Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 15:12 UTC

sap / valkey-operator-cop

Go · Makefile · Go TemplateApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Jul 2024View on GitHub ↗
#sap-cns#sap-cs-devops

sap/valkey-operator-cop holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (42/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SAPOrganization
4,336 followers309 public repossince Oct 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/sap/valkey-operator-copv0.1.22-232 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 102 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year102
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 23 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv0.1.22
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases18.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

4Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

55Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 48% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.483

Issue & PR responsiveness

64Moderate
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
24.2/30PR acceptance — 21/26 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs21
open_issues1
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach — 4,336 followers of SAP
25/25Track record — 309 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,336
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginSAP
public_repos309
account_age_days5,025
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 23 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/sap/valkey-operator-cop
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

46Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssap-cns, sap-cs-devops
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/7 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes5,260
source_files_sampled7
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
9contributors
102commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
23releases
2bus factor
1open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 15:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained25 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pkg/apis/monitoringv0.88.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sap/component-operator-runtimev0.3.151go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiextensions-apiserverv0.35.1go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.35.1go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.35.1go.mod
Gok8s.io/code-generatorv0.35.1go.mod
Gok8s.io/kube-aggregatorv0.35.1go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtimev0.23.3go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/tools/setup-envtestv0.0.0-20260120065648-aebc15d7c689go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-toolsv0.20.1go.mod
All dependencies 96

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 85 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pkg/apis/monitoringv0.88.0direct
Gogithub.com/sap/component-operator-runtimev0.3.151direct
Gok8s.io/apiextensions-apiserverv0.35.1direct
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.35.1direct
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.35.1direct
Gok8s.io/code-generatorv0.35.1direct
Gok8s.io/kube-aggregatorv0.35.1direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtimev0.23.3direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/tools/setup-envtestv0.0.0-20260120065648-aebc15d7c689direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-toolsv0.20.1direct
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perksv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/blang/semver/v4v4.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/drone/envsubstv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3v3.12.2indirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch/v5v5.9.11indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fxamacker/cbor/v2v2.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errorsv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/zaprv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointerv0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreferencev0.20.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swagv0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gobuffalo/flectv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/globv0.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/google/btreev1.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic-modelsv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/huandu/xstringsv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/iancoleman/strcasev0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/internv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/goutilsv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/sprig/v3v3.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructurev1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalkv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.3-0.20250322232337-35a7c28c31eeindirect
Gogithub.com/monochromegane/go-gitignorev0.0.0-20200626010858-205db1a8cc00indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.23.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.66.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.16.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sap/go-genericsv0.2.63indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/x448/float16v0.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/xlab/treeprintv1.2.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v2v2.4.3indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.50.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.35.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.53.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.30.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.42.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.11.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.44.0indirect
Gogomodules.xyz/jsonpatch/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.8indirect
Gogopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4v4.13.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v0v0.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/apiv0.35.1indirect
Gok8s.io/gengo/v2v2.0.0-20250922181213-ec3ebc5fd46bindirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.130.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapiv0.0.0-20250910181357-589584f1c912indirect
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20251002143259-bc988d571ff4indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/cli-utilsv0.37.2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/jsonv0.0.0-20250730193827-2d320260d730indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/kustomize/apiv0.21.1indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyamlv0.21.1indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/randfillv1.0.0indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v6v6.4.0indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.6.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with sap/valkey-operator-cop. Read them side by side →

88SAP/admission-webhook-runtimeA generic Kubernetes admission webhook implementation frameworkExcellent87SAP/secret-generatorKubernetes Secret GeneratorExcellent87SAP/component-operator-runtimeA framework that supports creating opinionated Kubernetes operators managing the lifecycle of arbitrary deployment components of Kubernetes clusters.Excellent87SAP/pod-reloaderAn operator to reload Kubernetes pods on configuration changesExcellent87SAP/image-mapperKubernetes admission webhook to rewrite container imagesExcellent87SAP/registry-credential-injectorKubernetes admission webhook to inject registry pull credentials into podsExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.