Software health reportschema 0.23.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 21:34 UTC

seamapi / php

PHP SDK for using Seam Connect to control door locks and other IoT devices

PHPNo license detected★ 5 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗

seamapi/php holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (30/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SeamOrganization

48 followers95 public repossince Apr 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Packagist	seamapi/seam	v2.145.0	28,896	155	71 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
17.3/36	Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 125 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	125
human_commit_share	0.55
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	25

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 71 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v2.145.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	71
mean_days_between_releases	3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

16Critical

How it's scored

9.8/60	Stars — 5 stars
5/25	Forks — 5 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	5
stars	5
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	below_threshold

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate

How it's scored

59.5/80	Monthly downloads — 28,896 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	seamapi/seam
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	136,976
monthly_downloads	28,896
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

40Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 67% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	13
top_contributor_share	0.667

Issue & PR responsiveness

63Moderate

How it's scored

38.6/42	Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
16.1/30	PR acceptance — 218/407 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	218
open_issues	3
closed_issues	34
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.919
closed_unmerged_prs	189
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

84Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
12.2/25	Owner reach — 48 followers of seamapi
25/25	Track record — 95 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	48
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	seamapi
public_repos	95
account_age_days	2,285

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 71 days ago
20/20	Version history — 155 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	seamapi/seam
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	71

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 1 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	maintained
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

44Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 56 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

78Good

How it's scored

18.5/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.5.0 (moderate 5.9)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	56
affected_packages	12
assessed_packages	178
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 8, moderate 4
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 178 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

5Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
4.8/40	Legible commit history — 5 of 55 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.091
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 45 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.45

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/247 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	202,215
source_files_sampled	247
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

5GitHub stars

13contributors

125commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

3open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 5 ★ / 5 ⇿

5Stars

5Forks

100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 96Patch 4

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10

4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 21:34 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
10	Maintained	12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	56 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 1

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`^7.5`	composer.json

All dependencies 178

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 177 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.5.0`	direct
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@prettier/plugin-php	`0.24.0`	indirect
npm	@seamapi/nextlove-sdk-generator	`1.19.10`	indirect
npm	@seamapi/types	`1.827.0`	indirect
npm	aggregate-error	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	axios	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	camel-case	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	capital-case	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	change-case	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	clean-stack	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	constant-case	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	del	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	dir-glob	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	dot-case	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.2`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.15.11`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	get-tsconfig	`4.13.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	globby	`13.2.2`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	header-case	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.1`	indirect
npm	indent-string	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-cwd	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	linguist-languages	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.23`	indirect
npm	lower-case	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	no-case	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	p-map	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	param-case	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	pascal-case	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	path-case	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-type	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	php-parser	`3.2.5`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	resolve-pkg-maps	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	sentence-case	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	slash	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	snake-case	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	tsx	`4.21.0`	indirect
npm	upper-case	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	upper-case-first	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	zod	`3.24.2`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/instantiator	`1.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`1.5.2`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`4.15.1`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`9.2.17`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`3.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`5.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`9.5.24`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`1.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	ralouphie/getallheaders	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`1.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`1.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`4.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`5.1.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`4.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`5.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`1.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/resource-operations	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`3.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.2.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 178 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
axios	`1.13.4`	indirect	high	29	`1.18.0`
brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect	high	3	`5.0.7`
braces	`3.0.2`	indirect	high	1	`3.0.3`
form-data	`4.0.5`	indirect	high	1	`4.0.6`
lodash	`4.17.23`	indirect	high	2	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
phpunit/phpunit	`9.5.24`	indirect	high	1	`12.5.8`
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.5.0`	direct	moderate	7	`7.15.1`
follow-redirects	`1.15.11`	indirect	moderate	1	`1.16.0`
guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.4.1`	indirect	moderate	5	`2.12.3`
micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.0.8`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.23.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records