/sqlitev1.4.2go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.