Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 10:54 UTC

sanchezzzhak / node-device-detector

Universal library for detecting devices based on the string `UserAgent`. We can identify: App, Bot, OS, Browser, Device brand, Device model and Device type (smartphone, phablet, tablet, desktop, TV and other types, total 13)

JavaScriptNo license detected★ 185 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Aug 2016View on GitHub ↗

sanchezzzhak/node-device-detector holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Tutik AlexsandrPersonal account
33 followers77 public repossince Jan 2012@Infinitiweb

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence9/52 weeks with commits
12.1/18Commit volume21 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year21
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases50 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 42 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~69 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count50
latest_release_tag2.2.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release42
mean_days_between_releases69
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.7/60Stars185 stars
11.5/25Forks25 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks25
stars185
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
70.8/80Monthly downloads202,581 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesnode-device-detector
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads202,581
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.982
How it's scored
38.3/42Issue resolution91% of issues closed
28.9/30PR acceptance212/220 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs212
open_issues2
closed_issues21
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.913
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
11/25Owner reach33 followers of sanchezzzhak
25/25Track record77 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers33
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginsanchezzzhak
public_repos77
account_age_days5,354
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 42 days ago
20/20Version history74 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnode-device-detector
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish42

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.cjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests13 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://codesandbox.io/p/devbox/demo-node-device-detect-forked-mwfx8e
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdevice-detector, mobile-detection, os-detection, browser-detection, user-agent
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://codesandbox.io/p/devbox/demo-node-device-detect-forked-mwfx8e
docs_sitehttps://codesandbox.io/p/devbox/demo-node-device-detect-forked-mwfx8e
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests13 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
4/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories27
affected_packages11
assessed_packages193
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 8, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 193 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history89 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.927
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.cjs
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
51.2/55Manageable file sizes8/115 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes1,734,558
source_files_sampled115
oversized_source_files8

Key facts

185GitHub stars
13contributors
21commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
50releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 25 ⇿
0Stars
25Forks
50Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05101520252522017-042021-122026-09
Major 1Minor 3Patch 46

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 10:54 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests13 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
8SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 193

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 193 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.4.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.1indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc2.1.4indirect
npm@eslint/js8.57.1indirect
npm@fast-csv/format5.0.2indirect
npm@fast-csv/parse5.0.2indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.13.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema2.0.3indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/semver7.5.8indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin5.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser5.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager5.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils5.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types5.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree5.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils5.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys5.62.0indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.3.0indirect
npmacorn8.14.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.3indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmassertion-error1.1.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbenchmark2.1.4indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchai4.5.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcheck-error1.0.3indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcli-table0.3.11indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolors1.0.3indirect
npmcommander11.1.0indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdeep-eql4.1.4indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdiff5.2.0indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint8.57.1indirect
npmeslint-scope5.1.1indirect
npmeslint-scope7.2.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmespree9.6.1indirect
npmesquery1.6.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.19.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmflat-cache3.2.0indirect
npmflatted3.3.2indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-func-name2.0.2indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob8.1.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals13.24.0indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.1indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.23indirect
npmlodash.escaperegexp4.1.2indirect
npmlodash.groupby4.6.0indirect
npmlodash.isboolean3.0.3indirect
npmlodash.isequal4.5.0indirect
npmlodash.isfunction3.0.9indirect
npmlodash.isnil4.0.0indirect
npmlodash.isundefined3.0.1indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlodash.uniq4.5.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmloupe2.3.7indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimatch5.1.6indirect
npmmocha10.8.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnatural-compare-lite1.4.0indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpathval1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmplatform1.3.6indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmprettier2.8.8indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.7.0indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.2indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtslib1.14.1indirect
npmtsutils3.21.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-detect4.1.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmtypescript4.9.5indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmworkerpool6.5.1indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs16.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.9indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 193 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
flatted3.3.2indirectcritical23.4.2
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
brace-expansion2.0.1indirecthigh55.0.9
js-yaml4.3.1indirecthigh14.3.2
lodash4.17.23indirecthigh24.18.0
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
minimatch5.1.6indirecthigh310.2.3
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
serialize-javascript6.0.2indirecthigh27.0.5
ajv6.12.6indirectmoderate18.18.0
diff5.2.0indirectmoderate18.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.