Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-13 02:54 UTC

selfrefactor / rambda

Typescript focused FP library similar to Remeda and Ramda

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 1,755 stars⑂ 89 forkssince Jan 2017View on GitHub ↗

#fp #ramda #lodash #utils #functional-programming #typescript #functions #functional #utility

selfrefactor/rambda holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Deyan TotevPersonal account

183 followers11 public repossince Aug 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	rambda	11.2.0	11,622,758	221	89 days ago	curried fp functional generics lodash ramda remeda stdlib toolkit ts types typescript utilities utility utils

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

54Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 7 days ago
3.5/36	Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
11.3/18	Commit volume — 17 commits in the last year
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

commits_last_year	17
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	7
active_weeks_last_year	5

Release discipline

70Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 73 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 263 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~58 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	73
latest_release_tag	v10.3.4
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	263
mean_days_between_releases	58

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

85Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

75Good

How it's scored

52.6/60	Stars — 1,755 stars
16.2/25	Forks — 89 forks
6.4/15	Watchers — 15 watchers

Inputs used

forks	89
stars	1,755
watchers	15
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 11,622,758 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	rambda
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	11,622,758
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 58 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	58
top_contributor_share	0.887

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.6/30	PR acceptance — 468/548 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	468
open_issues	0
closed_issues	240
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	80
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16.3/25	Owner reach — 183 followers of selfrefactor
19.9/25	Track record — 11 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	183
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	selfrefactor
public_repos	11
account_age_days	5,111

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 89 days ago
20/20	Version history — 221 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	rambda
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	89

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://selfrefactor.github.io/rambda/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 9 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	fp, ramda, lodash, utils, functional-programming, typescript, functions, functional, utility
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://selfrefactor.github.io/rambda/
docs_site	https://selfrefactor.github.io/rambda/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
2.2/7.5	Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 8 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	8
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	190
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 4
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 190 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

14Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.4/40	Legible commit history — 27 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.27
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11	Static type checking — source/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	source/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (source/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json)
54.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/541 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	112,588
source_files_sampled	541
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

1,755GitHub stars

58contributors

17commits, last 12 months

7days since last push

73releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 89 ⇿

0Stars

89Forks

73Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 5Minor 25Patch 33

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10

4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-13 02:53 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
3	Maintained	3 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2	Vulnerabilities	8 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 190

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 190 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.28.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	@bcoe/v8-coverage	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.130.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.2`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.2`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/mocha	`10.0.10`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`25.8.0`	indirect
npm	@types/tinycolor2	`1.4.6`	indirect
npm	@vitest/coverage-v8	`5.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`5.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`5.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`5.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`5.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`5.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-align	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	ast-v8-to-istanbul	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	boxen	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	cfonts	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	chai	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`5.6.2`	indirect
npm	cli-boxes	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	define-property	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`10.6.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	env-fn	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`11.3.2`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-east-asian-width	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	get-own-enumerable-property-symbols	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	gradient-string	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	helpers-fn	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	html-escaper	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-accessor-descriptor	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-buffer	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	is-data-descriptor	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-descriptor	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-number	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-obj	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-plain-object	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-regexp	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-unicode-supported	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	isobject	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-coverage	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	istanbul-lib-report	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	istanbul-reports	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`10.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	kind-of	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	log-symbols	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	magicast	`0.5.3`	indirect
npm	make-dir	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect
npm	node-os-utils	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	obug	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.14`	indirect
npm	q-i	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	radashi	`13.0.0-beta.ffa4778`	indirect
npm	rambda	`6.4.0`	indirect
npm	rambdax	`11.3.0`	indirect
npm	rambdax	`11.3.1`	indirect
npm	ramda	`0.32.0`	indirect
npm	remeda	`2.34.1`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.1`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	string-fn	`3.6.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	stringify-object	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinycolor2	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.15`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.16`	indirect
npm	tinygradient	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	ts-toolbelt	`9.6.0`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`4.41.0`	indirect
npm	types-ramda	`0.31.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.24.6`	indirect
npm	universalify	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.0.13`	indirect
npm	vitest	`5.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	widest-line	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	window-size	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`9.0.2`	indirect
npm	yoctocolors	`2.1.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 190 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect	high	2	`5.1.16`
picomatch	`4.0.3`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
postcss	`8.5.14`	indirect	high	2	`8.5.23`
vite	`8.0.13`	indirect	high	2	`8.0.16`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records