Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-08 19:43 UTC

rutrum / convert-case

Converts to and from various cases.

RustMIT★ 164 stars⑂ 17 forkssince Apr 2020View on GitHub ↗

rutrum/convert-case holds a health index of 38 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (61/100) and lowest on Vitality (14/100). It was last updated 189 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

38
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

38
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

rutrumPersonal account
25 followers67 public repossince Oct 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioconvert_case0.11.036,990,59214189 days agostringcasecasingtext-processing

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

14Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 189 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
13.5/18Commit volume31 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year31
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push189
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
35.9/60Stars164 stars
10/25Forks17 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks17
stars164
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads36,990,592 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesconvert_case
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads467,331,846
monthly_downloads36,990,592
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 95% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.952
How it's scored
36.5/42Issue resolution87% of issues closed
15/30PR acceptance5/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5
open_issues3
closed_issues20
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.87
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
10.2/25Owner reach25 followers of rutrum
25/25Track record67 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers25
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginrutrum
public_repos67
account_age_days3,576
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 189 days ago
20/20Version history14 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesconvert_case
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish189

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/convert_case
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrust, case, case-converter
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/convert_case
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages85
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 85 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
2.1/40Legible commit history4 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.04
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapjustfile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentNix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/8 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes26,371
source_files_sampled8
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

164GitHub stars
4contributors
31commits, last 12 months
189days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
3open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 17 ⇿
0Stars
17Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201722021-062023-122026-07

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.4 / 10
2.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-08 19:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.9.0Cargo.toml
All dependencies 85

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.9.0direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.13indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.19.0indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap4.5.51indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.51indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.7.6indirect
crates.iocriterion0.5.1indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.5.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.6indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.21indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.ioeither1.15.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-timer3.0.3indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.31indirect
crates.ioglob0.3.3indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.16.1indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.5.2indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.13.0indirect
crates.iois-terminal0.4.17indirect
crates.ioitertools0.10.5indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.15indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.82indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.177indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.6indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.3indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.16indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.ioproc-macro-crate3.4.0indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.103indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.42indirect
crates.iorayon1.11.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.2indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.13indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.8indirect
crates.iorelative-path1.9.3indirect
crates.iorstest0.24.0indirect
crates.iorstest_macros0.24.0indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.4.1indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.20indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.27indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.145indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.11indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.110indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.7.5+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.23.10+spec-1.0.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.0.6+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.22indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.105indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.105indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.105indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.105indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.82indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowinnow0.7.14indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.27indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.27indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 85 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
crossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirectunknown10.9.20

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.