Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-29 23:56 UTC

sebadob / s3-simple

simple, fast and efficient s3 client for bucket operations

RustApache-2.0★ 20 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Apr 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

sebadob/s3-simple holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (68/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (27/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

48
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

sebadobPersonal account
85 followers29 public repossince Mar 2020

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ios3-simple0.9.04,806124 days agoasyncawsclients3tokioapi-bindings

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

52Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
10/18Commit volume — 12 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year12
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year6

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 12 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~96.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tagv0.9.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases96.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

28At Risk
How it's scored
20.7/60Stars — 20 stars
7.5/25Forks — 9 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars20
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate
How it's scored
49.1/80Monthly downloads — 4,806 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagess3-simple
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads58,268
monthly_downloads4,806
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

17Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 88% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.881

Issue & PR responsiveness

88Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28.8/30PR acceptance — 25/26 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs25
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.9/25Owner reach — 85 followers of sebadob
22.8/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers85
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginsebadob
public_repos29
account_age_days2,344
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 12 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagess3-simple
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

27At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/s3-simple
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/s3-simple
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

23At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
22.6/40Legible commit history — 25 of 59 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.424
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

32At Risk
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 59
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, examples/bucket-ops/Cargo.toml, examples/streaming/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/10 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes41,123
source_files_sampled10
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

20GitHub stars
4contributors
12commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿
0Stars
9Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810912024-052025-072026-08
Major 0Minor 5Patch 2

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-29 23:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 7/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iobase640.23Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.11.1Cargo.toml
crates.iodotenvy0.15Cargo.toml
crates.ioflume0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3.30Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4.3Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac0.13Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp1.1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iomd50.8.0Cargo.toml
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioquick-xml0.42Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.13.3Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-webpki0.103.13Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.197Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.11Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2Cargo.toml
crates.iotime0.3.47Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.37.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.37Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.5.0Cargo.toml
crates.iowebpki-root-certs1.0.6Cargo.toml
All dependencies 23

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 2 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobase64—direct
crates.iobytes—direct
crates.iodotenvy—direct
crates.ioflume—direct
crates.iofutures-util—direct
crates.iohex—direct
crates.iohmac—direct
crates.iohttp—direct
crates.iomd5—direct
crates.iopercent-encoding—direct
crates.ioquick-xml—direct
crates.ioreqwest—direct
crates.iorustls-webpki—direct
crates.ioserde—direct
crates.iosha2—direct
crates.iothiserror—direct
crates.iotime—direct
crates.iotokio—direct
crates.iotracing—direct
crates.iourl—direct
crates.iowebpki-root-certs—direct
crates.iopretty_assertions—indirect
crates.iotracing-test—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with sebadob/s3-simple. Read them side by side →

96awslabs/mountpoint-s3A simple, high-throughput file client for mounting an Amazon S3 bucket as a local file system.Exceptional96aws/aws-lambda-rust-runtimeA Rust runtime for AWS LambdaExceptional98open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rustThe Rust OpenTelemetry implementationExceptional96microsoft/oxidizerOxidizer is a platform for Rust service development which bridges the gaps in the crate ecosystem to deliver a turn-key solution to enable the efficient creation of high-scale high-availability and high-performance services in Rust.Exceptional94nats-io/nats.rsRust client for NATS, the cloud native messaging system.Exceptional94kube-rs/kubeRust Kubernetes client and controller runtimeExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.