Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 19:43 UTC

saade / filament-autograph

A Filament package to collect signatures.

PHP · JavaScript · BladeMIT★ 82 stars⑂ 32 forkssince Aug 2023View on GitHub ↗

#autograph #filament #form-builder #laravel #signature #signaturepad

saade/filament-autograph holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (29/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Guilherme SaadePersonal account

310 followers83 public repossince Sep 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	saade/filament-autograph	v4.2.0	26,758	14	18 days ago	laravel saade filament-autograph

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

64Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 6 days ago
6.9/36	Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
12.4/18	Commit volume — 23 commits in the last year
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

commits_last_year	23
human_commit_share	0.662
days_since_last_push	6
active_weeks_last_year	10

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 18 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~58.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	14
latest_release_tag	v4.2.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	18
mean_days_between_releases	58.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

43Weak

How it's scored

31/60	Stars — 82 stars
12.4/25	Forks — 32 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	32
stars	82
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	2
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate

How it's scored

59/80	Monthly downloads — 26,758 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	saade/filament-autograph
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	323,354
monthly_downloads	26,758
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 76% of commits
10.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	8
top_contributor_share	0.755

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good

How it's scored

34/42	Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
20.8/30	PR acceptance — 27/39 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

merged_prs	27
open_issues	4
closed_issues	17
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.81
closed_unmerged_prs	12
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.9/25	Owner reach — 310 followers of saade
25/25	Track record — 83 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	310
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	saade
public_repos	83
account_age_days	3,992

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 18 days ago
20/20	Version history — 14 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	saade/filament-autograph
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	18

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
14/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://filament.saade.dev/demo/autograph/signatures
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	autograph, filament, form-builder, laravel, signature, signaturepad
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://filament.saade.dev/demo/autograph/signatures
docs_site	https://filament.saade.dev/demo/autograph/signatures
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.8/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
6.8/7.5	Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	5.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	9
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	163
unassessed_packages	15
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 163 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

29At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

29At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
29.2/40	Legible commit history — 29 of 53 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.547
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 80
8/8	Automated maintenance — 17 of the last 80 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.212

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/14 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	7,797
source_files_sampled	14
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

82GitHub stars

8contributors

23commits, last 12 months

6days since last push

14releases

1bus factor

4open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 32 ⇿

0Stars

32Forks

12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 2Patch 9

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10

5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 19:42 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
7	CI-Tests	7 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3	Code-Review	Found 3/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10	Contributors	project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
9	Maintained	11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 3

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	filament/filament	`^4.0\|^5.0`	composer.json
Packagist	filament/forms	`^4.0\|^5.0`	composer.json
Packagist	spatie/laravel-package-tools	`^1.15.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 178

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 175 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	filament/filament	`—`	direct
Packagist	filament/forms	`—`	direct
Packagist	spatie/laravel-package-tools	`—`	direct
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	array-buffer-byte-length	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	arraybuffer.prototype.slice	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	async-function	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	available-typed-arrays	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect
npm	call-bind	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	chalk	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`6.0.6`	indirect
npm	data-view-buffer	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	data-view-byte-length	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	data-view-byte-offset	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	define-data-property	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	define-properties	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	es-abstract	`1.24.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	es-to-primitive	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	for-each	`0.3.5`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	function.prototype.name	`1.1.8`	indirect
npm	functions-have-names	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	get-symbol-description	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	globalthis	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-bigints	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-property-descriptors	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	has-proto	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	hosted-git-info	`2.8.9`	indirect
npm	internal-slot	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-array-buffer	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-async-function	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-bigint	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-boolean-object	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	is-callable	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.1`	indirect
npm	is-data-view	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-date-object	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-finalizationregistry	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-generator-function	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-map	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-negative-zero	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number-object	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-regex	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-set	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-shared-array-buffer	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-string	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-symbol	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-typed-array	`1.1.15`	indirect
npm	is-weakmap	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-weakref	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-weakset	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	isarray	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-parse-better-errors	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	load-json-file	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	memorystream	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	nice-try	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	normalize-package-data	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	npm-run-all	`4.1.5`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	object-keys	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	object.assign	`4.1.7`	indirect
npm	own-keys	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	path-type	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	pidtree	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	pify	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	possible-typed-array-names	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	prettier	`2.8.8`	indirect
npm	prettier-plugin-tailwindcss	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	read-pkg	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	reflect.getprototypeof	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	regexp.prototype.flags	`1.5.4`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.10`	indirect
npm	safe-array-concat	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	safe-push-apply	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	safe-regex-test	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.7.2`	indirect
npm	set-function-length	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	set-function-name	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	set-proto	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	shell-quote	`1.8.3`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	signature_pad	`4.1.6`	indirect
npm	spdx-correct	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-exceptions	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-expression-parse	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	spdx-license-ids	`3.0.21`	indirect
npm	stop-iteration-iterator	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.padend	`3.1.6`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.trim	`1.2.10`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.trimend	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.trimstart	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	strip-bom	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	typed-array-buffer	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	typed-array-byte-length	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	typed-array-byte-offset	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	typed-array-length	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	unbox-primitive	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	validate-npm-package-license	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	which	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	which-boxed-primitive	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	which-builtin-type	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	which-collection	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	which-typed-array	`1.1.19`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/pint	`—`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/collision	`—`	indirect
Packagist	nunomaduro/larastan	`—`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/testbench	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest-plugin-arch	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest-plugin-laravel	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/extension-installer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rules	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/laravel-ray	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 163 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
shell-quote	`1.8.3`	indirect	critical	2	`1.9.0`
brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records