Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 12:27 UTC

rust-embedded / cortex-m

Low level access to Cortex-M processors

RustApache-2.0★ 1,005 stars⑂ 202 forkssince Sep 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

rust-embedded/cortex-m holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (83/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (59/100). It was last updated 11 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Rust EmbeddedOrganization
3,399 followers61 public repossince Mar 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioxtaskpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.4323576 days agoautomationcodesignmacosreleasextaskcommand-line-utilities
crates.iocortex-m0.7.9510,3285926 days agoarmcortex-mperipheralregisterembeddedno-stdhardware-support
crates.iopanic-itm0.4.22,62272129 days agopanic-implitmpanic-handlercortex-marmembeddedno-std
crates.iocortex-m-rt0.7.6525,4675947 days agoarmcortex-mruntimestartupembeddedno-std
crates.iocortex-m-types0.1.02471337 days agoarmcortex-mperipheralregisterembeddedno-stdhardware-support
crates.iopanic-semihosting0.7.025,0611347 days agopanicpanic-handlerpanic-implsemihostingembeddedno-std
crates.iocortex-m-semihosting0.6.0162,6601847 days agoarmcortex-msemihostingembeddedno-std

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 11 days ago
17.3/36Commit cadence25/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume150 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year150
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push11
active_weeks_last_year25
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases15 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 11 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~227.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv0.7.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release11
mean_days_between_releases227.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
48.7/60Stars1,005 stars
19.2/25Forks202 forks
8/15Watchers28 watchers
Inputs used
forks202
stars1,005
watchers28
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads1,226,385 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescortex-m, panic-itm, cortex-m-rt, cortex-m-types, panic-semihosting, cortex-m-semihosting
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads25,976,784
monthly_downloads1,226,385
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 26% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 56 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.256
How it's scored
26.8/42Issue resolution64% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance369/403 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance3/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs369
open_issues95
closed_issues167
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.637
closed_unmerged_prs34
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach3,399 followers of rust-embedded
25/25Track record61 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,399
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginrust-embedded
public_repos61
account_age_days3,842

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable6 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 26 days ago
20/20Version history59 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescortex-m, panic-itm, cortex-m-rt, cortex-m-types, panic-semihosting, cortex-m-semihosting
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish26

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/cortex-m
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrust, no-std, arm, cortex-m, microcontroller
has_wikino
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/cortex-m
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 56 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: bare-metal 0.2.5 (unknown)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 144 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages24
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the crates:cortex-m@0.7.9 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 24 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
28.8/40Legible commit history54 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.54
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapjustfile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, cortex-m-rt/Cargo.toml, cortex-m-rt/macros/Cargo.toml, cortex-m-semihosting/Cargo.toml, cortex-m-types/Cargo.toml, cortex-m/Cargo.toml, cortex-m/macros/Cargo.toml, panic-itm/Cargo.toml, panic-semihosting/Cargo.toml, testsuite/Cargo.toml, xtask/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/132 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes46,002
source_files_sampled132
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,005GitHub stars
99contributors
150commits, last 12 months
11days since last push
15releases
3bus factor
95open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'xtask' points at a different repository (https://github.com/arcboxlabs/xtask); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'testsuite' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 202 ⇿
0Stars
202Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024020132016-112021-102026-09
Major 0Minor 1Patch 11

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 12:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 56 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 24
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iocortex-m-rt-macros=0.7.6cortex-m-rt/Cargo.toml
crates.iocritical-section1.0.0cortex-m-semihosting/Cargo.toml
crates.iobare-metal0.2.4cortex-m/Cargo.toml
crates.iocritical-section1.0.0cortex-m/Cargo.toml
crates.iovolatile-register0.2.2cortex-m/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitfield0.13.2cortex-m/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeh00.2.4cortex-m/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeh11.0.0cortex-m/Cargo.toml
crates.iocortex-m-macros=0.7.8cortex-m/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1cortex-m/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1cortex-m/Cargo.toml
crates.iocortex-m>= 0.5.8, < 0.8panic-itm/Cargo.toml
crates.iocortex-m>= 0.5.6, < 0.8panic-semihosting/Cargo.toml
crates.iocortex-m-semihosting0.6panic-semihosting/Cargo.toml
crates.iocortex-m-rttestsuite/Cargo.toml
crates.iocortex-mtestsuite/Cargo.toml
crates.iocritical-section1testsuite/Cargo.toml
crates.iocortex-m-semihostingtestsuite/Cargo.toml
crates.iodefmt-semihosting0.3testsuite/Cargo.toml
crates.iodefmt-rtt1testsuite/Cargo.toml
crates.iodefmt1testsuite/Cargo.toml
crates.ioar0.8.0xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.iocortex-mxtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1xtask/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioardirect
crates.iobare-metaldirect
crates.iobitfielddirect
crates.iocortex-mdirect
crates.iocortex-m-macros0.7.8direct
crates.iocortex-m-rt-macros0.7.6direct
crates.iocortex-m-semihostingdirect
crates.iocritical-sectiondirect
crates.iodefmtdirect
crates.iodefmt-rttdirect
crates.iodefmt-semihostingdirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.ioserde_jsondirect
crates.iovolatile-registerdirect
crates.iocompiletest_rsindirect
crates.iodefmt-testindirect
crates.ioembedded-halindirect
crates.iomacrotestindirect
crates.iopanic-haltindirect
crates.ioproc-macro2indirect
crates.ioquoteindirect
crates.iosynindirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing crates:cortex-m@0.7.9 pulls in 24 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
bare-metal0.2.5directunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.