Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-04 16:48 UTC

samdark / yii2-psr-log-target

Yii 2.0 log target that is able to write messages to PSR-3 compatible logger

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 84 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Mar 2017View on GitHub ↗

samdark/yii2-psr-log-target holds a health index of 25 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (62/100) and lowest on Vitality (20/100). It was last updated 235 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

25
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

25
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Alexander MakarovPersonal account
2,724 followers197 public repossince Jan 2009Twindo, Yii, Codeception, PHP-FIG

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistsamdark/yii2-psr-log-target1.1.445,68213985 days agologextensionyiipsr-3

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recency — last push 235 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.893
days_since_last_push235
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 985 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~264.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tag1.1.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release985
mean_days_between_releases264.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.1/60Stars — 84 stars
9.3/25Forks — 14 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars84
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
62.1/80Monthly downloads — 45,682 downloads/month across packagist
6.9/20Registry dependents — 10 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagessamdark/yii2-psr-log-target
dependents10
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,968,228
monthly_downloads45,682

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.52
How it's scored
33.6/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
15.5/30PR acceptance — 17/33 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs17
open_issues2
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.8
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
24.7/25Owner reach — 2,724 followers of samdark
25/25Track record — 197 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,724
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginsamdark
public_repos197
account_age_days6,408
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 985 days ago
20/20Version history — 13 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessamdark/yii2-psr-log-target
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish985

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsyii2, yii2-extension, psr-3, log, logging, logger
has_wikino
homepage
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 12/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.2
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier75
security_posture_after_multiplier32
security_posture_before_jurisdiction42
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, packaging, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.
How it's scored
9.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: yiisoft/yii2 2.0.38 (critical 9.0)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 792 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages3
assessed_packages27
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 27 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.6/40Legible commit history — 12 of 25 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.48
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 28
8/8Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 28 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.107
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/8 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes11,263
source_files_sampled8
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

84GitHub stars
10contributors
0commits, last 12 months
235days since last push
13releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿
0Stars
14Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151422017-032020-072023-11
Major 0Minor 1Patch 9

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 16:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 12/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistyiisoft/yii2~2.0.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/log~1.0.2|~1.1.0|~3.0.0composer.json
All dependencies 27

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 25 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistpsr/log1.0.2direct
Packagistyiisoft/yii22.0.38direct
Packagistbower-asset/inputmask3.3.11indirect
Packagistbower-asset/jquery3.5.1indirect
Packagistbower-asset/punycode1.3.2indirect
Packagistbower-asset/yii2-pjax2.0.7.1indirect
Packagistcebe/markdown1.2.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.0.5indirect
Packagistezyang/htmlpurifier4.13.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.7.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage2.2.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator1.4.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template1.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer1.0.9indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-token-stream1.4.11indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit4.8.35indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit-mock-objects2.3.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator1.2.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff1.4.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment1.3.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter1.2.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state1.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context1.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/version1.0.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml2.8.18indirect
Packagistyiisoft/yii2-composer2.0.10indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 27 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
yiisoft/yii22.0.38directcritical32.0.55
phpunit/phpunit4.8.35indirecthigh112.5.8
symfony/yaml2.8.18indirectmoderate38.0.12

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.