Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 07:36 UTC

sensiolabs / GotenbergBundle

A Symfony Bundle for interacting with Gotenberg. Integrates natively with twig, router, PHPStorm and more !

PHPMIT★ 240 stars⑂ 34 forkssince Dec 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryhow this is determined

sensiolabs/GotenbergBundle holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Security (54/100). It was last updated 33 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SensioLabsOrganization · verified domain
75 followers16 public repossince May 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistsensiolabs/gotenberg-bundlev1.4.0107,7101468 days agosymfonybundlepdfscreenshotofficegotenberg

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 33 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
16.2/18Commit volume — 62 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year62
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push33
active_weeks_last_year22
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 68 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~51.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv1.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release68
mean_days_between_releases51.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.6/60Stars — 240 stars
12.7/25Forks — 34 forks
5.6/15Watchers — 11 watchers
Inputs used
forks34
stars240
watchers11
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
67.1/80Monthly downloads — 107,710 downloads/month across packagist
4/20Registry dependents — 3 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagessensiolabs/gotenberg-bundle
dependents3
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads665,381
monthly_downloads107,710
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 38% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 21 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.378
How it's scored
34.7/42Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance — 166/190 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs166
open_issues16
closed_issues76
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.826
closed_unmerged_prs24
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
13.5/25Owner reach — 75 followers of sensiolabs
21/25Track record — 16 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers75
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginsensiolabs
public_repos16
account_age_days5,259

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 68 days ago
20/20Version history — 14 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessensiolabs/gotenberg-bundle
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish68

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgotenberg, pdf, pdf-generation, php, screenshot, symfony, symfony-bundle, csv, html, markdown, office
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 97 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.97
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,820
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/254 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes42,296
source_files_sampled254
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

240GitHub stars
21contributors
62commits, last 12 months
33days since last push
14releases
2bus factor
16open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'daggermodule/gotenbergbundle' from its registry
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 34 ⇿
0Stars
34Forks
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383432024-062025-082026-10
Major 1Minor 8Patch 5

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 07:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistamphp/amp^3.1.dagger/composer.json
Packagistdagger/dagger*@dev.dagger/composer.json
Packagistrevolt/event-loop^1.0.dagger/composer.json
Packagistpsr/container^2.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/config^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/filesystem^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts^3.5composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/mime^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts^3.6composer.json
All dependencies 40

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 27 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistamphp/amp—direct
Packagistdagger/dagger—direct
Packagistpsr/container—direct
Packagistpsr/log—direct
Packagistrevolt/event-loop—direct
Packagistsymfony/config—direct
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection—direct
Packagistsymfony/filesystem—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel—direct
Packagistsymfony/mime—direct
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts—direct
Packagistasync-aws/s3—indirect
Packagistext-filter—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-mbstring—indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-symfony—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistshipmonk/composer-dependency-analyser—indirect
Packagistsymfony/asset—indirect
Packagistsymfony/asset-mapper—indirect
Packagistsymfony/console—indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector—indirect
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler—indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler—indirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client—indirect
Packagistsymfony/monolog-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing—indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch—indirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml—indirect
Packagisttwig/twig—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.