Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 11:05 UTC

rust-osdev / uefi-rs

Rusty wrapper for the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI). This crate makes it easy to develop Rust software that leverages safe, convenient, and performant abstractions for UEFI functionality.

RustApache-2.0★ 1,670 stars⑂ 201 forkssince Nov 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#uefi#rust#osdev

rust-osdev/uefi-rs holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Security (64/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Rust OSDevOrganization
1,143 followers31 public repossince Jan 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iouefi0.41.0186,1495929 days agouefiefiembeddedapi-bindingsno-std
crates.ioxtaskpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.42775112 days agoautomationmacosreleasecodesignxtaskcommand-line-utilities
crates.iouefi-raw0.17.0302,5952029 days agouefiefiembeddedapi-bindingsno-std
crates.iouefi-macros0.20.0186,2412729 days agouefiefiembeddedapi-bindingsno-std

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 634 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year634
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

62Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 211 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~209.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_taguefi-v0.37.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release211
mean_days_between_releases209.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

83Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

79Good
How it's scored
52.3/60Stars — 1,670 stars
19.2/25Forks — 201 forks
7.2/15Watchers — 21 watchers
Inputs used
forks201
stars1,670
watchers21
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

97Exceptional
How it's scored
77.7/80Monthly downloads — 674,985 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesuefi, uefi-raw, uefi-macros
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads7,912,876
monthly_downloads674,985
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.405

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent
How it's scored
38.6/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
25.6/30PR acceptance — 1,495/1,750 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs1,495
open_issues29
closed_issues324
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d11
issue_closed_ratio0.918
closed_unmerged_prs255
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

75Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
22/25Owner reach — 1,143 followers of rust-osdev
23/25Track record — 31 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,143
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginrust-osdev
public_repos31
account_age_days3,186

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 29 days ago
20/20Version history — 59 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesuefi, uefi-raw, uefi-macros
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish29

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://rust-osdev.com/uefi-book
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsuefi, rust, osdev
has_wikino
homepagehttps://rust-osdev.com/uefi-book
docs_sitehttps://rust-osdev.com/uefi-book
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages24
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:uefi@0.41.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 24 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 84 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.923
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

75Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, template/Cargo.toml, uefi-macros/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, template/Cargo.toml, uefi-macros/Cargo.toml, uefi-raw/Cargo.toml, uefi-std-example/Cargo.toml, uefi-test-runner/Cargo.toml, uefi/Cargo.toml, xtask/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.09

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 2/269 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes236,640
source_files_sampled269
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,670GitHub stars
97contributors
634commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
4releases
2bus factor
29open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'xtask' points at a different repository (https://github.com/arcboxlabs/xtask); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'uefi-app' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'uefi-std-example' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'uefi-test-runner' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 201 ⇿
0Stars
201Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024020132018-012022-052026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 11:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 5/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 40
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iouefi0.41.0template/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.28uefi-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0.9uefi-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn3.0.0uefi-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags—uefi-raw/Cargo.toml
crates.iouguid—uefi-raw/Cargo.toml
crates.iouefi—uefi-std-example/Cargo.toml
crates.iouefi-raw—uefi-test-runner/Cargo.toml
crates.iouefi—uefi-test-runner/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmoltcp0.14uefi-test-runner/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—uefi-test-runner/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqemu-exit—uefi-test-runner/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags—uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioptr_meta—uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.iojiff—uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.iotime—uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqemu-exit—uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.iouguid—uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioucs20.3.3uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.iouefi-macros0.20.0uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.iouefi-raw0.17.0uefi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.51xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.4.0xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.iofatfs0.3.6xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.iofs-err3.0.0xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheck0.5.0xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15.0xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.iombrman0.6.0xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ionix0.31.0xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioovmf-prebuilt0.2.9xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.46xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0.21xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.10.2xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.73xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn3.0.0xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3.6.0xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2.4.0xtask/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 167

