Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 22:34 UTC

rust-lang / rust-clippy

A bunch of lints to catch common mistakes and improve your Rust code. Book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/clippy/

RustApache-2.0★ 13,461 stars⑂ 2,120 forkssince Nov 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

rust-lang/rust-clippy holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (62/100). It was last updated today. 7 contributors account for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

The Rust Programming LanguageOrganization · verified domain
18,098 followers246 public repossince Sep 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioclippypoints to another repo — not scored0.0.30227,7812102878 days agolintclippyplugindevelopment-tools
crates.ioclippy_dummy0.0.303312578 days agoclippylintplugindevelopment-tools
crates.ioclippy_lintspoints to another repo — not scored0.0.2127,7001432968 days agolintclippyplugin
crates.ioclippy_utils0.1.9910,2211744 days agoclippylintutilsdevelopment-tools
crates.ioclippy_config0.0.151943 days agoconfiglintclippydevelopment-tools

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume2,490 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,490
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases16 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recencylatest release 2,968 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~5.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagv0.0.212
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,968
mean_days_between_releases5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars13,461 stars
25/25Forks2,120 forks
10.4/15Watchers74 watchers
Inputs used
forks2,120
stars13,461
watchers74
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
53.5/80Monthly downloads10,229 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesclippy_dummy, clippy_utils, clippy_config
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads85,774
monthly_downloads10,229
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

92Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
51.3/54Bus factor7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 73 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor7
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.235
How it's scored
29.6/42Issue resolution70% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance7,611/8,574 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 15/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs7,611
open_issues2,520
closed_issues6,030
prs_merged_7d21
prs_decided_7d25
prs_merged_30d45
prs_decided_30d57
issue_closed_ratio0.705
closed_unmerged_prs963
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach18,098 followers of rust-lang
25/25Track record246 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers18,098
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginrust-lang
public_repos246
account_age_days4,729

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 44 days ago
20/20Version history17 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesclippy_dummy, clippy_utils, clippy_config
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish44

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.clippy.toml, Cargo.toml ([lints]), clippy.toml, clippy_lints/Cargo.toml ([lints]), clippy_utils/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrust, lint
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/
docs_sitehttps://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 15/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 73 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: term 0.5.2 (unknown)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,833 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages19
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the crates:clippy@0.0.302 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 19 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
35.2/40Legible commit history66 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.66
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, clippy_config/Cargo.toml, clippy_dev/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.clippy.toml, Cargo.toml ([lints]), clippy.toml, clippy_lints/Cargo.toml ([lints]), clippy_utils/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, clippy_config/Cargo.toml, clippy_dev/Cargo.toml, clippy_dummy/Cargo.toml, clippy_lints/Cargo.toml, clippy_lints_internal/Cargo.toml, clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml, clippy_utils/Cargo.toml, declare_clippy_lint/Cargo.toml, lintcheck/Cargo.toml, rustc_tools_util/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_common_metadata/fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_common_metadata/fail_publish/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_common_metadata/fail_publish_true/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_common_metadata/pass/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_common_metadata/pass_publish_empty/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_common_metadata/pass_publish_false/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/fail_both_diff/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/fail_both_same/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/fail_cargo/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/fail_clippy/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/fail_file_attr/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/pass_both_same/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/pass_cargo/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/pass_clippy/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/pass_file_attr/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/cargo_rust_version/warn_both_diff/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/definition_in_module_root/fail_edge_cases/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/definition_in_module_root/fail_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/definition_in_module_root/fail_path_attr/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/definition_in_module_root/pass_bin/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/definition_in_module_root/pass_lib_with_definitions/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/definition_in_module_root/pass_path_attr/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/duplicate_mod/fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/feature_name/fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/feature_name/pass/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/lint_groups_priority/fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/lint_groups_priority/pass/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/duplicated_mod_names_14697/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/fail_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/fail_mod_remap/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/fail_no_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/inline_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/pass_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/pass_no_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/segment_with_mod_name_10271_11916/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/segment_with_mod_name_10271_11916/foo/bar/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/with_path_attr_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/module_style/with_path_attr_no_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_config_files/no_warn/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_config_files/warn/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_crate_versions/12145_with_dashes/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_crate_versions/12176_allow_duplicate_crates/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_crate_versions/5041_allow_dev_build/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_crate_versions/fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_crate_versions/pass/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_inherent_impl/config_fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_inherent_impl/crate_fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_inherent_impl/file_fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/multiple_inherent_impl/module_fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/undocumented_unsafe_blocks/fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/wildcard_dependencies/fail/Cargo.toml, tests/ui-cargo/wildcard_dependencies/pass/Cargo.toml, tests/workspace_test/Cargo.toml, tests/workspace_test/module_style/pass_mod_with_dep_in_subdir/Cargo.toml, tests/workspace_test/module_style/pass_mod_with_dep_in_subdir/dep_no_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/workspace_test/module_style/pass_no_mod_with_dep_in_subdir/Cargo.toml, tests/workspace_test/module_style/pass_no_mod_with_dep_in_subdir/dep_with_mod/Cargo.toml, tests/workspace_test/path_dep/Cargo.toml, tests/workspace_test/subcrate/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes4/2,345 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes206,226
source_files_sampled2,345
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

