Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 10:27 UTC

ryz310 / my_api_client

A framework of Web API Client. Provides features error handling, retrying, pagination and so on.

RubyMIT★ 21 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Apr 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolNetwork servicehow this is determined
#api-client#gem#rails

ryz310/my_api_client holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (50/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ryosuke SatoPersonal account
39 followers46 public repossince Mar 2013@socialplusjp Social PLUS Inc.

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsmy_api_client2.1.0-5037 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 410 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year410
human_commit_share0.55
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 49 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 37 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~141.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count49
latest_release_tagv2.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release37
mean_days_between_releases141.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

25At Risk
How it's scored
21.1/60Stars — 21 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars21
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

65Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

67Good
How it's scored
53.9/80Total downloads — 154,367 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmy_api_client
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads154,367
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.983

Issue & PR responsiveness

61Moderate
How it's scored
30.5/42Issue resolution — 73% of issues closed
22.7/30PR acceptance — 1,007/1,329 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,007
open_issues9
closed_issues24
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.727
closed_unmerged_prs322
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.5/25Owner reach — 39 followers of ryz310
24.2/25Track record — 46 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers39
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginryz310
public_repos46
account_age_days4,921
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 37 days ago
20/20Version history — 50 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmy_api_client
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish37

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/my_api_client/2.1.0
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi-client, gem, rails
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://www.rubydoc.info/gems/my_api_client/2.1.0
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages155
unassessed_packages16
affected_by_severityhigh 1, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 155 resolved dependencies against OSV. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, my_api/AGENTS.md, rails_app/AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.ruby-lang.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 48 of 55 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.ruby-lang.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.873
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, my_api/AGENTS.md, rails_app/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,582

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 20 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 29 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.2
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.29

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/144 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes19,208
source_files_sampled144
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

21GitHub stars
6contributors
410commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
49releases
1bus factor
9open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412022-102024-082026-06
Major 1Minor 7Patch 1

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 10:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsbugsnag>= 6.19.0Gemfile
RubyGemspuma>= 6.0my_api/Gemfile
RubyGemsrails~> 8.1.3my_api/Gemfile
All dependencies 171

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 166 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsbugsnag6.30.0direct
RubyGemspuma8.0.2direct
RubyGemsrails7.2.3.2direct
RubyGemsrails8.0.5.1direct
RubyGemsrails8.1.3.1direct
RubyGemsaction_text-trix2.1.18indirect
RubyGemsaction_text-trix2.1.19indirect
RubyGemsactioncable7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactioncable8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactioncable8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionpack7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactiontext7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport—indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.8.8indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbundler—indirect
RubyGemsbyebug13.0.0indirect
RubyGemscgi0.5.2indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrack1.0.1indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.7indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.6indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.7indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday—indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.3indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.4.0indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsirb1.18.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.19.9indirect
RubyGemsjson2.20.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.2indirect
RubyGemsjsonpath—indirect
RubyGemsjsonpath1.1.5indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.25.2indirect
RubyGemsmail2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.27.0indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmulti_json1.15.0indirect
RubyGemsmulti_json1.19.1indirect
RubyGemsmulti_json1.21.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.6indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.2.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsparallel2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.12.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspry0.16.0indirect
RubyGemspry-byebug—indirect
RubyGemspry-byebug3.12.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.2indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.6indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrailties7.2.3.2indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake—indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrdoc8.0.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsreline0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrspec—indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.8indirect
RubyGemsrspec-rails8.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrspec_junit_formatter—indirect
RubyGemsrspec_junit_formatter0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.89.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.27.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rake—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.10.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec_rails—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec_rails2.32.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemssawyer—indirect
RubyGemssawyer0.9.3indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov1.1.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov1.2.0indirect
RubyGemssimplecov_json_formatter0.1.4indirect
RubyGemssqlite32.9.6indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemswebmock—indirect
RubyGemswebmock3.26.4indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsyard—indirect
RubyGemsyard0.9.45indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.3indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 155 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
addressable2.8.8indirecthigh12.9.0
json2.20.0indirectlow12.21.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ryz310/my_api_client. Read them side by side →

97primer/octiconsA scalable set of icons handcrafted with ❤️ by GitHubExceptional84ForestAdmin/forest-rails💎 Ruby on Rails agent for Forest Admin to integrate directly to your existing Ruby on Rails backend application.Excellent98chatwoot/chatwootOpen-source live-chat, email support, omni-channel desk. An alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud etc. 🔥💬Exceptional98rails/railsRuby on RailsExceptional97discourse/discourseA platform for community discussion. Free, open, simple.Exceptional96avo-hq/avoThe Essential Toolkit for building Internal Tools and admin panels with Ruby on RailsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.