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 50 direct and 117 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow—direct
crates.ioanyhow1.0.104direct
crates.iobitflags1.3.2direct
crates.iobitflags2.13.2direct
crates.iocfg-if—direct
crates.iocfg-if1.0.5direct
crates.ioclap—direct
crates.ioclap4.6.7direct
crates.iofatfs—direct
crates.iofatfs0.3.6direct
crates.iofs-err—direct
crates.iofs-err3.3.2direct
crates.ioheck—direct
crates.ioheck0.5.0direct
crates.ioitertools—direct
crates.ioitertools0.15.0direct
crates.iojiff0.2.38direct
crates.iolog0.4.34direct
crates.iombrman—direct
crates.iombrman0.6.1direct
crates.ionix—direct
crates.ionix0.31.3direct
crates.ioovmf-prebuilt—direct
crates.ioovmf-prebuilt0.2.9direct
crates.ioproc-macro2—direct
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107direct
crates.ioptr_meta0.3.2direct
crates.ioqemu-exit4.0.0direct
crates.ioquote—direct
crates.ioquote1.0.47direct
crates.ioregex—direct
crates.ioregex1.13.1direct
crates.ioserde_json—direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.154direct
crates.iosmoltcp—direct
crates.iosmoltcp0.14.0direct
crates.iosyn—direct
crates.iosyn2.0.119direct
crates.iosyn3.0.6direct
crates.iotempfile—direct
crates.iotempfile3.27.0direct
crates.iotime0.3.55direct
crates.ioucs2—direct
crates.ioucs20.3.3direct
crates.iouefi—direct
crates.iouefi-macros—direct
crates.iouefi-raw—direct
crates.iouguid2.2.1direct
crates.iowalkdir—direct
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobase16ct1.0.0indirect
crates.iobase640.23.1indirect
crates.iobincode2.0.1indirect
crates.iobincode_derive2.0.1indirect
crates.iobit_field0.10.3indirect
crates.iobitvec1.1.1indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.12.1indirect
crates.iobyteorder1.5.0indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.1indirect
crates.iocc1.4.7indirect
crates.iocfg_aliases0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.7indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.7indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.1indirect
crates.ioconst-oid0.10.2indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.3.1indirect
crates.iocrc3.4.0indirect
crates.iocrc-catalog2.5.0indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.2.2indirect
crates.iodefmt1.1.1indirect
crates.iodefmt-macros1.1.1indirect
crates.iodefmt-parser1.0.0indirect
crates.ioderanged0.5.8indirect
crates.iodigest0.11.3indirect
crates.ioeither1.18.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.5.0indirect
crates.iofiletime0.2.29indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.13indirect
crates.iofunty2.0.0indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.ioglob0.3.4indirect
crates.iohash320.3.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheapless0.9.1indirect
crates.iohttp1.5.0indirect
crates.iohttparse1.10.1indirect
crates.iohybrid-array0.4.15indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.2indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojiff-core0.1.1indirect
crates.iojiff-static0.2.38indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolzma-rs0.3.0indirect
crates.iomanaged0.8.0indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ionum-conv0.2.2indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.2indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.15.0indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic-util0.2.8indirect
crates.iopowerfmt0.2.0indirect
crates.ioptr_meta_derive0.3.2indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.ioradium0.7.0indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.ioring0.17.14indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.5indirect
crates.iorustls0.23.45indirect
crates.iorustls-pki-types1.15.1indirect
crates.iorustls-webpki0.103.15indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde-big-array0.5.1indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.iosha20.11.0indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.1indirect
crates.iosubtle2.6.1indirect
crates.iotap1.0.1indirect
crates.iotar0.4.46indirect
crates.iotarget-tuple1.0.2indirect
crates.iotermcolor1.4.1indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.20indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.20indirect
crates.iotime-core0.1.9indirect
crates.iotoml1.1.6+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.3+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotrybuild—indirect
crates.iotrybuild1.0.121indirect
crates.iotypenum1.20.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.26indirect
crates.iountrusted0.9.0indirect
crates.iounty0.0.4indirect
crates.ioureq3.4.2indirect
crates.ioureq-proto0.6.4indirect
crates.ioutf8-zero0.8.1indirect
crates.iovirtue0.0.18indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowebpki-roots1.0.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.4indirect
crates.iowyz0.5.1indirect
crates.ioxattr1.6.1indirect
crates.iozeroize1.9.0indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:uefi@0.41.0 pulls in 24 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with rust-osdev/uefi-rs. Read them side by side →

96AFLplusplus/LibAFLAdvanced Fuzzing Library - Slot your Fuzzer together in Rust! Scales across cores and machines. For Windows, Android, MacOS, Linux, no_std, ...Exceptional96slint-ui/slintSlint is an open-source declarative GUI toolkit to build native user interfaces for Rust, C++, JavaScript, or Python apps.Exceptional95tracel-ai/burnBurn is a next generation tensor library and Deep Learning Framework that doesn't compromise on flexibility, efficiency and portability.Exceptional94unicode-org/icu4xSolving i18n for client-side and resource-constrained environments.Exceptional98wasmerio/wasmer🚀 Fast, secure, lightweight containers based on WebAssemblyExceptional98ZcashFoundation/zebraZcash - Financial Privacy in Rust 🦓Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.