Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-06 13:36 UTC

rust-lang / thorin

DWARF packaging utility, written in Rust, supporting GNU extension and DWARF 5 package formats.

Assembly · RustCustom license★ 59 stars⑂ 17 forkssince Nov 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

rust-lang/thorin holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (80/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

17,947 followers246 public repossince Sep 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iothorin-dwp0.11.0127,187121 day agodwarfdwarf-objectdwarf-packagedwpsplit-dwarf
crates.iothorin-dwp-bin0.10.126121 day agodwarfdwarf-objectdwarf-packagedwpsplit-dwarfcommand-line-utilities

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence11/52 weeks with commits
13.9/18Commit volume34 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained27 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year34
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases4 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~52.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagthorin-dwp-bin-v0.10.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases52.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28.6/60Stars59 stars
10/25Forks17 forks
6.2/15Watchers14 watchers
Inputs used
forks17
stars59
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
68.1/80Monthly downloads127,213 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesthorin-dwp, thorin-dwp-bin
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads3,228,379
monthly_downloads127,213
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 59% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.591
How it's scored
34.4/42Issue resolution82% of issues closed
27.9/30PR acceptance39/42 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs39
open_issues2
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.818
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach17,947 followers of rust-lang
25/25Track record246 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers17,947
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginrust-lang
public_repos246
account_age_days4,712
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history12 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesthorin-dwp, thorin-dwp-bin
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/thorin-dwp
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdwarf, dwp, dwarf-package, dwarf-object, split-dwarf, split-debuginfo, elf, compiler-team, rust
has_wikino
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/thorin-dwp
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained27 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
24.7/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: anyhow 1.0.102 (unknown), memmap2 0.9.10 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages66
unassessed_packages13
affected_by_severityunknown 2
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 66 resolved dependencies against OSV. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
27.5/40Legible commit history51 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.515
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, thorin-bin/Cargo.toml, thorin/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, thorin-bin/Cargo.toml, thorin/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeAssembly without a type-check config
45/55Manageable file sizes2/11 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageAssembly
largest_source_bytes74,666
source_files_sampled11
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

59GitHub stars
13contributors
34commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
2open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 17 ⇿
0Stars
17Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201722021-122024-012026-02

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-06 13:35 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iothorin-dwp0.11.0thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.102thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.5.60thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.iomemmap20.9.10thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0.18thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.44thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.22thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-tree0.4.1thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.iotyped-arena2.0.2thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioobject0.39.0thorin-bin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15thorin/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.44thorin/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown0.17.0thorin/Cargo.toml
crates.iogimli0.34.0thorin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioobject0.39.0thorin/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 79

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 54 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhowdirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.102direct
crates.ioclapdirect
crates.ioclap4.5.60direct
crates.iogimlidirect
crates.iogimli0.34.0direct
crates.iohashbrowndirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1direct
crates.ioitertoolsdirect
crates.ioitertools0.15.0direct
crates.iomemmap2direct
crates.iomemmap20.9.10direct
crates.ioobjectdirect
crates.ioobject0.39.1direct
crates.iothiserrordirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.18direct
crates.iothorin-dwpdirect
crates.iotracingdirect
crates.iotracing0.1.44direct
crates.iotracing-subscriberdirect
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.22direct
crates.iotracing-treedirect
crates.iotracing-tree0.4.1direct
crates.iotyped-arenadirect
crates.iotyped-arena2.0.2direct
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioallocator-api20.2.21indirect
crates.ioanstream0.6.21indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.13indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.7indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.60indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.5.55indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.0.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.4indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.0indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioflate21.1.9indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.2.0indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.182indirect
crates.iolog0.4.29indirect
crates.iomatchers0.2.0indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.0indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.9indirect
crates.ionu-ansi-term0.50.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.16indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.44indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.10indirect
crates.ioruzstd0.8.2indirect
crates.iosharded-slab0.1.7indirect
crates.iosimd-adler320.3.8indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.1indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.1indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.117indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iothread_local1.1.9indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iotracing-log0.2.0indirect
crates.iotwox-hash2.1.2indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iovaluable0.1.1indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 66 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
anyhow1.0.102directunknown11.0.103
memmap20.9.10directunknown10.9.11

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.