13,461GitHub stars
99contributors
2,490commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
16releases
7bus factor
2,520open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 38 authors (cap 12)
  • crates package 'clippy' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rust-clippy); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'lintcheck' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'clippy_dev' from its registry
  • crates package 'clippy_lints' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rust-clippy); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'clippy_test_deps' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2,120 ⇿
0Stars
2,120Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,0002,2002,120202023-052024-122026-08

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 22:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 15/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 73 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 65
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioclippy_configCargo.toml
crates.ioclippy_lintsCargo.toml
crates.ioclippy_utilsCargo.toml
crates.iodeclare_clippy_lintCargo.toml
crates.iorustc_tools_util0.4.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioclippy_lints_internalCargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3.20Cargo.toml
crates.iocolor-print0.3.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioanstream0.6.18Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrayvec0.7clippy_config/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclippy_utilsclippy_config/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15clippy_config/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml1.1clippy_config/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.38clippy_dev/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.4clippy_dev/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindoc1.0clippy_dev/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15clippy_dev/Cargo.toml
crates.ioopener0.8clippy_dev/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustc-literal-escaper0.0.8clippy_dev/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2.3clippy_dev/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrayvec0.7clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.iocargo_metadata0.23clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclippy_configclippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclippy_utilsclippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.iodeclare_clippy_lintclippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.iomemchr2clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquine-mc_cluskey0.2clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-script0.5clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.iosemver1.0clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.2clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml1.1clippy_lints/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclippy_configclippy_lints_internal/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclippy_utilsclippy_lints_internal/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15clippy_lints_internal/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.5clippy_lints_internal/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.5.5clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.145clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0.25clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot0.12clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15clippy_test_deps/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrayvec0.7clippy_utils/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15clippy_utils/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustc_apfloat0.2.0clippy_utils/Cargo.toml
crates.iocargo_metadata0.23lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.4lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrossbeam-channel0.5.6lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iodiff0.1.13lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21.0lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.5.1lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.85lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iostrip-ansi-escapes0.2.0lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iotar0.4.45lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml1.1lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioureq2.2lintcheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2.3lintcheck/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 92

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 43 direct and 49 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanstreamdirect
crates.ioarrayvecdirect
crates.iocargo_metadatadirect
crates.iochronodirect
crates.ioclapdirect
crates.iocolor-printdirect
crates.iocrossbeam-channeldirect
crates.iodiffdirect
crates.ioflate2direct
crates.iofutures0.3.31direct
crates.ioindocdirect
crates.ioitertoolsdirect
crates.ioitertools0.15.0direct
crates.iolibc0.2.186direct
crates.iomemchrdirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.5direct
crates.ioopenerdirect
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.4direct
crates.ioquine-mc_cluskeydirect
crates.ioquote1.0.40direct
crates.iorayondirect
crates.ioregexdirect
crates.ioregex1.11.1direct
crates.ioregex-syntaxdirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.5direct
crates.iorustc-literal-escaperdirect
crates.iorustc_apfloatdirect
crates.iorustc_tools_utildirect
crates.iosemverdirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.ioserde1.0.219direct
crates.ioserde_jsondirect
crates.iostrip-ansi-escapesdirect
crates.iosyn2.0.104direct
crates.iotardirect
crates.iotempfiledirect
crates.iotokio1.46.1direct
crates.iotomldirect
crates.iounicode-normalizationdirect
crates.iounicode-scriptdirect
crates.ioureqdirect
crates.iourldirect
crates.iowalkdirdirect
crates.ioaddr2line0.25.1indirect
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.3indirect
crates.ioansi_term0.11.0indirect
crates.ioaskamaindirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.iobacktrace0.3.76indirect
crates.iobitflags2.9.1indirect
crates.iobytes1.11.1indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.1indirect
crates.ioctrlc3.1.0indirect
crates.ioeither1.15.0indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.31indirect
crates.iogimli0.32.3indirect
crates.ioio-uring0.7.8indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.13indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.9indirect
crates.iomio1.2.0indirect
crates.ioobject0.37.3indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.16indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.95indirect
crates.iopulldown-cmarkindirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.13indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.9indirect
crates.iorustc-demangle0.1.25indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.219indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.11indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.1indirect
crates.iotermindirect
crates.ioui_testindirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.18indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowinapiindirect
crates.iowinapi0.2.8indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing crates:clippy@0.0.302 pulls in 19 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
term0.5.2directunknown10.6.2-0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.