Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 22:29 UTC

seaswalker / spring-analysis

Spring源码阅读

JavaNo license detected★ 13,748 stars⑂ 4,113 forkssince Sep 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

seaswalker/spring-analysis holds a health index of 16 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (65/100) and lowest on Vitality (1/100). It was last updated 1252 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

16
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

16
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 33 is calibrated to 27 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

skywalkerPersonal account
1,361 followers62 public repossince Apr 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

1Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 1,252 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push1,252
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars13,748 stars
25/25Forks4,113 forks
15/15Watchers591 watchers
Inputs used
forks4,113
stars13,748
watchers591
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

38Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.979
How it's scored
12.3/42Issue resolution29% of issues closed
13.1/30PR acceptance7/16 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs7
open_issues12
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.294
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
22.5/25Owner reach1,361 followers of seaswalker
25/25Track record62 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,361
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginseaswalker
public_repos62
account_age_days4,144
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

38Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsspring, notes, source-code-analysis
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

24At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities64 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
2.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories10 affected: org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-mapper-asl 1.9.13 (critical 9.8), org.springframework:spring-web 4.3.18.RELEASE (critical 9.8), org.springframework:spring-webmvc 4.3.18.RELEASE (critical 9.8), +7 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
13.5/40No advisories left outstanding10 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,395 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories49
affected_packages10
assessed_packages19
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitycritical 3, high 5, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages10
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 19 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
4.4/40Legible commit history8 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.082
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrappom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/32 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes2,171
source_files_sampled32
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

13,748GitHub stars
3contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,252days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
12open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-21: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 13748 stars today.
  • Could not fetch maven package 'skywalker:spring' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 13,742 ★ / 4,113 ⇿
13,742Stars
4,113Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-21. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

2,0004,0006,0008,00010,00012,00014,00013,7424,113422021-072024-022026-08

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.4 / 10
2.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 22:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 4/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities64 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-core${spring-version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-context${spring-version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-web${spring-version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-jdbc${spring-version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-tx${spring-version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvc${spring-version}pom.xml
Mavenjavax.servlet:jstl1.2pom.xml
Mavenorg.aspectj:aspectjweaver1.8.9pom.xml
Mavenjunit:junit4.12pom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guava21.0pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.1pom.xml
Mavencom.google.j2objc:j2objc-annotations1.3pom.xml
Mavenorg.codehaus.jackson:jackson-mapper-asl1.9.13pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.10.0.pr1pom.xml
Mavenmysql:mysql-connector-java5.1.20pom.xml
Mavencglib:cglib3.2.5pom.xml
Mavenorg.hibernate.validator:hibernate-validator6.1.0.Finalpom.xml
All dependencies 20

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 3 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencglib:cglib3.2.5direct
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.10.0.pr1direct
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.1direct
Mavencom.google.guava:guava21.0direct
Mavencom.google.j2objc:j2objc-annotations1.3direct
Mavenjavax.servlet:jstl1.2direct
Mavenjunit:junit4.12direct
Mavenmysql:mysql-connector-java5.1.20direct
Mavenorg.aspectj:aspectjweaver1.8.9direct
Mavenorg.codehaus.jackson:jackson-mapper-asl1.9.13direct
Mavenorg.hibernate.validator:hibernate-validator6.1.0.Finaldirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-context4.3.18.RELEASEdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-core4.3.18.RELEASEdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-jdbc4.3.18.RELEASEdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-tx4.3.18.RELEASEdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-web4.3.18.RELEASEdirect
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvc4.3.18.RELEASEdirect
Mavenjavax.servlet:javax.servlet-api3.1.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.tomcat.maven:tomcat7-maven-plugin2.2indirect
Dependency advisories 10

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 19 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 10 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-mapper-asl1.9.13directcritical2
org.springframework:spring-web4.3.18.RELEASEdirectcritical66.1.14
org.springframework:spring-webmvc4.3.18.RELEASEdirectcritical117.0.8
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.10.0.pr1directhigh103.1.4
mysql:mysql-connector-java5.1.20directhigh88.2.0
org.hibernate.validator:hibernate-validator6.1.0.Finaldirecthigh37.0.0.CR1
org.springframework:spring-context4.3.18.RELEASEdirecthigh36.2.7
org.springframework:spring-core4.3.18.RELEASEdirecthigh27.0.8
com.google.guava:guava21.0directmoderate332.0.0-android
junit:junit4.12directmoderate14.13.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.