Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 00:05 UTC

samwho / spacer

CLI tool to insert spacers when command output stops

RustMIT★ 1,818 stars⑂ 23 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

samwho/spacer holds a health index of 26 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (64/100) and lowest on Vitality (25/100). It was last updated 382 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

26
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

26
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 46 is calibrated to 44 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sam RosePersonal account
1,531 followers117 public repossince Jul 2010@ngrok

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iospacer0.5.020121382 days agoclicommand-line-utilities

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 382 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push382
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases23 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 382 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~20.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv0.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release382
mean_days_between_releases20.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
52.9/60Stars1,818 stars
11.2/25Forks23 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks23
stars1,818
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
30.7/80Monthly downloads201 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesspacer
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads23,038
monthly_downloads201
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 78% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 16 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.775
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
25.7/30PR acceptance12/14 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs12
open_issues0
closed_issues20
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
22.9/25Owner reach1,531 followers of samwho
25/25Track record117 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,531
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginsamwho
public_repos117
account_age_days5,902
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 382 days ago
20/20Version history21 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesspacer
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish382

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://github.com/samwho/spacer
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscli
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/samwho/spacer
docs_sitehttps://github.com/samwho/spacer
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 16 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.3
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: anyhow 1.0.95 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages2
assessed_packages106
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitylow 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 106 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.1/40Legible commit history17 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.17
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/1 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes19,454
source_files_sampled1
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,818GitHub stars
7contributors
0commits, last 12 months
382days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 23 ⇿
0Stars
23Forks
17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242322023-062025-012026-08
Major 0Minor 2Patch 14

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 00:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 16 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioclap4.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioterminal_size0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iolazy_static1.5Cargo.toml
crates.ioowo-colors4Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioenv_logger0.11Cargo.toml
crates.iohuman-panic2.0Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono-tz0.10Cargo.toml
All dependencies 106

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 96 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow1.0.95direct
crates.iochrono0.4.39direct
crates.iochrono-tz0.10.0direct
crates.ioclap4.5.26direct
crates.ioenv_logger0.11.6direct
crates.iohuman-panic2.0.2direct
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0direct
crates.iolog0.4.22direct
crates.ioowo-colors4.1.0direct
crates.ioterminal_size0.4.1direct
crates.ioaddr2line0.24.2indirect
crates.ioadler22.0.0indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.3indirect
crates.ioandroid-tzdata0.1.1indirect
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstream0.6.18indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.10indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.2indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.6indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.4.0indirect
crates.iobacktrace0.3.74indirect
crates.iobitflags2.7.0indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.16.0indirect
crates.iocc1.2.7indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0indirect
crates.iochrono-tz-build0.4.0indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.26indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.5.24indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.7.4indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.3indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.ioenv_filter0.1.3indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.1indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.10indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.15indirect
crates.iogimli0.31.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.2indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.4.0indirect
crates.iohumantime2.1.0indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone0.1.61indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone-haiku0.1.2indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.7.0indirect
crates.iois-terminal0.4.13indirect
crates.iois_ci1.2.0indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.1indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.76indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.169indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.4.15indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.4indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.2indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioobject0.36.7indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.20.2indirect
crates.ioos_info3.9.2indirect
crates.ioparse-zoneinfo0.3.1indirect
crates.iophf0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_codegen0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_generator0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_shared0.11.3indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.92indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.38indirect
crates.iorand0.8.5indirect
crates.iorand_core0.6.4indirect
crates.ioregex1.11.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.9indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.5indirect
crates.iorustc-demangle0.1.24indirect
crates.iorustix0.38.43indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.217indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.217indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned0.6.8indirect
crates.ioshlex1.3.0indirect
crates.iosiphasher1.0.1indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosupports-color2.1.0indirect
crates.iosupports-color3.0.2indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.96indirect
crates.iotest-case3.3.1indirect
crates.iotest-case-core3.3.1indirect
crates.iotest-case-macros3.3.1indirect
crates.iotoml0.8.19indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.6.8indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.22.22indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.14indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iouuid1.11.1indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.99indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-backend0.2.99indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.99indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.99indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.99indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 106 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rand0.8.5indirectlow20.10.1
anyhow1.0.95directunknown11.0.103

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.