Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 22:40 UTC

seanchatmangpt / bcinr

RustNo license detected★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

seanchatmangpt/bcinr holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (83/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (27/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sean ChatmanPersonal account
54 followers314 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioggenpoints to another repo — not scored26.8.6581839 days agoclicode-generationrdftemplatescommand-line-utilitiesdevelopment-tools
crates.iobcinr-cmca26.7.281,478146 days agoalgorithmscmcadeterministicrdf
crates.iobcinr-pddl26.7.2816246 days agopddlplanningprologreceiptworkflowalgorithms
crates.iobcinr-powl26.7.285,417346 days agoblake3branchlessconformancepetriworkflowalgorithmsdata-structures
crates.iobcinr-logic26.7.286,504646 days agobranchlessperformancesimdalgorithmsno-std
crates.iobcinr-mfw-ir26.7.281,355146 days agoconcurrencypddlplanningreceiptworkflowalgorithms

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 764 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year764
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 2 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 46 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv26.7.28
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release46
mean_days_between_releases3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

27At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55.6/80Monthly downloads — 14,770 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesbcinr-cmca, bcinr-pddl, bcinr-powl, bcinr-logic, bcinr-mfw-ir
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads44,502
monthly_downloads14,770
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.891
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
19.7/30PR acceptance — 21/32 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs21
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.5/25Owner reach — 54 followers of seanchatmangpt
19.5/25Track record — 314 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers54
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginseanchatmangpt
public_repos314
account_age_days1,189
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 46 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbcinr-cmca, bcinr-pddl, bcinr-powl, bcinr-logic, bcinr-mfw-ir
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish46

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/bcinr-cmca
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/bcinr-cmca
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

29At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
4.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no data
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 45 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, SAST, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.96
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes31,356
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — observatory-ui/tsconfig.json, tools/observatory-ui/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsobservatory-ui/tsconfig.json, tools/observatory-ui/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/bcinr-cmca/Cargo.toml, crates/bcinr-guarded/Cargo.toml, crates/bcinr-logic/Cargo.toml, crates/bcinr-mfw-ir/Cargo.toml, crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml, crates/bcinr-powl/Cargo.toml, crates/encode_unicode_patch/Cargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml, oracles/powl/runner/Cargo.toml, tools/bcinr-bench-auditor/Cargo.toml, tools/bcinr-cheat-scanner/Cargo.toml, tools/bcinr-contract-gate/Cargo.toml, tools/bcinr-reporter/Cargo.toml, tools/ggen/Cargo.toml, tools/rust_audit/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 6/818 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes110,223
source_files_sampled818
oversized_source_files6
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
764commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'ggen' points at a different repository (https://github.com/seanchatmangpt/ggen); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'rust_audit' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'bcinr-guarded' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 22:40 UTC

6Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests1 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :105:61: could not parse as YAML: mapping values are not allowed in this context [syntax-check]
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackaginginternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :105:61: could not parse as YAML: mapping values are not allowed in this context [syntax-check]
n/aPinned-Dependenciesinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :105:61: could not parse as YAML: mapping values are not allowed in this context [syntax-check]
n/aSASTinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :105:61: could not parse as YAML: mapping values are not allowed in this context [syntax-check]
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-Permissionsinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :105:61: could not parse as YAML: mapping values are not allowed in this context [syntax-check]
0Vulnerabilities45 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 56
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@deck.gl/layers^9.3.7observatory-ui/package.json
npm@deck.gl/react^9.3.7observatory-ui/package.json
npmdeck.gl^9.3.7observatory-ui/package.json
npmmapbox-gl^3.26.0observatory-ui/package.json
npmreact^19.2.7observatory-ui/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.7observatory-ui/package.json
npmreact-map-gl^8.1.1observatory-ui/package.json
npmnext15.3.3web/package.json
npmreact^19.0.0web/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.0.0web/package.json
crates.iobcinr-logic26.7.28crates/bcinr-cmca/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1crates/bcinr-cmca/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/bcinr-cmca/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr-powl—crates/bcinr-guarded/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr-cmca—crates/bcinr-guarded/Cargo.toml
crates.iocriterion0.5crates/bcinr-logic/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblake31crates/bcinr-mfw-ir/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblake31crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprolog826.6.25crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm4pm-compat26.6.29crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr-mfw-ir26.7.28crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr-powl26.7.28crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr-cmca26.7.28crates/bcinr-pddl/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr-logic26.7.28crates/bcinr-powl/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr-mfw-ir26.7.28crates/bcinr-powl/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr-cmca26.7.28crates/bcinr-powl/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblake31crates/bcinr-powl/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm4pm-compat26.6.29crates/bcinr-powl/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1crates/bcinr-powl/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/bcinr-powl/Cargo.toml
crates.ioascii^1.0.0crates/encode_unicode_patch/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0.117tools/bcinr-bench-auditor/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0tools/bcinr-bench-auditor/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2tools/bcinr-cheat-scanner/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2tools/bcinr-cheat-scanner/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0tools/bcinr-cheat-scanner/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0tools/bcinr-cheat-scanner/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0tools/bcinr-contract-gate/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2.4tools/bcinr-contract-gate/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0tools/bcinr-contract-gate/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprettytable-rs0.10.0tools/bcinr-reporter/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0tools/bcinr-reporter/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0tools/bcinr-reporter/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.9tools/bcinr-reporter/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8tools/ggen/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2.4tools/ggen/Cargo.toml
npm@deck.gl/core^9.3.7tools/observatory-ui/package.json
npm@deck.gl/layers^9.3.7tools/observatory-ui/package.json
npm@deck.gl/react^9.3.7tools/observatory-ui/package.json
npmdeck.gl^9.3.7tools/observatory-ui/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.24.0tools/observatory-ui/package.json
npmreact^19.2.7tools/observatory-ui/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.7tools/observatory-ui/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.